Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:07:21.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MANAGEMENT OF DESIGN ITERATIONS ON COUPLED PARAMETERS IN DESIGN TEAMWORK USING MULTIPLE DOMAIN MATRIX AND COLOURED PETRI NETS

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. Juranić ,
N. Pavković  and
D. Jurinić
J. Juranić
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
N. Pavković*
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
D. Jurinić
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
*
*neven.pavkovic@fsb.hr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new way of structuring and interpretation of multiple domain matrix is proposed as the basis for categorisation of design parameter relations complexity. Depending on the kind and the degree of coupling of the parameters, the developed methodology activates the appropriate coloured Petri net (CPN) models for semi-automatic support of communication between the members of the design team. The proposed extension of MDM combined with CPN is a novel approach to predicting and managing communication patterns necessary during teamwork coordination on critical interfaces between product components.

Keywords

design processdesign teamsdesign structure matrix (DSM)multiple domain matrix (MDM)coloured petri nets
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 617 - 626
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Brisco, R., Whitfield, R.I. and Grierson, H. (2019), “A novel systematic method to evaluate computer-supported collaborative design technologies”, Research in Engineering Design, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00323-7Google Scholar
Browning, T.R. (2016), “Design Structure Matrix Extensions and Innovations: A Survey and New Opportunities”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2491283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, P.J. and Hamilton, J.R. (2000), “Signposting’, a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001630050021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C., Clarkson, J. and Stacey, M. (2001), “Information flow in engineering companies: Problems and their causes”, Proceedings of the 13th Int. Conf. on Engineering Design (ICED’01), Glasgow, UK, pp. 43–50.Google Scholar
Flanagan, T.L., Eckert, C.M. and Clarkson, P.J. (2003), “Parameter trails”, Proceedings of the 14th Inernational Conerence on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003, Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Jensen, K., Kristensen, L.M. and Wells, L. (2007), “Coloured Petri Nets and CPN Tools for Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems” International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, Vol. 9 No. 3-4, pp. 213–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-007-0038-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K. and Kristensen, L.M. (2009), Coloured Petri Nets, Vol. 1, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/b95112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juranić, J. et al. (2017), “Modelling the design parameters dynamics with Petri nets”, Proceedings of the 21st Int. Conf. ICED17, Canada, Design Society, pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
Juranić, J. et al. (2019), “Patterns of engineering design collaboration and reasoning activities modelled with Coloured Petri Nets”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 30 No. 10-12, pp. 563–598, https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2019.1630803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karniel, A. and Reich, Y. (2011), Managing the Dynamics of New Product Development Processes, Springer London, London, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-570-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, C., Kreimeyer, M. and Braun, T. (2008), “Multiple-Domain Matrix as a Framework for Systematic Process Analysis”, 10th International Design Structure Matrix Conference, DSM ’08, Stokcholm.Google Scholar
Kreimeyer, M. et al. (2009), “Extending multiple domain matrices to allow for the modeling of boolean operators in process models”, ICED'09 August 2009, Stanford university, USA.Google Scholar
Lindemann, U., Maurer, M. and Braun, T. (2009), Structural Complexity Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87889-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, M.E. (2008), “A structured approach to predicting and managing technical interactions in software development”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 47–70, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-007-0039-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toepfer, F. and Naumann, T. (2016), “Management of vehicle architecture parameters”, Proceedings of DESIGN 2016, the 14th International Design Conference, Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 1679–1688.Google Scholar