Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:58:11.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Addressing cultural inertias for co-design: exploring Chinese participants’ perceptions of design games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Ziheng Zhang ,
Rui Patricio ,
Tengjia Zuo ,
Wa An  and
Ruoqing Huang
Ziheng Zhang*
Affiliation:
Guangzhou Academy of Fine Art, China
Rui Patricio
Affiliation:
Universidade Europeia, IADE, Faculdade de Design, Tecnologia e Comunicação, UNIDCOM/IADE, Unidade de Investigação em Design e Comunicação, Portugal
Tengjia Zuo
Affiliation:
Guangzhou Academy of Fine Art, China
Wa An
Affiliation:
Guangzhou Academy of Fine Art, China
Ruoqing Huang
Affiliation:
Guangzhou Academy of Fine Art, China
*
ziheng.zhang.polimi@gmail.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Innovation-driven firms must adopt an open design strategy for competitiveness. Co-design games are recommended to foster an open, equal, and collaborative culture. However, most studies focus on the West. East-Asian countries, notably China, face unique challenges due to cultural disparities and inertia. This paper explores design games in the Chinese context through a case study with traditional workshops, revealing participants' perspectives and the potential impact on cultural inertia.

Keywords

co-designdesign managementdesign gamesEast-Asian culturecultural inertias
Type
Industrial Design
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 2483 - 2492
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albinsson, L., Forsgren, O. and Lind, M. (2008), “Towards a co-design approach for open innovation”, Towards a Co-Design Approach for Open Innovation Lars, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Brandt, E. (2006), “Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in participatory design?”, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design-Volume 1, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
Brandt, E. and Messeter, J. (2004), “Facilitating collaboration through design games”, Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices-Volume 1, pp. 121–131.Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressler, D.M., Bodzin, A.M., Eagan, B. and Tabatabai, S. (2019), “Using Epistemic Network Analysis to Examine Discourse and Scientific Practice During a Collaborative Game”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 553–566, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09786-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buur, J. and Soendergaard, A. (2000), “Video card game: an augmented environment for user centred design discussions”, Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing Augmented Reality Environments, pp. 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.M. and Thomas, J.C. (1982), “Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimenez-Fernandez, E., Abril, C., Breuer, H. and Gudiksen, S. (2021), “Gamification approaches for open innovation implementation: A conceptual framework”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 455–474, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, C.N., Borgos-Rodriguez, K. and Piper, A.M. (2019), “Engaging Low-Income African American Older Adults in Health Discussions through Community-based Design Workshops”, pp. 1–15, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. and Bond, M.H. (1988), “The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth”, Organizational Dynamics, Elsevier, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, O.S. and Buur, J. (2002), “Design is a game: Developing design competence in a game setting”, PDC, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
de Jesus, S.N., Rus, C.L., Lens, W. and Imaginário, S. (2013), “Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: A meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010”, Creativity Research Journal, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. and Wilemon, D. (2002), “Focusing the fuzzy front–end in new product development”, R&d Management, Wiley Online Library, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T.W. and Werbach, K. (2016), “More than just a game: ethical issues in gamification”, Ethics and Information Technology, Springer, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, T.W. (1982), “Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games”, Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsons, M.G. (1996), “Cultural constraints on radical re-engineering: Hammer and Lewin meet Confucius”, Journal of Applied Management Studies, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Patricio, R. (2017), “A gamified approach for engaging teams in corporate innovation and entrepreneurship”, World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 14 No. 2/3, pp. 254–262, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/wjstsd-10-2016-0057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patricio, R., Moreira, A., Zurlo, F. and Melazzini, M. (2020), “Co-creation of new solutions through gamification: A collaborative innovation practice”, Creativity and Innovation Management, No. November 2019, pp. 146–160, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrício, R., Moreira, A.C. and Zurlo, F. (2020), “Enhancing design thinking approaches to innovation through gamification”, European Journal of Innovation Management, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2020-0239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pun, K.-F., Chin, K.-S. and Lau, H. (2000), A Review of the Chinese Cultural Influences on Chinese Enterprise Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.K. and Mandl, H. (2017), “How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction”, Computers in Human Behavior, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 69, pp. 371–380, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, D. williamson. (2016), “A Tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis”, Journal of Learning Analytics, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, M. (2013), “Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination”, Design Issues, MIT Press One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA journals-info …, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 16–28.Google Scholar
Suits, B. (2014), The Grasshopper-: Games, Life and Utopia, Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Taoka, Y., Kagohashi, K. and Mougenot, C. (2021), “A cross-cultural study of co-design: the impact of power distance on group dynamics in Japan”, CoDesign, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 22–49, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1546321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, T.T. and Lee, K. (2009), “Multilevel Cross-Cultural Influences in User Experience Research: Focus on Discipline-Nationality Combination”, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII), HCI International 2009.Google Scholar
Tse, D.K. (1998), “Chinese cultural values and management: issues and implications”, Better Management, Vol. 31, pp. 15–19.Google Scholar
Vaajakallio, K. and Mattelmäki, T. (2014), “Design games in codesign: as a tool, a mindset and a structure”, CoDesign, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
West, J. and Bogers, M. (2014), “Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Wiley Online Library, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 814–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuoka, M., Nakatani, M. and Ohno, T. (2013), “Towards a culturally independent participatory design method: Fusing game elements into the design process”, 2013 International Conference on Culture and Computing, IEEE, pp. 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Patricio, R., Carella, G. and Zurlo, F. (2022), “Supporting a Sustainable and Engaging Online Transition for Co-Design through Gamification”, Sustainability, MDPI, Vol. 14 No. 11, p. 6716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. and Zurlo, F. (2021), “How game and game principles facilitate the co-design processes: reflections on two case studies”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 1745–1754.Google Scholar