Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:58:28.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FORMULATING GUIDELINES FOR THE SYSTEMATIC SET-UP OF EXPERIENTIAL MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION STUDIES: A CASE OF PLASTIC DEMONSTRATORS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Lore Veelaert ,
Ingrid Moons  and
Els Du Bois
Lore Veelaert*
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Faculty of Design Sciences, Department of Product Development;
Ingrid Moons
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Faculty of Design Sciences, Department of Product Development; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business Economics, Department of Marketing
Els Du Bois
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Faculty of Design Sciences, Department of Product Development;
*
Veelaert, Lore, University of Antwerp, Product Development, Belgium, lore.veelaert@uantwerpen.be

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Materials can be considered from a technical and experiential perspective. However, the latter perspective is more complex to study systematically. Four intertwined experiential levels describe the overall materials experience: sensorial, interpretive, affective, and performative level. Building upon the need in experiential material characterization for comparable physical material representations to enable within-material-class comparisons and the inclusion of extensive user aspects, this paper sums up the reasoning process regarding the understanding and design of an experimental set-up and its parameters of a specific case. The case objective is to formulate guidelines for the designer/researcher to set up experiential material characterization experiments with (i) plastic demonstrator forms and (ii) by consumers. Following elements are discussed: Assessors, Stimuli, Interaction Modalities, Dependent variables, Method, and Practical considerations. Next, future experiments can be carried out in order to generate holistic plastic material data on a larger scale, that can be collected in an experiential database and used by designers throughout the design process.

Keywords

Multisensory product experienceExperiential material characterizationMaterials experienceEmotional designHuman behaviour in design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1587 - 1596
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Angelini, L., Lalanne, D., van den Hoven, E., Khaled, O.A. and Mugellini, E. (2015), “Move, hold and touch: A framework for Tangible gesture interactive systems”, Machines, MDPI AG, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 173–207. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/machines3030173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M.F. and Johnson, K. (2010), Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design, Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-26530-5Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2019), “How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables”, Journal of Cognition, Ubiquity Press, Ltd., Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1–38. https://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camere, S. and Karana, E. (2018), “Experiential characterization of materials: Toward a toolkit”, International Conference on Design Research Society (DRS), Limmerick, Ireland, 25-28th June. https://dx.doi.org/10.21606/dma.2017.508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Gneezy, U. and Kuhn, M.A. (2012), “Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, North-Holland, Vol. 81 No. 1, pp. 1–8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.T. and Chuang, M.C. (2014), “The study of tactile feeling and It's expressing vocabulary”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 675–684. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleaver, G. (2018), “Ranking and Rank-Rating”, Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp. 447–491. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118991657.ch12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J. and Clarkson, P.J. (2009), “Shaping things: intended consumer response and the other determinants of product form”, Design Studies, Elsevier, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 224–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crippa, G., Rognoli, V. and Levi, M. (2012), “Materials, and emotions: A study on the relations between materials and emotions in industrial products”, 8th International Design and Emotion Conference, London. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutkosky, M.R. (1989), “On Grasp Choice, Grasp Models, and the Design of Hands for Manufacturing Tasks”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 269–279. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/70.34763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Olivo, P., Curto, B.J. Del, Faucheu, J., Lafon, D., BASSEREAU, J.-F. and Sébastien, L. (2013), “Sensory Metrology: When Emotions and Experiences Contribute to Design”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED13 (Vol. 7 DS75-07), Seoul, Korea, 19-22th August, pp. 507–516.Google Scholar
Ndengue, Dacleu, Juganaru-Mathieu, J., , M. and Faucheu, J. (2017), “Material perception and material identification in product design”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 8, Vancouver, pp. 429–437.Google Scholar
Dehn, J. (2014), “Conception and realization of a sustainable materials library”, in Karana, E., Pedgley, O. and Rognoli, V. (Eds.), Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, pp. 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation and McKinsey & Company. (2012), Towards the Circular Economy, edited by McKinsey & Company, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Faucheu, J., Caroli, A., Del Curto, B. and Delafosse, D. (2015), “Experimental Setup for Visual and Tactile Evaluation of Materials and Products Through Napping® Procedure”, in Christian, Weber, Stephan, Husung, Gaetano, Cascini, Marco, CantaMESsa, Dorian, Marjanovic, M.B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy, pp. 129–138.Google Scholar
Fisher, T.H. (2004), “What We Touch, Touches Us: Materials, Affects, and Affordances”, Design Issues, MIT Press - Journals, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 20–31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0747936042312066.Google Scholar
Fleming, R.W. (2014), “Visual perception of materials and their properties”, Vision Research, Pergamon, Vol. 94, pp. 62–75. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.VISRES.2013.11.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, R.W. (2017), “Material Perception”, Annual Review of Vision Science, Annual Reviews Inc., Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 365–388. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giaccardi, E. and Karana, E. (2015), “Foundations of Materials Experience”, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 2447–2456. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, A.D., Jones, M. and Zuo, H. (2012), “Sensory perception in materials selection for industrial/product design”, International Journal of Designed Objects, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 17–31. https://dx.doi.org/10.18848/2325-1379/cgp/v06i03/38662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, S.H., Chuang, M.C. and Chang, C.C. (2000), “A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 375–391. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00026-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahan, A., Ismail, M.Y., Sapuan, S.M. and Mustapha, F. (2010), “Material screening and choosing methods - A review”, Materials and Design, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 696–705. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E. (2009), Meanings of Materials (Doctoral Dissertation), Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Karana, E. (2010), “How do Materials Obtain Their Meanings?”, METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 271–285. https://dx.doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2010.2.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E. (2012), “Characterization of ‘natural’ and ‘high-quality’ materials to improve perception of bio-plastics”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, Vol. 37, pp. 316–325. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E. and Hekkert, P. (2010), “User-Material-Product Interrelationships in Attributing Meanings”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 3 No. 43-52, available at: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/635/312 (accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar
Karana, E., Hekkert, P. and Kandachar, P. (2009), “Assessing material properties on sensorial scales”, 2009 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2009, Vol. 2, American Society of Mechanical Engineers,U.S. (2009), San Diego, California, USA, 30th August-2th September, pp. 911–916. https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2009-86756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E., Hekkert, P. and Kandachar, P. (2010), “A tool for meaning driven materials selection”, Materials and Design, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 2932–2941. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E. and Nijkamp, N. (2014), “Fiberness, reflectiveness and roughness in the characterization of natural and high quality materials”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, Vol. 68, pp. 252–260. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E., Pedgley, O. and Rognoli, V. (2014), Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design, 1st ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, available at:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-02198-9.Google Scholar
Karana, E., Pedgley, O. and Rognoli, V. (2015), “On materials experience”, Design Issues. https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, S.E., Hort, J. and Hollowood, T. (2018), Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation, edited by Kemp, S.E., Hort, J. and Hollowood, T., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118991657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledahudec, J., Pilková, L. and Pokorný, J. (1992), “Comparison of structured and unstructured graphical scales for the evaluation of sensory quality”, Food / Nahrung, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 96–98. doi:http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/food.19920360116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederman, S.J. and Klatzky, R.L. (2009), “Haptic perception: A tutorial”, Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Springer. https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.7.1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilley, D., Smalley, G., Bridgens, B., Wilson, G.T. and Balasundaram, K. (2016), “Cosmetic obsolescence? User perceptions of new and artificially aged materials”, Materials & Design, Elsevier, Vol. 101, pp. 355–365. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2016.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín, R., Iseringhausen, J., Weinmann, M. and Hullin, M.B. (2015), “Multimodal perception of material properties”, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception - SAP ’15, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 33–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2804408.2804420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugge, R., Schifferstein, H.N.J. and Schoormans, J.P.L. (2005), “Product Attachment and Product Lifetime: the Role of Personality Congruity and Fashion”, ACR European Advances, Vol. E-07, available at: http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/13725/eacr/vol7/E-07 (accessed 11 April 2019).Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. (2004), Emotional Design - Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-4726.2004.133_10.xGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J. and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning, USA: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Pagès, J., Cadoret, M. and Lê, S. (2010), “The Sorted Napping: A New Holistic Approach in Sensory Evaluation”, Journal of Sensory Studies, Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111), Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 637–658. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00292.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petiot, J.-F. and Yannou, B. (2004), “Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Elsevier, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 507–525. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ERGON.2003.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piselli, A., Baxter, W., Simonato, M., Del Curto, B. and Aurisicchio, M. (2018), “Development and evaluation of a methodology to integrate technical and sensorial properties in materials selection”, Materials & Design, Elsevier, Vol. 153, pp. 259–272. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2018.04.081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinbach, H.C., Giacalone, D., Ribeiro, L.M., Bredie, W.L.P. and Frøst, M.B. (2014), “Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and Napping®”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 32, pp. 160–166. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rognoli, V., Salvia, G. and Levi, M. (2011), “The aesthetic of interaction with materials for design: the bioplastic's identity”, Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces - DPPI ’11, ACM Press, New York, USA, p. 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2347504.2347540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvia, G., Ostuzzi, F., Rognoli, V. and Levi, M. (2011), “The value of imperfection in sustainable design: the emotional tie with perfectible artefacts for longer lifespan”, Sustainability in Design: Now! Challenges and Opportunities Of Design Research, Education and Practice in the XXI Century, Abstracts, Bangalore, India, 29th September-1th October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauerwein, M., Karana, E. and Rognoli, V. (2017), “Revived Beauty: Research into Aesthetic Appreciation of Materials to Valorise Materials from Waste”, Sustainability, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Vol. 9 No. 4, p. 529. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9040529.Google Scholar
Schifferstein, H. and Wastiels, L. (2014), “Sensing materials: Exploring the building blocks for experiential design”, in Karana, E., Pedgley, O., Rognoli, V. (Ed.), Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design, 1st ed., Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 15–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-099359-1.00002-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schifferstein, H.N.J. (2010), “From salad to bowl: The role of sensory analysis in product experience research”, Food Quality and Preference, Elsevier, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 1059–1067. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2010.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidel, J.L. and Stone, H. (1993), “The role of sensory evaluation in the food industry”, Food Quality and Preference, Elsevier, Vol. 4 No. 1-2, pp. 65–73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(93)90314-V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kar, Sitanshu Sekhar and Ramalingam, A.. (2013), “Is 30 the magic number? issues in sample size estimation”, National Journal of Community Medicine, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 175–179.Google Scholar
Varela, P. and Ares, G. (2012), “Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization”, Food Research International, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 893–908. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veelaert, L., Du Bois, E., Moons, I. and Karana, E. (2020), “Experiential characterization of materials in product design: A literature review”, Materials & Design, Elsevier, Vol. 190, p. 108543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veelaert, L., Du Bois, E., Moons, I., De Pelsmacker, P., Hubo, S. and Ragaert, K. (2020), “The Identity of Recycled Plastics: A Vocabulary of Perception”, Sustainability, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Vol. 12 No. 5, p. 1953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051953Google Scholar
Veelaert, L., Moons, I., Van Gogh, D., Vleugels, J. and Du Bois, E. (under review). “A Physical Demonstrator Form for Experiential Material Characterization”, International Journal of Designed Objects.Google Scholar
Veelaert, L., Moons, I., Rohaert, S. and Du Bois, E. (2019), “A Neutral Form for Experiential Material Characterisation”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1743–1752. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vezzoli, C. (2014), “The ‘Material’ Side of Design for Sustainability”, in Karana, E., Pedgley, O., Rognoli, V., E. (Ed.), Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK, pp. 105–121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-099359-1.00008-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wastiels, L., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Heylighen, A. and Wouters, I. (2012a), “Red or rough, what makes materials warmer?”, Materials & Design, Elsevier, Vol. 42, pp. 441–449. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2012.06.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wastiels, L., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Heylighen, A. and Wouters, I. (2012b), “Relating material experience to technical parameters: A case study on visual and tactile warmth perception of indoor wall materials”, Building and Environment, Pergamon, Vol. 49, pp. 359–367. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2011.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, S., Wongsriruksa, S., Howes, P., Gamester, R., Witchel, H., Conreen, M., Laughlin, Z., et al. (2016), “Design tools for interdisciplinary translation of material experiences”, Materials & Design, Vol. 90, pp. 1228–1237. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson Vanvoorhis, C.R. and Morgan, B.L. (2007), Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, Vol. 3. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043CrossRefGoogle Scholar