Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:09:39.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DOUGHNUT AS A SUPPORT OF THE “SUSTAINABLE VALUE ENGINEERING”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Alexis Lalevée ,
Nadège Troussier  and
Eric Blanco
Alexis Lalevée*
Affiliation:
UR InSyTE, Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10010 Troyes, France; Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP1, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France; Euro Contrôle Projet (ECP) Company, 13000 Aix-en-Provence, France;
Nadège Troussier
Affiliation:
UR InSyTE, Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10010 Troyes, France; Arts et Métiers - campus de Paris - ENSAM, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France;
Eric Blanco
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP1, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France; Ecole de l'Air BA 701 13661 Salon Air, France
*
Lalevée, Alexis, University of Technology of Troyes, France, alexis.lalevee@utt.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Societies are faced to ecological crises and widening disparities. This has to be integrated in the management of complex projects as they are increasingly complex and impactful. Value Analysis can serve assessing the value of a project i.e. knowing how the project will be perceived by the Stakeholders. It is a collaborative approach that helps make decisions in the early stages of a complex project.

This paper aims at demonstrating that a new “Sustainable Value Analysis” (SVA) provides a decision-making support toward sustainability. SVA uses a new definition of Value and a set of indicators based on the Doughnut.

Methods for the introduction of sustainability in the upstream design phases have limitations, which are highlighted in the literature review. Yet, the potentials of value approaches can be shown. Based on this analysis, an illustrative case is proposed to demonstrate how to integrate the ecological and social dimensions in a classical Value Engineering approach to determine SVA. The article concludes that the SVA allows identifying and characterizing the sustainable dimensions of Value, through a collective approach based on Stakeholders.

Keywords

ComplexityCollaborative designDesign engineeringStakeholderDoughnut
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3365 - 3374
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Allais, R. (2015) Transition systémique pour un développement durable: entre conception et territoire, PhD Thesis, Université de Technologie de Troyes. Available at: http://sci-hub.cc/ http://www.theses.fr/2015TROY0024.Google Scholar
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016) ‘Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions’, Design Studies. Elsevier, 47, pp. 118–163. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.DESTUD.2016.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, R. et al. (2019) ‘Value Engineering as a Specialty for Systems Engineering: Exploring Opportunities’, Insight, 22(1), pp. 41–44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/inst.12237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, K. B. and Lindbergh, L. B. (2010) ‘The bottom line on project complexity: Applying a New Complexity Model’, in PMI® Global Congress 2010—North America, Washington, DC. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, pp. 1–16. Available at: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-complexity-model-competency-standard-6586.Google Scholar
ISO/CD 26000 (2010) ISO 26000:2010 - Guidance on social responsibility.Google Scholar
Kolltveit, B. J. and Grønhaug, K. (2004) ‘The importance of the early phase: The case of construction and building projects’, International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), pp. 545–551. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalevée, A. et al. (2020) ‘The interest of an evolution of Value Management methodology in Complex Technical Projects for improving Project Management’, Procedia CIRP, ‘Life Cycle Engineering’ 2020 conference, 90, pp. 411–415. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.108.Google Scholar
Lalevée, A. et al. (2021a) ‘Function analysis: going forward in value analysis’, Procedia CIRP, ‘Cirp Design’ 2021 conference. Elsevier B.V., 100, pp. 655–659. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.139.Google Scholar
Lalevée, A. et al. (2021b) ‘Value Analysis to improve System Architecting’, in International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21). Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 3389–3397. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laratte, B. and Guillaume, B. (2014) ‘Epistemic and methodological challenges of dynamic environmental assessment: A case-study with energy production from solar cells’, Key Engineering Materials, 572(1), pp. 535–538. https://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.572.535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyneis, J. M., Cooper, K. G. and Els, S. A. (2001) ‘Strategic management of complex projects: A case study using system dynamics’, System Dynamics Review, 17(3), pp. 237–260. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, J., Reed, D. L. and Leader, P. (2006) ‘Value Engineering Handbook’, (September), p. 146.Google Scholar
Messmann, L. et al. (2020) ‘How to quantify social impacts in strategic supply chain optimization: State of the art’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 257, p. 120459. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millet, D. et al. (2004) ‘Integration of New Dimensions in Design Process - Application to the environmental dimension’, in Tichkiewitch, S. and (eds), B. D. (eds) Methods and Tools for Co-operative and Integrated Design. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 209–222. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2256-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, D. W. et al. (2018) ‘A Good Life for all within planetary boundaries’, Nature Sustainability, 1(2), pp. 88–95. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raworth, K. (2012) ‘A safe and just space for humanity - Can we live within the Doughnut?’, Oxfam Discussion Papers. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781849776257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raworth, K. (2017) A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity's compass in the 21st century, www.thelancet.com/planetary-health. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30028-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöggl, J. P., Baumgartner, R. J. and Hofer, D. (2016) ‘Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 1602–1617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visentin, C. et al. (2020) ‘Life cycle sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review through the application perspective, indicators, and methodologies’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 270. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L. et al. (2019) ‘Integrated design of transport infrastructure and public spaces considering human behavior: A review of state-of-the-art methods and tools’, Frontiers of Architectural Research. Elsevier, 8(4), pp. 429–453. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.FOAR.2019.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar