Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:39:39.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CREATING AN OPEN-SOURCE, LOW-COST COMPOSITE FEEDER DESIGN TO IMPROVE FILAMENT QUALITY OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE MATERIALS TO BE USED IN FUSED FILAMENT FABRICATION (FFF)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Henrik H. Øvrebø ,
Svein-Andre Koldre ,
Ole S. Nesheim ,
Sindre Wold Eikevåg ,
Martin Steinert  and
Christer W. Elverum
Henrik H. Øvrebø
Affiliation:
NTNU
Svein-Andre Koldre
Affiliation:
NTNU
Ole S. Nesheim*
Affiliation:
NTNU
Sindre Wold Eikevåg
Affiliation:
NTNU
Martin Steinert
Affiliation:
NTNU
Christer W. Elverum
Affiliation:
NTNU
*
Nesheim, Ole S., NTNU, Norway, ole.s.nesheim@ntnu.no

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Composite filaments are getting increased attention in additive manufacturing (AM). More and better solutions for filament production are needed to assist researchers in discovering new materials capable of producing AM-made high-performance parts. This article presents a method for producing composite filament, including an open-source, low-cost automatic composite feeder designed to increase the accuracy and quality of the filament. The feeder includes a fibre screw designed through an iterative prototyping process to accurately control the filament's fibre percentage while reducing lumps' occurrence in a single step. An experiment evaluating the quality of filament made of Polylactic Acid (PLA) and carbon fibre (CF) tested the use of the feeder compared to manual mixing. Filament with a nominal diameter of 2.85mm with 4.5%, 7.9%, 11.2% and 14.5% CF was made. The results suggest that the composite feeder improved the filament quality. The filament diameter RMSE value was reduced from 0.08 to 0.06 and 0.15 to 0.13 for both 4.5% and 11.2%, respectively. The article concludes that the feeder design may help researchers develop and discover new materials while improving the quality of the filament.

Keywords

Additive ManufacturingOpen source designSustainabilityRecyclingComposite materials
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1097 - 1106
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

3Devo, 2022a. 3Devo [WWW Document]. URL https://www.3devo.com (accessed 11.30.22).Google Scholar
3Devo, 2022b. Devovision [WWW Document]. URL https://www.3devo.com/devovision (accessed 12.5.22).Google Scholar
Biesterveld, L., Stolk, R., van der Laak, T., 2021. The production of an ABS/ Carbon fiber composite - 3DEVO.Google Scholar
Birkelid, A.H., Eikevåg, S.W., Elverum, C.W., Steinert, M., 2022. High-performance polymer 3D printing – Open-source liquid cooled scalable printer design. HardwareX 11, e00265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2022.e00265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjørken, O.U., Andresen, B., Eikevåg, S.W., Steinert, M., Elverum, C.W., 2022. Thermal Layer Design in Fused Filament Fabrication. Applied Sciences 12, 7056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botelho, E.C., Figiel, L., Rezende, M.C., Lauke, B., 2003. Mechanical behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide composites. Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00119-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calignano, F., Lorusso, M., Roppolo, I., Minetola, P., 2020. Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of a Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Nylon Filament for 3D Printing. MDPI. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/machines8030052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolo, L., O'Connell, J., 2022. The Best Carbon Fiber Filaments of 2022 [WWW Document]. All3DP. URL https://all3dp.com/2/carbon-fiber-filament-explained-and-compared/ (accessed 11.28.22).Google Scholar
D18 Committee, 2010. Practice for Measuring Sifting Segregation Tendencies of Bulk Solids. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6940-10Google Scholar
Gale, M., 1997. Compounding with single-screw extruders. Advances in Polymer Technology 16, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199711)16:4<251::AID-ADV1>3.0.CO;2-U3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H.F. Jr, III, E.M.M., Jr, J.R.W., 2004. Extrusion: The Definitive Processing Guide and Handbook. William Andrew.Google Scholar
Heidemeyer, P., Pfeiffer, J., 2002. Special requirements on compounding technology for bimodal polyolefines and their industrial application. Macromolecular Symposia 181, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3900(200205)181:1<167::AID-MASY167>3.0.CO;2-F3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.M., Rowell, M., Deason, B., Eubanks, M., 2011. Benchmarking Evaluation of an Open Source Fused Deposition Modeling Additive Manufacturing System. University of Texas at Austin. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, E.M. III, Chung, C.I., 1978. Melting behavior of solid polymers on a metal surface at processing conditions. Polymer Engineering & Science 18, 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760180906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muralisrinivasan, N.S., 2015. Introduction to Polymer Compounding: Machinery and Technology, Volume 2. Smithers Rapra.Google Scholar
NatureWorks, LLC, 2020. Ingeo - PLA - Datasheet.Google Scholar
Dr. Neboian, A., 2022. To Dry or Not to Dry Your Filament. URL https://www.xioneer.com/material/to-dry-or-not-to-dry-your-filament/?v=c2f3f489a005 (accessed 11.28.22).Google Scholar
Ning, F., Cong, W., Qiu, J., Wei, J., Wang, S., 2015. Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parandoush, P., Lin, D., 2017. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Composite Structures 182, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J.M., 2012. Building Research Equipment with Free, Open-Source Hardware. Science 337, 1303–1304. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polizzi, M.A., Franchville, J., Hilden, J.L., 2016. Assessment and predictive modeling of pharmaceutical powder flow behavior in small-scale hoppers. Powder Technology 294, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SGL Carbon, 2021. SIGRAFIL Short Carbon Fibers [WWW Document]. URL https://www.sglcarbon.com/en/markets-solutions/material/sigrafil-short-carbon-fibers/ (accessed 4.17.23).Google Scholar
van de Werken, N., Tekinalp, H., Khanbolouki, P., Ozcan, S., Tehrani, M., Williams, A., 2019. Additively manufactured carbon fiber-reinforced composites_ State of the art and perspective. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C., Troughton, M., Khamsehnezhad, A., Zhang, X., 2020. Effect of insufficient homogenization during the extrusion of polyethylene pipes on butt fusion joint integrity. Weld World 64, 1703–1713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-020-00948-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar