No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING STUDENTS ESSENTIAL SKILLS' FOR TOMORROW
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper explores the assessment of Critical and Creative Thinking skills among Product Design and Engineering (PDE) students, whose profession holds significant potential for addressing the complex challenges facing global societies. In today's globalized world, higher education institutions must equip students to solve both local and global problems. The lack of emphasis on assessing critical problem-solving skills has led to growing concerns among employers and organizations that graduates may not be adequately prepared to meet the demands of the 21st-century workplace, including PDE.
This paper uses a case study approach to evaluate the performance of final-year PDE students, specifically their Critical and Creative Thinking abilities. The study assesses two groups, Group A and Group B, which produce solutions focused on the marketplace and design sustainable solutions, respectively. The study concludes that solving wicked problems that require sustainable solutions demands a higher level of these skills. The study's findings are consistent with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's 2022 report, which also highlighted low levels of CriT and CreT in students at the same level studied for this paper.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Brankaert, R. G. A., and den, Ouden, P. H. (2017). “The design thinking approach to guide the process of co-creating shared value”. In “Conference proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management”, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 621–635.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., and Stone, M. M. (2018). “Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging”. Journal Public Administration Review, Vol. 78(2), pp. 214–223.Google Scholar
Ceschin, F., and Gaziulusoy, I. (2019). “Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 208, pp. 249–263.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (1987). “A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities”. In Baron, J. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), “Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice” (pp. 9–26). Freeman, W. H.. Halpern, D. F. (2014). “Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking”. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Facione, P. A. (2011). “Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts”. Journal Insight Assessment.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2014). “Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking”. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, T. (2019). “People, power and wicked problems: A comparative study of strategies to resolve complex problems”. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hsu, P. F., and Chen, C. H. (2018). “The relationship between critical thinking and creative thinking in product design”. Journal International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 28(2), pp. 401–418.Google Scholar
Kuhn, D. (2011). “Education for thinking”. Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 81(3), pp. 345–362.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (2000). “Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress”. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). “PISA 2018 results (volume III): What school life means for students' lives”. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). “Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators”. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnell, R., Cheshire, J., and Roberts, A. (2015). “The role of green infrastructure in climate change adaptation in cities”. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, Vol. 11(1), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Paul, R., and Elder, L. (2005). “Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought”. Journal of Developmental Education, Vol. 29(2), pp. 2–5.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2007). “Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice”. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shively, R. L. (2018). “Developing and validating rubrics for assessing critical and creative thinking skills in undergraduates”. Journal International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 30(1), pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). “The nature of creativity”. Journal Creativity Research Journal, Vol.18(1), pp. 87–98.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2020). “The Future of Jobs Report 2020”. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020Google Scholar
Tal, A., Héroux, M. E., Goldberg, M. S., Lakhani, R., and Sinclair, M. (2019). “Are we there yet? Assessing the effectiveness of air quality regulations in improving public health”. Journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16(3), pp. 434.Google Scholar
Van Damme, D., and Zahner, M. (2022). “The Future of Education in Design: Defining 21st Century Skills for Design and Design Education”. She Ji: The OECD Publishing of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 8(1), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access