Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:09:31.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EEG VARIATIONS AS A PROXY OF THE QUALITY OF THE DESIGN OUTCOME

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Shumin Li ,
Niccolò Becattini  and
Gaetano Cascini
Shumin Li*
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Niccolò Becattini
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Gaetano Cascini
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
*
Li, Shumin, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, shumin.li@polimi.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents an EEG (Electroencephalography) study that explores the correlation between the EEG variation across design stages and the quality of the design outcomes. The brain activations of 33 volunteers with engineering backgrounds were recorded while performing a design task using a morphological table to develop an amphibious bike. The EEG variations from the analysing/selecting stage to the illustrating stage were analysed based on the EEG frequency band and channel sets. A significant correlation between the detail level of the design outcome and the power variation mode was observed in theta, alpha and gamma bands, each involving different channel sets. Compared to the assessment results from two evaluators, using EEG variations as a proxy of the detail level of the design outcome could reach a maximum accuracy of 0.727, precision of 0.765, and recall of 0.889. These results also provide suggestions on the selection of the frequency bands and channel sets to achieve better prediction performance according to each metric.

Keywords

ElectroencephalographyHuman behaviour in designDesign cognitionDesign QualityResearch methodologies and methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1535 - 1544
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Adolphy, S., Gericke, K. and Blessing, L. (2009), “Estimation and its Role in Engineering Design - An Introduction”, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 255–266.Google Scholar
Benedek, M., Bergner, S., Könen, T., Fink, A. and Neubauer, A.C. (2011), “EEG alpha synchronization is related to top-down processing in convergent and divergent thinking”, Neuropsychologia, Pergamon, Vol. 49 No. 12, pp. 3505–3511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delorme, A. and Makeig, S. (2004), “EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Elsevier, Vol. 134 No. 1, pp. 9–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fink, A., Grabner, R.H., Neuper, C. and Neubauer, A.C. (2005), “EEG alpha band dissociation with increasing task demands”, Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 252–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fink, A. and Neubauer, A.C. (2006), “EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence”, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 46–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foldes, S.T. and Taylor, D.M. (2013), “Speaking and cognitive distractions during EEG-based brain control of a virtual neuroprosthesis-arm”, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 3–6, https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Y., Ouyang, J., Wang, H., Zhang, J., Liu, A., Min, X. and Du, X. (2022), “Design Meets Neuroscience: An Electroencephalogram Study of Design Thinking in Concept Generation Phase”, Frontiers in Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, F.C. and Gerloff, C. (2006), “Chapter 15 Interregional long-range and short-range synchrony: a basis for complex sensorimotor processing”, Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 159 No. 06, pp. 223–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59015-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaarsveld, S., Fink, A., Rinner, M., Schwab, D., Benedek, M. and Lachmann, T. (2015), “Intelligence in creative processes: An EEG study”, Intelligence, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 49, pp. 171–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.012.Google Scholar
Jansson, D.G. and Smith, S.M. (1991), “Design fixation”, Design Studies, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, W. and Zeng, Y. (2021), “EEG signals respond differently to idea generation, idea evolution and evaluation in a loosely controlled creativity experiment”, Scientific Reports, Nature Publishing Group UK, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81655-0.Google Scholar
Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M. and Hanslmayr, S. (2006), “Chapter 10 Upper alpha ERD and absolute power: their meaning for memory performance”, Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 159, pp. 151–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59010-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, A., Chong, D. and Batarseh, F.A. (2020), “Foundations of data imbalance and solutions for a data democracy”, Data Democracy, Elsevier, pp. 83–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818366-3.00005-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Z., Sourina, O., Wang, L. and Liu, Y. (2016), “Real-time EEG-based emotion monitoring using stable features”, Visual Computer, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 347–358, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-015-1183-y.Google Scholar
Li, S., Becattini, N. and Cascini, G. (2021), “Correlating Design Performance To Eeg Activation: Early Evidence From Experimental Data”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1 No. AUGUST, pp. 771–780, https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsey, J.S., Clauss, E.F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J.T., Wood, K.L. and Markman, A.B. (2011), “An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 133 No. 3, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y.-C., Chang, C.-C., Yang, Y.-H.S. and Liang, C. (2018), “Spontaneous analogising caused by text stimuli in design thinking: differences between higher- and lower-creativity groups”, Cognitive Neurodynamics, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 55–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-017-9454-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes da Silva, F. (1991), “Neural mechanisms underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks”, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 79 No. 2, pp. 81–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(91)90044-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes da Silva, F.H. (2006), “Chapter 1 Event-related neural activities: what about phase?”, Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 159, pp. 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59001-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukacevic, F., Li, S., Becattini, N. and Škec, S. (2022), “Comparing EEG Brain Power of Mechanical Engineers in 3D CAD Modelling from 2D and 3D Representations”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2 No. May, pp. 901–910, https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J., Hirst, R. and MacAskill, M. (2022), Building Experiments in PsychoPy, 2nd ed., SAGE Publications Inc, London.Google Scholar
Pfurtscheller, G. and Da Silva, Lopes, F.H. (1999), “Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles”, Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 110 No. 11, pp. 1842–1857, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfurtscheller, G., Neuper, C. and Kalcher, J. (1993), “40-Hz oscillations during motor behavior in man”, Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 164 No. 1–2, pp. 179–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(93)90886-P.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfurtscheller, G. and Silva, F.L. da. (2017), EEG Event-Related Desynchronization and Event-Related Synchronization, edited by Schomer, D.L. and Lopes da Silva, F.H., Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190228484.003.0040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Philiastides, M.G. and Sajda, P. (2009), “Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106 No. 16, pp. 6539–6544, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812589106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, W.J. and Cole, H.W. (1985), “EEG Alpha Activity Reflects Attentional Demands, and Beta Activity Reflects Emotional and Cognitive Processes”, Science, Vol. 228 No. 4700, pp. 750–752, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3992243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeland, A., Manca, L., Kirchner, F. and Kirchner, E.A. (2015), “Spatio-temporal Comparison between ERD/ERS and MRCP-based Movement Prediction”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Bio-Inspired Systems and Signal Processing, SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, pp. 219–226, https://doi.org/10.5220/0005214002190226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, J.M. (2013), Atlas of EEG Patterns, 2nd ed., Lippincott Williams and Wilkins., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Stipacek, A., Grabner, R.H., Neuper, C., Fink, A. and Neubauer, A.C. (2003), “Sensitivity of human EEG alpha band desynchronization to different working memory components and increasing levels of memory load”, Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 353 No. 3, pp. 193–196, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2003.09.044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieira, S., Benedek, M., Gero, J., Li, S. and Cascini, G. (2022), “Design spaces and EEG frequency band power in constrained and open design”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 193–221, https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2022.2048697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar