Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:53:41.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RELIABLE IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION OF CRITICAL INNOVATION DESIGN TASKS FOR PROCESS INTENSIFICATION IN PROCESS ENGINEERING

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

P. Livotov ,
Mas'udah  and
A. P. Chandra Sekaran
P. Livotov*
Affiliation:
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany
Mas'udah
Affiliation:
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany
A. P. Chandra Sekaran
Affiliation:
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany
*
*pavel.livotov@hs-offenburg.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sustainable design of equipment for process intensification requires a comprehensive and correct identification of relevant stakeholder requirements, design problems and tasks crucial for innovation success. Combining the principles of the Quality Function Deployment with the Importance-Satisfaction Analysis and Contradiction Analysis of requirements gives an opportunity to define a proper process innovation strategy more reliably and to develop an optimal process intensification technology with less secondary engineering and ecological problems.

Keywords

design methodseco-innovationquality function deployment (QFD)process engineering
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2019 - 2028
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Akao, Y. (1986), Quality Function Deployment, Productivity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Azzaro-Pantel, C. (2015), “Green Process Engineering Design Methodology: A Multicriteria Approach”, In: Poux, M., Cognet, P. and Gourdon, C. (Eds.), Green Process Engineering: From Concepts to Industrial Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 3–26. ISBN 9781482208177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettencourt, L. and Ulwick, A. (2008), “The customer-centered innovation map”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 No. 5, pp. 109–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Boodhoo, K. and Harvey, A. (2013), “Process Intensification: An overview of principles and practice”, In: Boodhoo, K. and Harvey, A. (Eds.), Process Intensification for Green Chemistry, John Wiley & sons, pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118498521.ch1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casner, D. and Livotov, P. (2017), “Advanced innovation design approach for process engineering”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 2017), Vol. 4: Design Methods and Tools, Vancouver, pp. 653–662.Google Scholar
Chan, L.K. and Wu, M.L. (2002), “Quality function deployment: a literature review”, Eur. J. Oper. Res, Vol. 143, pp. 463–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrusskin, C. (2016), “On the Identification of Contradictions Using Cause Effect Chain Analysis”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 39, TFC 2015, pp. 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livotov, P. (2008), “Method for quantitative evaluation of innovation tasks for technical systems, products and processes”, Proceedings of ETRIA World Conference, 2008, Synthesis in Innovation, Enschede, 5-7 November 2008, pp. 197-199. University of Twente, Enschede (2008). ISBN 978-90-365-2749-1Google Scholar
Mas'udah Livotov, P. and Chandra Sekaran, A.P. (2019), “Sustainable Innovation in Process Engineering Using Quality Function Deployment Approach and Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of Requirements”, In: Benmoussa, R., De Guio, R., Dubois, S. and Koziołek, S. (Eds.), New Opportunities for Innovation Breakthroughs for Developing Countries and Emerging Economies, Springer, Cham, pp. 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32497-1_22, 12Google Scholar
Masui, K. (2001), “Quality function deployment for environment: QFDE - a methodology in early stage of DfE”, Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Japan, IEEE, pp. 852–857. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECODIM.2001.992480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeuffer, V. and Scherb, B. (2016), “Identification of New Business Fields and Development Directions Using Contradictions”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 39, pp. 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisasamy, K., Arumugan, C. and Devadasan, S.R. (2016), “Advanced models of quality function deployment: a literature review”, Qual. Quant, Vol. 50, pp. 1399–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0212-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyl, B. et al. (2016), “A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 25 No. 10-12, pp. 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2014.992772CrossRefGoogle Scholar