Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:18:45.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing a method to improve unknown identification and design efforts for environmental transition: a case study in the packaging industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Marion Deshoulières ,
Pascal Le Masson  and
Benoît Weil
Marion Deshoulières*
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech, France
Pascal Le Masson
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech, France
Benoît Weil
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech, France
*
marion.deshoulieres@minesparis.psl.eu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most manufacturing companies have tested and adopted sustainable design methods to navigate their product's environmental transition. While successful at first in enhancing their environmental performance, these companies later struggle to pursue their environmental transition. This entails mastering two critical competencies: identifying transition unknowns, and fostering adequate design efforts. This action research with an innovative design intermediary - which has completed four sustainable packaging missions - reveals the specific design barriers encountered for environmental transition.

Keywords

design methodsunknownsustainable designC-K design theorypackaging
Type
Design Methods and Tools
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 543 - 552
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Aggeri, F. & Hatchuel, A. (1996). A Dynamic Model of Environmental Policies. The case of innovation oriented voluntary agreements. In: International Workshops on "The Economics and Law of Voluntary Agreements in Environmental Policies", Venice, 18-19 November 1996Google Scholar
Bahmra, T., Lilley, D. & Tang, T. (2011). Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour. The Design Journal, 14(4), 427-445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P. & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 65. 42–56. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceschin, F. & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. In: Design studies, Elsevier, 47, 118–163.Google Scholar
Fussler, C. & James, P. (1996). Driving Eco-innovation. A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability. Pearson Professional Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Gatt, I. J. & Refalo, P. (2022). Reusability and recyclability of plastic cosmetic packaging: A life cycle assessment. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances Vol (15) November 2022, 200098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, G., Merrill, R.K. & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45, Vol (5), 999-1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D., Corley, K. & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods. 16. 15-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P. & Weil, B. (2011). Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept– knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects. In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 25, 77–92. Cambridge University Press, 2011 0890-0604/11Google Scholar
Kaestner, L., Scope, C., Neumann, N. & Woelfel, C. (2023). Sustainable Circular Packaging Design: A Systematic Literature Review on Strategies and Applications in the Cosmetics Industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED23), Bordeaux, France, 24-28 July 2023.Google Scholar
Le Masson, P., Hatchuel, A. & Weil, B. (2011). The Interplay Between Creativity Issues and Design Theories: A New Perspective for Design Management Studies? Creativity and Innovation Management. 20(4), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAloone, T.C. & Pigosso, D.C.A. (2017). From Ecodesign to Sustainable Product/Service-Systems: A journey through Research Contributions over Recent Decades, in: Stark, R., Seliger, G., & Bonvoisin, J. (Eds.), Sustainable Manufacturing. Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management. Springer.Google Scholar
McMahon, C., Subrahmanian, E. & Reich, Y. (2022). Lock-In, Fixation and the Extinction of Technologies: A Design-Theoretic View of Sustainable Transition. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation. 8(3)Google Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A., McAloone, T.C. & Rozenfeld, H. (2014). Systematization of Best Practices for Ecodesign Implementation. In: Proceedings of International Design Conference DESIGN 2014.Google Scholar
Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0? In: Resources, conservation and recycling, Elsevier, 135, 246–264.Google Scholar
Ryan, C. (2003). Learning from a decade (or so) of Eco-Design Experience, part I. Journal of Industrial Ecology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, C. (2013). Critical agendas: Designing for Sustainability from products and systems. In: Walker, S. & Giard, J. (Eds), The Handbook of Design for Sustainability. London, New-York: Routledge, (in press).Google Scholar
Tyl, B., Vallet, F., Pialot, O., Millet, D., Le Duigou, J. & Graves, G. (2016). The ESM approach: 8 mechanisms to efficiently support eco-ideation. In: Proceedings of International Design Conference DESIGN 2016.Google Scholar
Verganti, R. (2008), Design, Meanings and Radical Innovation: A Meta-Model and a Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25. 436 - 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vezzoli, C. & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for Environmental Sustainability, 1st edition. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
Vilochani, S., McAloone, T. C. & Pigosso, D.C.A. (2023). Management Practices for Sustainable Product Development: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED23), Bordeaux, France, 24-28 July 2023.Google Scholar
Yang, C.J. & Chen, J.L. (2012). Forecasting the design of eco-products by integrating TRIZ evolution patterns with CBR and Simple LCA methods. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 2884-2892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar