Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:38:20.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES TO REPAIR IN REPAIR CAFES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Cédric Masclet ,
Jasmine Laura Mazudie  and
Jean-François Boujut
Cédric Masclet*
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France
Jasmine Laura Mazudie
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France
Jean-François Boujut
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France
*
Masclet, Cédric, Université Grenoble Alpes, France, cedric.masclet@g-scop.eu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For some years now, a part of the population in Europe has been willing to moderate its consumption and to enter into a sustainable waste reduction perspective. Repair is an important lever in the sustainability of products. It requires appropriate approaches depending on the actors involved, whether they are public, private or at the consumer level. Repair cafés are thus born of local citizen initiatives to act on the life cycle of everyday consumer products. We conducted a qualitative study based on a series of semi-structured interviews with the actors of repair cafés in the Grenoble area (France) and carried out an analysis of qualitative data. This analysis, according to three pre-defined fields, technology-competencies-motivations, reveals the perception of the actors on the current obstacles and opportunities for the development of the amateur repair practice. The results obtained support studies already carried out on the subject and show that design is still failing to match amateur reparation requirements. Besides, the social role of these third places takes precedence over the ecological and economic dimension of repair.

Keywords

SustainabilityCircular economyDesign for X (DfX)repairopen community
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 727 - 736
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bracquene, E., Peeters, J., Alfieri, F., Sanfelix, J., Duflou, J., Dewulf, W., and Cordelia, M. (2021), “Analysis of evaluation systems for product repairability: A case study for washing machines”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 281, p. 125122, http://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2020.125122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K. and Persson, O. (2022), “Community repair in the circular economy - fixing more than stuff”. Community repair in the circular economy — fixing more than stuff. Local Environment, Vol. 27 No. 10-11, pp. 1321–1337, http://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2041580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brem, A. and Wolfram, P. (2014), “Research and development from the bottom up - introduction of terminologies for new product development in emerging markets”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 3 No. 1, p. 9, http://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-3-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasson, A. and Vasseur, L. (2021), “Accelerating the transition to circular consumption models: The example of the AGEC law in France”, Field Actions Science Reports. The journal offield actions, Vol. Special Issue 23 | 2021 No. Special Issue 23, pp. 40–43.Google ScholarPubMed
De Fazio, F., Bakker, C., Flipsen, B. and Balkenende, R. (2021), “The Disassembly Map: A new method to enhance design for product repairability”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 320, p. 128552, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getto, G. and Labriola, J.T. (2016), “iFixit Myself: User-Generated Content Strategy in “The Free Repair Guide for Everything””, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 37–55, http://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2527259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobert, J., Allais, R. and Deroubaix, J.F. (2021), “Repair and reuse: Misalignments between stakeholders and possible users”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 317, p. 128454, http://doi.org/10.1016/jj.jclepro.2021.128454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennink, M.M., Kaiser, B.N. and Marconi, V.C. (2017), “Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?”, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 591–608, http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, R.J., Miranda, C. and Goni, J. (2020), “Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the 'Right to Repair'”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 3, p. 850, http://doi.org/10.3390/su12030850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MeiBner, M. (2021), “Repair is care? - Dimensions of care within collaborative practices in repair cafes”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 299, p. 126913, http://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2021.126913.Google Scholar
Moalem, R.M. and Mosgaard, M.A. (2021), “A Critical Review of the Role of Repair Cafes in a Sustainable Circular Transition”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 22, p. 12351, http://doi.org/10.3390/su132212351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrignani, N. and Whitehouse, D. (2015), “Slow Tech: A roadmap for a good, clean and fair ICT”, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. 13 No. 3/4, pp. 268–282, http://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2015-0014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radjou, N. and Roberts, K. (2012), Jugaad Innovation : Think Frugal, Be Flexible, Generate Breakthrough Growth /Navi Radjou, Jaideep Prabhu, Simone Ahuja; [Foreword by Kevin Roberts,…], Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Schagg, E., Becker, S.L. and Pradhan, P. (2022), “Thwarted visions of change: Power and demographics in repair cafes and urban sustainability transitions”, Urban Transformations, Vol. 4 No. 1,p. 1, http://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-022-00031-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terzioglu, N. (2021), “Repair motivation and barriers model: Investigating user perspectives related to product repair towards a circular economy”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 289, p. 125644, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terzioglu, N. and Wever, R. (2021), “Integrating Repair into Product Design Education: Insights on Repair, Design and Sustainability”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 18, p. 10067, http://doi.org/10.3390/su131810067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandekerkhove, R., Moons, I. and Du Bois, E. (2021), “Introducing repair in sports' consumables: Investigation of repairability of badminton shuttles”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 326, p. 129229, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenabeele, J. and Decuypere, M. (2022), “Repair tables, broken vacuum cleaners and posters: Weaving new worlds together in response to breakdowns”, European Educational Research Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 435–449, http://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211065332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar