Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:52:05.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design Reviews in Immersive and Non-Immersive Collaborative Virtual Environments: Comparing Verbal Communication Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

N. Horvat ,
M. Brnčić ,
M. M. Perišić ,
T. Martinec ,
N. Bojčetić  and
S. Škec
N. Horvat*
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
M. Brnčić
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
M. M. Perišić
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
T. Martinec
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
N. Bojčetić
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
S. Škec
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Croatia
*
horvatn@fsb.hr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper explores the differences between immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) during design reviews. Based on ten reviews with one designer and two reviewers, the study shows that CVEs affect verbal communication structure. More specifically, teams usually talked less, and reviewers exchanged significantly more turn sequences in immersive than in non-immersive CVEs. Regardless of the environment, most turn sequences were related to the designer, who usually talked the most. These findings contribute to the understanding of CVEs in virtual teams.

Keywords

collaborative designvirtual reality (VR)design reviewverbal communication structurevirtual teams
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 211 - 220
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Bassanino, M., Fernando, T. and Wu, K. (2014), “Can virtual workspaces enhance team communication and collaboration in design review meetings?”, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Vol. 10No. 3–4, pp. 200–217. 10.1080/17452007.2013.775102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, L.P. and Vance, J.M. (2016), “An Industry Case Study: Investigating Early Design Decision Making in Virtual Reality”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 17 No. 1, p. 011001. 10.1115/1.4034267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierhals, R., Schuster, I., Kohler, P. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2007), “Shared mental models—linking team cognition and performance”, CoDesign, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 75–94. 10.1080/15710880601170891.Google Scholar
BS EN 61160. (2005), Design Review, BS EN 61160:2005.Google Scholar
Chandrasegaran, S.K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R.D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R.F. and Gao, W. (2013), “The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems”, Computer-Aided Design, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 204–228. 10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006.Google Scholar
D'Astous, P., Détienne, F., Visser, W. and Robillard, P.N. (2004), “Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: a study of software technical review meetings”, Design Studies, Vol. 25 No. 6,pp. 625–655. 10.1016/j.destud.2003.12.002.Google Scholar
Dossick, C.S. (2014), “Messy Work in Virtual Worlds: Exploring Discovery and Synthesis in Virtual Teams”,pp. 134–142. 10.1007/978-3-319-10831-5_19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulebohn, J.H. and Hoch, J.E. (2017), “Virtual teams in organizations”, Human Resource Management Review, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 569–574. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eris, O., Martelaro, N. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2014), “A comparative analysis of multimodal communication during design sketching in co-located and distributed environments”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 559–592. 10.1016/j.destud.2014.04.002.Google Scholar
Gilson, L.L., Maynard, M.T., Jones Young, N.C., Vartiainen, M. and Hakonen, M. (2015), “Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities”, Journal of Management, Vol. 41 No. 5,pp. 1313–1337. 10.1177/0149206314559946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvat, N., Becattini, N., Martinec, T. and Skec, S. (2021), “Identifying Indicators for the Use of Virtual Prototypes in Distributed Design Activities”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 320–335. 10.14733/cadaps.2022.320-335.Google Scholar
Horvat, N., Martinec, T., Lukačević, F., Perišić, M.M. and Škec, S. (2022a), “The potential of immersive virtual reality for representations in design education”, Virtual Reality. 10.1007/s10055-022-00630-w.Google Scholar
Horvat, N., Martinec, T., Perišić, M.M. and Škec, S. (2022b), “The effect of collaborative virtual environments on issue identification”, Procedia CIRP Design.Google Scholar
Horvat, N., Škec, S., Martinec, T., Lukačević, F. and Perišić, M.M. (2019), “Comparing Virtual Reality and Desktop Interface for Reviewing 3D CAD Models”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1923–1932. 10.1017/dsi.2019.198.Google Scholar
Huet, G., Culley, S.J., McMahon, C.A. and Fortin, C. (2007), “Making sense of engineering design review activities”, AI EDAM, Vol. 21 No. 03, pp. 243–266. 10.1017/S0890060407000261.Google Scholar
Jiang, H. and Gero, J.S. (2017), “Comparing Two Approaches to Studying Communications in Team Design”, in Gero, J.S. (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition ’16, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 301–319. 10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_17.Google Scholar
Lauff, C.A., Knight, D., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M.E. (2020), “The role of prototypes in communication between stakeholders”, Design Studies, Vol. 66, pp. 1–34. 10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.007.Google Scholar
Leenders, R.T.A.., van Engelen, J.M.. and Kratzer, J. (2003), “Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 20 No. 1–2, pp. 69–92. 10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Castronovo, F., Messner, J. and Leicht, R. (2020), “Evaluating the Impact of Virtual Reality on Design Review Meetings”, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34 No. 1, p. 04019045. 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Messner, J.I. and Leicht, R.M. (2018), “A process model for usability and maintainability design reviews”, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 457–469. 10.1080/17452007.2018.1512042.Google Scholar
Ventura, Mastrolembo, Castronovo, S., and Ciribini, F., A.L.C. (2020), “A design review session protocol for the implementation of immersive virtual reality in usability-focused analysis”, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, Vol. 25, pp. 233–253. 10.36680/j.itcon.2020.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reymen, I.M.M.J., Hammer, D.K., Kroes, P.A., van Aken, J.E., Dorst, C.H., Bax, M.F.T. and Basten, T. (2006), “A domain-independent descriptive design model and its application to structured reflection on design processes”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 147–173. 10.1007/s00163-006-0011-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. a and Jefferson, G. (1974), “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation”, Language. 10.2307/412243.Google Scholar
Tea, S., Panuwatwanich, K., Ruthankoon, R. and Kaewmoracharoen, M. (2021), “Multiuser immersive virtual reality application for real-time remote collaboration to enhance design review process in the social distancing era”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. ahead-of-p No. ahead-of-print. 10.1108/JEDT-12-2020-0500.Google Scholar
Wetmore, W.R., Summers, J.D. and Greenstein, J.S. (2010), “Experimental study of influence of group familiarity and information sharing on design review effectiveness”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 111–126. 10.1080/09544820802238217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfartsberger, J. (2019), “Analyzing the potential of Virtual Reality for engineering design review”, Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 104 No. March, pp. 27–37. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.018.Google Scholar
Zaker, R. and Coloma, E. (2018), “Virtual reality-integrated workflow in BIM-enabled projects collaboration and design review: a case study”, Visualization in Engineering, Vol. 6 No. 1, p. 4. 10.1186/s40327-018-0065-6.Google Scholar