Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:13:56.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE DESIGN ENGINEERING (SDE)? PERSPECTIVES FROM A PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING EDUCATION: M.SC. IN SDE AT AALBORG UNIVERSITY COPENHAGEN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

A. F. Valderrama Pineda
Affiliation:
Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark
M. Niero*
Affiliation:
Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sustainable Design Engineering (SDE) is an emerging research field and the development of programmes aiming at educating sustainable design engineers is very limited. One example is the SDE program at the Aalborg University in Copenhagen, which is based on a Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. In this article we aim to address the following three research questions: i) why Sustainable Design Engineering? ii) what is Sustainable Design Engineering? iii) How can Sustainable Design Engineering be implemented? By means of two examples from master thesis projects in the building and food sectors.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Askehave, I. et al. (2015), PBL. Problem Based Learning. [online] Aalborg Universitet Rektorsekretariatet. Available at: http://www.aau.dk/digitalAssets/148/148025_pbl-aalborg-model_uk.pdf (accessed 30.10.2019).Google Scholar
Brundtland, G.H. et al. (1987), Our common future, New York.Google Scholar
Cara D'Anjo, M. and Tolman, T. (2019), Calling the world from insulation: re-configuration of sociotechnical systems through product development, [Master Thesis], Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016), “Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions”, Design Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 118163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C. and Yoshinaka, Y. (2007), “Staging socio-technical spaces: translating across boundaries in design”, Journal of Design Research, Vol. 6 No. 1-2, pp. 6178. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2007.015563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dym, C.L. et al. (2005), “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 103120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC. (2011), Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
EC. (2015), COM (2015) 614 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Goggins, G. and Rau, H. (2016), “Beyond calorie counting: Assessing the sustainability of food provided for public consumption”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, pp. 257266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmos, A. et al. (2008), Facilitation in a PBL environment, UCPBL UNESCO Chair in Problem Based Learning, Aalborg.Google Scholar
Kuhlman, T. and Farrington, J. (2010), “What is sustainability?”, Sustainability, Vol. 2 No. 11, pp. 34363448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, M., Raworth, K. and Rockström, J. (2013), “Between social and planetary boundaries: navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity”, UNESCO/ISSC. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203419-10-enGoogle Scholar
Mulder, K.F. (2019), “Is Progress to Sustainability Committed Engineers Stalking?”, Journal of Modern Education Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 2328. https://dx.doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/01.09.2019/003Google Scholar
Pineda, A.F.V. and Jørgensen, U. (2018), “The challenges of teaching sustainable System Design” In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018/15th International Design Conference Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21-24, 2018, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 24852494, https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randers, J. et al. (2018), Transformation is feasible: How to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals within Planetary Boundaries. A report to the Club of Rome from Stockholm Resilience Centre and BI Norwegian Business School.Google Scholar
Saxe, H., Larsen, T. and Mogensen, L. (2013), “The global warming potential of two healthy Nordic diets compared with the average Danish diet”, Climatic Change, Vol. 116 No. 2, pp. 249262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0495-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. and Raven, R. (2012), “What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability”, Research Policy, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 10251036. https://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J. et al. (2009), “Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity”, Ecology and society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez Pariza, I., Ageitos Lantigua, L.J. and Höfte, M.H.B. (2019), The long road to consciuos consumption practices: The origin of food as key to raise awareness for sustainable local food in the Danish canteen. [Master Thesis]. Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Savin-Badin, M. (2014), “Using problem-based learning: New constellations for the 21st century”, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, Vol. 25 No. 3&4, pp. 197219.Google Scholar
Scott, K., Bakker, C. and Quist, J. (2012), “Designing change by living change”, Design Studies, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 279297. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storni, C. (2015), “Notes on ANT for designers: ontological, methodological and epistemological turn in collaborative design”, CoDesign, Vol. 11 No. 3-4, pp. 166178. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2017), Case study research and applications: Design and methods, Sage publications.Google Scholar