Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-28T02:57:30.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DECISION QUALITY IN COMPLEX PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: REFLECTIONS ON A CASE STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Ghadir Siyam ,
Mariely Salgueiro  and
John Kennedy
Ghadir Siyam*
Affiliation:
bp Exploration Operating Company Limited, P&O
Mariely Salgueiro
Affiliation:
bp Exploration Operating Company Limited, P&O
John Kennedy
Affiliation:
bp Exploration Operating Company Limited, P&O
*
Siyam, Ghadir, bp, Global Concept Development, United Kingdom, ghadir.siyam@uk.bp.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Conceptual design projects are increasingly known as an intense decision-making process. Much of the decision-making is comparing the degree of preference between choices. In the complex projects of the upstream business of oil and gas, good decisions are crucial for success. Decisions are typically made within a dynamic environment, wide range of uncertainty, and have to account for the asset life cycle. This paper reflects on the application of the decision quality framework with a focus on decision modelling. Using an industrial example, a systematic approach to visualise and improve decision making process is proposed. The approach applies a Dependency Structure Matrix (DSM) and Decision Quality frameworks and identified opportunities for future research.

Keywords

Decision makingIndustrial designIntegrated product development
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 861 - 870
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Blenko, M.W., Mankins, M.C., and Rogers, P. (2015), “The Decision-Driven Organization”, Harvard business Review, section 4.Google Scholar
Browning, T.R., Fricke, E., and Negele, H. (2006), “Key Concepts in Modeling Product Development Processes”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 104–128.10.1002/sys.20047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spetzler, Carl, Winter, Hannah, Meyer, Jennifer (2016), “Decision Quality: Value Creation from Better Business Decisions” John Wiley & Sons, Business & Economics 10.1002/9781119176657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppinger, S.D. (2001), “Innovation at the Speed of Information”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 149–158.Google Scholar
Hammond, John S., Keeney, Ralph L., and Raiffa, Howard(1999), “Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions” New York: Broadway BooksGoogle Scholar
Jaber, H., Marle, F., Jankovic, M., (2015), “Improving Collaborative Decision Making in New Product Development Projects Using Clustering Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering, Management. Volume: 62, Issue: 4, Page(s): 475-48310.1109/TEM.2015.2458332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. (2014), “Decision Theory: AN Introduction”, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Phillips-Wren, G. and Power, D., (2019), “Cognitive bias, decision styles, and risk attitudes in decision making and DSS”, Journal of Decision Systems 10.1080/12460125.2019.1646509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, N. and De Feis, G., (2009), “Strategic Decision-Making: Models and Methods in the Face of Complexity and Time Pressure”, Journal of General Management 10.1177/030630700903500204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, B. (2015), “Decision Road mapping: Decision Making at Pace”, International Dependency and Structure Modelling Conference (DSM '15), Fort Worth, Texas.Google Scholar
Sawiris, R., Howes, C. S., Rodriguez, J. A., Foley, W. L.(2015), “Uncertainty and Risk Management Plans are Critical for Team Alignment and Better Decision Quality”, SPE-174932-MS, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 28-30 September, Houston, Texas, USA10.2118/174932-MSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyam, Ghadir; Robinson, Robert Wilson; and Kilpinen, Malia (2017), “Modelling Decisions in Complex Products”, 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 17, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Steward, Donald V (1981), “The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. EM-28, no. 3, pp. 71–74, Aug. 1981. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventroux, J., Franck, M., and Vidal, L. (2018), “Organizational reshuffling to facilitate coordinated decisions in complex projects”, Concurrent Engineering, Volume: 26 issue: 3, page(s): 299–30910.1177/1063293X18756718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yassin, A. and Braha, D. (2003), “Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method”, Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 165–176.10.1177/106329303034503CrossRefGoogle Scholar