Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:02:44.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Attempt to Grasp Resonance during Co-Creation with Biosignal Indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

A. Matsumae ,
K. Shoji  and
Y. Motomura
A. Matsumae*
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
K. Shoji
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
Y. Motomura
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
*
matsumae@design.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Resonance is known as an important phenomenon where individual creative moments resonate with each other during co-creation. The purpose of this study is to capture this co-creative moment as a resonant cognitive status with biosignal indicators. The authors conducted an experiment in which pairs of participants work on concept generation from two nouns and measured their dynamic creative status both subjectively and objectively with biosignal indicators fEMG and EOG. This study will help to understand co-creative cognitive phenomena and to improve the co-creative design process.

Keywords

resonancebio-signalco-designdesign cognitionidea generation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 921 - 930
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Hart, B., Struiksma, M.E., van Boxtel, A. and van Berkum, J.J.A. (2018), “Emotion in stories: Facial EMG evidence for both mental simulation and moral evaluation”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00613Google ScholarPubMed
Antrobus, J.S., Antrobus, J.S. and Singer, J.L. (1964), “EYE MOVEMENTS ACCOMPANYING DAYDREAMING, VISUAL IMAGERY, AND THOUGHT SUPPRESSION”, J. Abnorm. Psychol., American Psychological association, Vol. 69, pp. 244–252. 10.1037/h0041846Google ScholarPubMed
Bower, M. (2014), “Developing open intersubjectivity: On the interpersonal shaping of experience”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 455–474. 10.1007/s11097-014-9346-2Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T., Martzke, J.S., Petty, R.E. and Tassinary, L.G. (1988), “Specific forms of facial EMG response index emotions during an interview: From Darwin to the continuous flow hypothesis of affect-laden information processing”, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., psycnet.apa.org, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 592–604. 10.1037//0022-3514.54.4.592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T. and Petty, R.E. (1981), “Electromyograms as measures of extent and affectivity of information processing”, Am. Psychol., American Psychological Association, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 441–456. 10.1037/0003-066X.36.5.441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, F.J. and Keane, M.T. (2000), “Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination”, Cogn. Sci., Wiley Online Library. 10.1016/S0364-0213(00)00020-3Google Scholar
Ehkirch, Q., Kakiuchi, S., Motomura, Y., Matsumae, S. and Matsumae, A. (2021), “An Attempt to Understand Social Relationships Using Facial Expression Electromyography Analysis”, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 221, pp. 83–95. 10.1007/978-981-16-0041-8_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2013), “Inspiration peak: exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 215–232. 10.1080/21650349.2013.799309Google Scholar
Hoever, I.J., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W.P. and Barkema, H.G. (2012), “Fostering team creativity: Perspective Taking as Key to Unlocking Diversity's Potential”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 97 No. 5, pp. 982–996. 10.1037/a0029159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruis, A., Slagter, H.A., Bachhuber, D.R.W., Davidson, R.J. and Lutz, A. (2016), “Effects of Meditation Practice on Spontaneous Eye Blink Rate Ayla”, Psychophysiology., Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 749–758. 10.1111/psyp.12619Google Scholar
Li, S., Becattini, N. and Cascini, G. (2021), “Correlating Design Performance To Eeg Activation: Early Evidence From Experimental Data”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1 No. AUGUST, pp. 771–780. 10.1017/pds.2021.77Google Scholar
Matsumae, A., Matsumae, S. and Nagai, Y. (2020), “Dynamic relationship design of knowledge co-creating cluster: traditional Japanese architectural industry”, SN Applied Sciences, Springer International Publishing, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 1–11. 10.1007/s42452-020-2209-2Google Scholar
Matsumae, A. and Nagai, Y. (2018), “The function of co-creation in dynamic mechanism of intersubjectivity formation among individuals”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 / 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21-24, 2018, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 1925–1936. 10.21278/idc.2018.0141Google Scholar
Motomura, Y., Takeshita, A., Egashira, Y., Nishimura, T., Kim, Y. kyu and Watanuki, S. (2015), “Inter-individual relationships in empathic traits and feedback-related fronto-central brain activity: An event-related potential study”, Journal of Physiological Anthropology, Vol. 34 No. 14, pp. 1–6. 10.1186/s40101-015-0053-7Google ScholarPubMed
Nagai, Y. and Taura, T. (2017), “Critical Issues of Advanced Design Thinking: Scheme of Synthesis, Realm of Out-Frame, Motive of Inner Sense, and Resonance to Future Society”, pp. 115–133. 10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_8Google Scholar
Nagai, Y., Taura, T. and Mukai, F. (2009), “Role of Concept Blending and Dissimilarity in Creative Concept Generation Process: Comparisons between the Linguistic Interpretation Task and Design Task”, Cognitive Studies, Japanese Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 209–230. 10.11225/jcss.16.209Google Scholar
Taura, T. and Nagai, Y. (2010), “Research Issues and Methodologies in Design Theoretics — From the Viewpoints of ‘Future’, ‘Ideal’ and “Composition”, Cognitive Studies, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 389–402. 10.11225/jcss.17.389Google Scholar
Vieira, S., Gero, J., Gattol, V., Delmoral, J., Li, S., Cascini, G. and Fernandes, A. (2020), “The Neurophysiological activations of novice and experienced professionals when designing and problem-solving”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1 No. June, pp. 1569–1578. 10.1017/dsd.2020.121Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2001), Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity, Ohio University Press, Ohio.Google Scholar