Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:23:06.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aligning production requirements with product and production maturities: enhancing production preparation during product development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Rohith Areth Koroth ,
Fredrik Elgh ,
Martin Lennartsson  and
Dag Raudberget
Rohith Areth Koroth*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Jönköping University, Sweden
Fredrik Elgh
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Jönköping University, Sweden
Martin Lennartsson
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Jönköping University, Sweden
Dag Raudberget
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Jönköping University, Sweden
*
rohith.arethkoroth@ju.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Product development is multidisciplinary with high uncertainties necessitating coordinated decision-making between design and production. This paper presents a method to work with production requirements to support production preparation during product development aligned with different product and production maturities. The work was conducted in collaboration with two global manufacturing firms. The method supports identification, definition, and structuring of production requirements and the collaboration between design and production engineers for requirement prioritization and follow-up.

Keywords

product developmentintegrated product developmentrequirements managementproduction requirementsproduction preparation process
Type
Design Organisation, Collaboration and Management
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 195 - 204
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albers, A., Lanza, G., Klippert, M., Schäfer, L., Frey, A., Hellweg, F., Müller-Welt, P., et al. (2022), “Product-Production-CoDesign: An Approach on Integrated Product and Production Engineering Across Generations and Life Cycles”, Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 109 No. March, pp. 167–172, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, M.M. and Hein, L. (2000), Integrated Product Development.Google Scholar
Koroth, Areth, Elgh, R., Lennartsson, F., and Raudberget, M., D. (2022), “Design for Producibility: A Case Study on Theory, Practice and Gaps”, Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, IOS Press, Vol. 28, pp. 134–143, http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ATDE220640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koroth, Areth, Elgh, R., Lennartsson, F., and Raudberget, M., D. (2023), “A Method to Capture and Share Production Requirements Supporting a Collaborative Production Preparation Process”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 3, pp. 273–282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunoe, T.D., Andersen, A.L., Sorensen, D.G.H., Nielsen, K. and Bejlegaard, M. (2020), “Integrated product-process modelling for platform-based co-development”, International Journal of Production Research, Taylor and Francis Ltd., Vol. 58 No. 20, pp. 6185–6201, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1671628.Google Scholar
Coletta, A. (2012), The Lean 3P Advantage: A Practitioner's Guide to the Production Preparation Process, Taylor & Francis, https://doi.org/10.1201/b11811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOD. (2018), Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook.Google Scholar
Duda, J. (2020), Modelling of Concurrent Development of Assembly Process and System, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer International Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37566-9_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, C.V., Biesek, F.L. and Scalice, R.K. (2021), “Product innovation management model based on manufacturing readiness level (MRL), design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) and technology readiness level (TRL)”, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 43 No. 7, p. 360, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03080-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksson, O. and Eckert, C. (2020), Product Development 2040: Technologies Are Just as Good as the Designer's Ability to Integrate Them, Design Society Report DS 107 https://doi.org/10.35199/report.pd2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesus, G.T. and Chagas Junior, M.F. (2022), “Using Systems Architecture Views to Assess Integration Readiness Levels”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Vol. 69 No. 6, pp. 3902–3912, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3035492.Google Scholar
Lukić, D., Todić, V. and Milošević, M. (2010), “Model of modern technological production preparation”, Proceedings in Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
Markov, A., Babaev, S. and Yunakov, I. (2021), “Adaptation of PLM Information System in Industry 4.0 Concept at Stage of Technological Production Preparation”, 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2020), Springer International Publishing, pp. 105–111, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54817-9_12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, S. and Testani, M. V. (2011), “An integrated lean 3P and modeling approach for service and product introduction”, IIE Annual Conference Proceedings, Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers.Google Scholar
Santos, K., Loures, E., Piechnicki, F. and Canciglieri, O. (2017), “Opportunities Assessment of Product Development Process in Industry 4.0”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 11, pp. 1358–1365, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, L., Günther, M., Martin, A., Lüpfert, M., Mandel, C., Rapp, S., Lanza, G., et al. (2023), “Systematics for an Integrative Modelling of Product and Production System”, Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 118, pp. 104–109, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setti, P.H.P., Canciglieri Junior, O. and Estorilio, C.C.A. (2021), “DFA concepts in a concurrent engineering environment: A white goods case”, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, SAGE Publications Ltd, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 169–182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1063293X20985531.Google Scholar
Simpson, T.W. and Martins, J.R.R.A. (2011), “Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems: Report from a national science foundation workshop”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 133 No. 10, pp. 1–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4004465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skärin, F., Rösiö, C. and Andersen, A.L. (2022), “Considering Sustainability in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems Research-A Literature Review”, Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, IOS Press BV, Vol. 21, pp. 781–792, http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ATDE220196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolt, R. and André, S. (2022), “Requirements Handling in Multidisciplinary Product Development - A Company Study”, Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, Vol. 28, pp. 115–124, http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ATDE220638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2012), Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, 5th ed., New York, McGraw-Hill Irwin, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-5663(92)90013-D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vielhaber, M. and Stoffels, P. (2014), “Product development vs. Production development”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 21, pp. 252–257, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D. and Shortell, T.M. (2015), Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, 4th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Ward, M., Halliday, S., Olga, U., & Wong, T.C. (2018), “Three dimensions of maturity required to achieve future state, technology enabled manufacturing”, Roceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 232 No. 4, pp. 605–620, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405417710045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. and Gardner, J. (2019), “Aligning technology and institutional readiness: the adoption of innovation”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Routledge, Vol. 31 No. 10, pp. 1229–1241, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1601694.Google Scholar
Wiesner, S., Gaiardelli, P., Gritti, N. and Oberti, G. (2018), “Maturity models for digitalization in manufacturing - applicability for SMEs”, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 536, Springer New York LLC, pp. 81–88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_11.Google Scholar