Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:36:53.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMBINING AGILE APPROACHES AND RISK MANAGEMENT FOR MECHATRONIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT – A CASE STUDY

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. Trauer ,
S. Schweigert-Recksiek ,
K. Gövert ,
M. Mörtl  and
U. Lindemann
J. Trauer*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
S. Schweigert-Recksiek
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
K. Gövert
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
M. Mörtl
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
U. Lindemann
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
*
*jakob.trauer@tum.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As the benefits and potentials of agile approaches become increasingly clearer, also hardware product development seeks to apply those methods and procedures. However, mechatronic hardware products are often subject to stricter safety regulations so that a consequent risk management is essential. This paper presents a risk management method suitable for agile product development projects. The method together with an adapted agile procedure were applied and evaluated in a successful industrial case study. This lead to the extended application of agile approaches in other parts of the company.

Keywords

agile developmentproduct developmentrisk managementsmall and medium size enterprise (SME)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 767 - 776
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Albers, A. et al. (2018), Eine Systematik zur situationsadäquaten Mechatroniksystementwicklung durch ASD - Agile Systems Design. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000091847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrat, H. and Jaswal, S. (2015), An alternative approach for risk assessment in Scrum. In CoCoNet (Ed.): 2015 International Conference on Computing and Network Communications (CoCoNet). 16-19 Dec. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoCoNet.2015.7411239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andresen, J. (2017), “Retrospektiven in agilen Projekten: Ablauf, Regeln und Methodenbausteine”, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, K. et al. (2001), “Manifesto for Agile Software Development”, Agile Alliance. Available online at https://www.agilealliance.org/agile101/the-agile-manifesto/, checked on 11/25/2019.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology. London: Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmer, A.I. (2018), “When digital meets physical - Agile innovation of mechatronic systems”, Dissertation. Technical University of Munich, München. Available online at https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1430507/1430507.pdf, checked on 11/25/2019.Google Scholar
Goevert, K. (2020), “Implementierung von agiler Entwicklung in den mechatronischen Produktentste-hungsprozess”, submitted in October 2019. Dissertation. Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Goevert, K., Brombeiss, M. and Lindemann, U. (2019), “Integration of Mechatronic Product Development Methods in an Agile Development Area”, In Chakrabarti, A. (Ed.): Research into design for a connected world. Proceedings of ICoRD 2019. Volume 2 / editor, Amaresh Chakrabarti, vol. 135. Singapore: Springer (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, volume 135), pp. 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5977-4_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goevert, K. Lindemann, U. (2018), “Further Development of an Agile Technique Toolbox for Mechatronic Product Development”, In: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. 15th International Design Conference, May, 21-24, 2018: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Croatia; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK (Design Conference Proceedings), pp. 2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goevert, K. et al. (2019, July), “Agile Development of a Microtiter Plate in an Interdisciplinary Project Team”, In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 2139–2148). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofert, S. (2016), Agiler führen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12757-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostettler, R. et al. (2017), TAF agile framework reducing uncertainty within minimum time and resources. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). Funchal, June 27-29, 2017. [S.l.]: IEEE, pp. 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279962Google Scholar
Klein, T. (2016), “Agiles Engineering im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau”, München: Herbert Utz Verlag (Forschungsberichte IWB, Band 323).Google Scholar
Nyfjord, J. and Kajko-Mattsson, M. (2008), “Outlining a Model Integrating Risk Management and Agile Software Development”, In: 34th EUROMICRO Conference Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2008. SEAA ‘08; 3 - 5 Sept. 2008, Parma, Italy. 2008 34th Euromicro Conference Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA). Parma, Italy, 9/3/2008 - 9/5/2008. Annual IEEE Computer Conference; EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications; SEAA. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 47–483. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2008.77Google Scholar
Odzaly, E. Des, G. and Stewart, D. (2014), “Lightweight Risk Management in Agile Projects”, In Reformat, M. (Ed.): 26th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 26th Software Engineering Knowledge Engineering Conference. Vancouver, Canada. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, pp. 576–581. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4681.0882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Project Management Institute (2017), A guide to the project management body of knowledge. PMBOK Guide. Sixth edition. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute (PMI global standard).Google Scholar
Reittinger, A. (2017), “Hybrid Agile – best of two worlds”, In Schröder, A. (Ed.): Agile Produktentwicklung. Schneller zur Innovation - erfolgreicher am Markt. München: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, pp. 218–234. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446452459.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, T.S. Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2018), Agile Development of Physical Products. An Empirical Study about Motivations, Potentials and Applicability. Neubiberg, Germany: Universität der Bundeswehr München.Google Scholar
Schwaber, K. and Sutherland, J. (2017), “The Scrum Guide”, The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game. Scrum.org. Available online at https://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf#zoom=100, checked on 11/13/2019.Google Scholar
Sommer, A.F. et al. (2013), “Scrum integration in stage-gate models for collaborative product development — A case study of three industrial manufacturers”, In: IEEM 2013. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: 10-13 December 2013, Bangkok, Thailand. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). Bangkok, Thailand, 12/10/2013 - 12/13/2013. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1278–1282. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohmeier, G. (2007), Ganzheitliches Risikomanagement in Industriebetrieben: Grundlagen, Gestaltungsmodell und praktische Anwendung: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tomanek, M. and Juricek, J. (2015), “Project Risk Management Model Based on PRINCE2 and Scrum Frameworks”, In IJSEA, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 81–88. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2015.6107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierlboeck, M. et al. (2019), “Budgeting for Agile Product Development”, In Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des., Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2169–2178. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar