Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:29:05.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMBINING FUNCTION MODELLING AND REQUIREMENTS MODELLING WITH THE IFM FRAMEWORK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Merlin Frederik Krüger ,
Stefan Zorn  and
Kilian Gericke
Merlin Frederik Krüger*
Affiliation:
University of Rostock
Stefan Zorn
Affiliation:
University of Rostock
Kilian Gericke
Affiliation:
University of Rostock
*
Krüger, Merlin Frederik, University of Rostock, Germany, merlin.krueger@uni-rostock.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The transmission of information between requirements modelling and function modelling in the product development process often appears challenging because of multiple used models and different terminology of specific disciplines. The integrated function modelling (IFM) framework is used for functional analysis of technical moderate complex systems and supports cross-disciplinary modelling and communication in the design team. To improve the applicability of this method and its supporting purpose in the modelling process, the authors combined requirements as an additional entity with the existing entities of this method. Furthermore, the extended framework has been used to visualise the procedure with this approach as an example. The outlook provides the potential for further development of the method.

Keywords

Functional modellingRequirementsIntegrated system modellingDesign methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 987 - 996
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bender, K. (2005) Embedded Systems - qualitätsorientierte Entwicklung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b138984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldt, L. (2000) ‘Managing requirements at the object level’, SAE Technical Papers, (724). https://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichinger, M., Maurer, M. and Lindemann, U. (2006) ‘Using multiple design structure matrices’. 9th International Design Conference, Design 2006, pp. 229–236.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B. (2013) ‘Der Integrated Function Modelling ( IFM ) Framework’, (January).Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B. et al. (2015) ‘Integrated function modelling: Comparing the IFM framework with SYSML’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 5(DS 80-05).Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B. et al. (2016) ‘A DSM-based framework for integrated function modelling: concept, application and evaluation’, Research in Engineering Design, 28(1), pp. 25–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0228-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbart, B. and Gericke, K. (2011) ‘A Framework for Comparing Design modelling approaches across disciplines’, International Conference of Engineering Design, (January), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Gericke, K. and Eisenbart, B. (2017) ‘The integrated function modeling framework and its relation to function structures’, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, 31(4), pp. 436–457. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S089006041700049X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, L. and Finkelstein, A. (2006) ‘Abstraction-Based Requirements Management’, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. and Wiebel, R. (2005) Optimieren von Requirements Management & Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Hooks, I. and Jackson, B. G. (1990) ‘Why Johnny can't write requirements’, AIAA Space Programs and Technologies Conference, 1990. https://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1990-3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubka, V. and Eder, W. E. (1988) Theory of technical systems: a total concept theory for engineering design. Berlin: Springer. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=3089886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. (2000) ‘Problem Frames: Analysing & Structuring Software Development Problems: Analysing & Structuring Software Development’, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Jarratt, T. A. W. et al. (2011) ‘Engineering change: An overview and perspective on the literature’, Research in Engineering Design, 22(2), pp. 103–124. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-010-0097-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiao, J. and Zhang, Y. (2005) ‘Product portfolio identification based on association rule mining’, CAD Computer Aided Design, 37(2), pp. 149–172. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2004.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiner, S. and Kramer, C. (2013) ‘Model Based Design with Systems Engineering Based on RFLP Using V6’, Proceedings of the 23rd CIRP Design Conference, pp. 93–102. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreimeyer, M. and Lindemann, U. (2011) ‘Complexity Metrics in Engineering Design’. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, M. F. et al. (2020) ‘The Application of the IFM Framework and FIDD Method on an Industrial Cigarette Filter Maker’, (September), pp. 10–10. https://dx.doi.org/10.35199/dsm2020.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Hall, J. G. and Rapanotti, L. (2013) ‘On the systematic transformation of requirements to specifications’, Requirements Engineering, 19(4), pp. 397–419. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00766-013-0173-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G. et al. (2007) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 3. Edition. Edited by Wallace, K. and Blessing, L.. Springer Vieweg.Google Scholar
Roth, K. (1994) ‘Konstruieren mit Konstruktionskatalogen’. Berlin [u.a.]: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rötzer, S. et al. (2022) ‘Attribute dependency graphs: modelling cause and effect in systems design’, Design Science, 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C. (2005) ‘CPM/PDD – an Extended Theoretical Approach To Modelling Products and Product Development Processes’, Proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli Symposium on Advances in Methods and Systems for Development of Products and Processes, pp. 159–179.Google Scholar
Wong, F. S. and Wynn, D. C. (2022) ‘A systematic approach for product modelling and function integration to support adaptive redesign of product variants’, Research in Engineering Design, (0123456789). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-022-00401-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar