Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:40:36.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FEATURE-BASED METHOD TO FORMALISE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING RELATED DATA AT THE MESOSCALE BASED ON A MEREOTOPOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Chloe Douin ,
Elise Gruhier ,
Robin Kromer ,
Olivier Christmann  and
Nicolas Perry
Chloe Douin*
Affiliation:
I2M UMR 5295, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Esplanade des Arts et Métiers, 33400 Talence, France
Elise Gruhier
Affiliation:
I2M UMR 5295, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Esplanade des Arts et Métiers, 33400 Talence, France
Robin Kromer
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, I2M UMR 5295, 33500 Gradignan, France
Olivier Christmann
Affiliation:
LAMPA, Arts et Metiers ParisTech, 2 Boulevard du Ronceray, 49000 Angers, France
Nicolas Perry
Affiliation:
I2M UMR 5295, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Esplanade des Arts et Métiers, 33400 Talence, France
*
Douin, Chloe, I2M UMR 5295, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Esplanade des Arts et Métiers, 33400 Talence, France, France, chloe.douin@ensam.eu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Research on additive manufacturing has highlighted methods and guidelines to optimise the design process and improving finished product quality. There is still room for improvement in making AM as reliable as more traditional processes when considering industrial use. In terms of manufacturing, managing print parameters properly can improve reproducibility and repeatability of a part, in addition to its fidelity to the basic geometric model. However, a topological optimised geometry requires more than good parameterisation. Efforts are therefore being made to formalise knowledge so that it is explicit and accessible to designers. This paper proposes an approach based on the spatio-temporal evolution of a geometry during printing to quantify data at the meso scale. Previous studies have been conducted on the description of features in time, space and space-time, and on the influence of their arrangement within a part. Building on this work, a parameterised test specimen was designed to measure the quantitative impact of these arrangements on the final product. The method is then presented and illustrated through a case study to help the designer with quantitative predictive values of geometric parameters.

Keywords

Additive ManufacturingDesign for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)Design methodsMereotopologyDesign of Experiments
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1865 - 1874
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahtiluoto, M., Ellman, A. U. and Coatanea, E. (2019), “Model for Evaluating Additive Manufacturing Feasibility in End-Use Production”, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Vol. 1, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 799–808. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. F. (1983), “Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals”, Readings in Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems, Elsevier, pp. 361–372. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-1447-4.50033-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyard, N., Christmann, O., Rivette, M. and Richir, S. (2019), “A design methodology for additive manufacturing applied to fused deposition modelling process”, Mechanics & Industry, Vol. 20 No. 6, p. 608. http://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2019040.Google Scholar
Bracken, J., Pomorski, T., Armstrong, C., Prabhu, R., Simpson, T. W., Jablokow, K., Cleary, W., and Meisel, N. A. (2020), “Design for metal powder bed fusion: The geometry for additive part selection (GAPS) worksheet”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 35, p. 101163. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budinoff, H. D. and McMains, S. (2021), “Will it print: a manufacturability toolbox for 3D printing”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 613–630. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-021-00786-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douin, C., Gruhier, E., Kromer, R., Christmann, O. and Perry, N. (2022), “A method for design for additive manufacturing rules formulation through Spatio-temporal process discretization”, Procedia CIRP, 32nd CIRP Design Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaoui, S., Ledoux, Y., Vignat, F., Museau, M., Vo, T., Villeneuve, F. and Ballu, A. (2020), “Analysis of geometrical defects in overhang fabrications in electron beam melting based on thermomechanical simulations and experimental validations”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 36, p. 101557. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandvallet, C., Pourroy, F., Prudhomme, G. and Vignat, F. (2017), “From elicitation to structuring of additive manufacturing knowledge”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 6: Design Information and Knowledge. Vancouver, Canada, pp. 141–150.Google Scholar
Gruhier, E., Demoly, F., Dutartre, O., Abboudi, S. and Gomes, S. (2015), “A formal ontology-based spatiotemporal mereotopology for integrated product design and assembly sequence planning”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 495–512. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, T. H. and Kim, K.-Y. (2015), “Spatiotemporal Discrete Mereotopology to Support Assembled Additive Manufacturing”, Society for Design and Process Science, Dallas Fort Worth, p. 6.Google Scholar
Mbow, M. M., Marin, P. R., Perry, N., Vignat, F. and Grandvallet, C. (2021), “Knowledge-based evaluation of part orientation desirability in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Vol. 1. Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 1957–1966. http://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.457.Google Scholar
Rupal, B. S., Ahmad, R. and Qureshi, A. J. (2018), “Feature-Based Methodology for Design of Geometric Benchmark Test Artifacts for Additive Manufacturing Processes”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, pp. 84–89. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Y., Zhang, Y., Baek, S., De Backer, W. and Harik, R. (2018), “Manufacturability analysis for additive manufacturing using a novel feature recognition technique”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 941–952. http://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2018.1462574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. (1996), “Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries.”, Data and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 20, pp. 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas-Seale, L. E., Kirkman-Brown, J. C., Attallah, M. M., Espino, D. M. and Shepherd, D. E. (2018), “The barriers to the progression of additive manufacture: Perspectives from UK industry”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 198, pp. 104–118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R. I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., Schulz, J., Graf, P., Ahuja, B. and Martina, F. (2016), “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 737–760. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaneker, T., Bernard, A., Moroni, G., Gibson, I. and Zhang, Y. (2020), “Design for additive manufacturing: Framework and methodology”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 69 No. 2, pp. 578–599. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorkapic, N., Pjevic, M., Popovic, M., Slavkovic, N. and Zivanovic, S. (2020), “An additive manufacturing benchmark artifact and deviation measurement method”, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 3015– 3026. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0633-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Z., Pradel, P., Bibb, R. and Moultrie, J. (2017), “A framework for designing end use products for direct manufacturing using additive manufacturing technologies”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 5: Design for X, Design to X. Vancouver, Canada, pp. 327–336.Google Scholar