Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:07:10.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors that determine design similarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Kazuko Sakamoto  and
Yuya Kinzuka
Kazuko Sakamoto*
Affiliation:
Hosei University, Japan
Yuya Kinzuka
Affiliation:
Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan
*
k.sakamoto@hosei.ac.jp

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years, the importance of design has been pointed out as a source of competitive advantage. However, creating a great design also increases the risk of copy products being created. In this study, we used an approach based on visual information and conducted an international comparative judgment survey of elements considered to be similar within products.

Keywords

design analysishuman behaviourproduct design
Type
Design Methods and Tools
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 735 - 744
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Imai, Mutsumi, and Gentner, Dedre. "A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. "Cognition 62.2 (1997): 169-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00784-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimchi, Ruth, and Palmer, Stephen E.. "Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8.4 (1982): 521. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.8.4.521Google ScholarPubMed
Kinchla, Ronald A., and Wolfe, Jeremy M.. "The order of visual processing:“Top-down,”“bottom-up,” or “middle-out”. "Perception & psychophysics 25 (1979): 225-231. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Maryanne. "Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. "Memory & Cognition 7 (1979): 476-484. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, T. "Effects of mood on visual cognition of Navon stimuli of different sizes: The usefulness of threshold as an index. "Jpn J Cogn Psychol 7 (2010): 79. https://doi.org/10.5265/jcogpsy.7.79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navon, David. "Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. "Cognitive psychology 9.3 (1977): 353-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, Ara, et al. "Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. "Cognitive science 26.5 (2002): 653-684. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoji, Yamada. "Introduction to the Science of Similarity and Information Culture of Mimicry" Departmental Bulletin Paper, International Research Center for Japanese Studies (2000): 13-29. https://doi.org/10.15055/00000720CrossRefGoogle Scholar