Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:18:03.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FUNCTION INTEGRATION IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING: A REVIEW OF APPROACHES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Gregory-Jamie Tüzün ,
Daniel Roth  and
Matthias Kreimeyer
Gregory-Jamie Tüzün*
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart
Daniel Roth
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart
Matthias Kreimeyer
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart
*
Tüzün, Gregory-Jamie, University of Stuttgart, Germany, gregory-jamie.tuezuen@iktd.uni-stuttgart.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper provides an overview of established approaches for function integration in additive manufacturing and critically compares their capabilities. One of the decisive factors is how functions and structures are addressed. This is necessary because function integration - among many others - affects material decisions and the manufacturing process chain. It is one of many reasons to rethink the product architecture and a way to support the design of resource-efficient products. Various strategies for function integration exist. However, there are currently no approaches in additive manufacturing that provide systematic support for early function integration.

A systematic literature review identified 21 unique approaches. All approaches were categorized according to their abstraction level within a product architecture and their design type to be supported. They were then compared on the basis of their categorization, design objective and strategy for function integration to allow for a better understanding of when to use the approaches in research and practice. Key findings and considerations for adapting function integration approaches to early design stages are presented. In addition, several research gaps were identified.

Keywords

Additive ManufacturingProduct architectureFunction integrationConceptual designSolution principles
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2005 - 2014
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

de Almeida Biolchini, J.C., Mian, P.G., Natali, A.C.C., Conte, T.U. and Travassos, G.H. (2007), “Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 133–151. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2006.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amanatidis, G. (2022), Resource efficiency and the circular economy. [online] European Union. Available at: (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_2.5.6.pdf) (20 September 2022).Google Scholar
Bellacicca, A., Santaniello, T. and Milani, P. (2018), “Embedding electronics in 3D printed structures by combining fused filament fabrication and supersonic cluster beam deposition”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 24, pp. 60–66. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswal, R., Venkatesh, V. and Arumaikkannu, G. (2019), “Investigation on part consolidation for additive manufacturing with SIMP method”, Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 46, pp. 4954–4961. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.381.Google Scholar
Chadha, C., Crowe, K.A., Carmen, C.L. and Patterson, A.E. (2018), “Exploring an AM-Enabled Combination-of-Functions Approach for Modular Product Design”, Designs, Vol. 2 No. 4, Article 37. http://doi.org/10.3390/designs2040037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. (2001), “Sharing in Design – Categories, Importance, and Issues”, The 13th International Conference on Engineering Design, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 21–23 August 2001, pp. 563–570.Google Scholar
Chiang, R., Wei, C., Cheng, Y and Wei, C. (2020), “Attractiveness maximisation model for designing product complexity”, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, Vol. 31 No. 15-16, pp. 1829–1840. http://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1522246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crispo, L. and Kim, I.Y. (2020), “Assembly Level Topology Optimization Towards a Part Consolidation Algorithm for Additive Manufacturing”, AIAA SciTechForum, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6–10 January 2020, American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp. 1–9. http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crispo, L. and Kim, I.Y. (2021), “Part consolidation for additive manufacturing: A multilayered topology optimization approach”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 122 No. 18, Article 4987. http://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Despeisse, M. and Ford, S. (2015), “The Role of Additive Manufacturing in Improving Resource Efficiency and Sustainability”, The International Federation for Information Processing, Tokyo, Japan, 7–9 September 2015, Springer Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London, pp. 129–136. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22759-715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrelts, E., Roth, D. and Binz, H. (2021), “Concept of a design catalog for the function-integrated design of additively manufactured components”, Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung, Online, 20 May 2021, University of Stuttgart, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, P.K., Kain, H., Jahanbekam, S. and Behdad, S. (2018), “Graph Partitioning Technique to Identify Physically Integrated Design Concepts”, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Quebec, Canada, 26–29 August 2018, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, E., Estrada, S., Gopalakrishnan, P.K., Jahanbekam, S. and Behdad, S. (2022), “A Graph Partitioning Technique to Optimize the Physical Integration of Functional Requirements for Axiomatic Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 144 No. 5, Article 51402. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haruna, A. and Jiang, P. (2020), “A Design for Additive Manufacturing Framework: Product Function Integration and Structure Simplification”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 77–82. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.04.127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, D., Blake Perez, K., Anderson, D., Jensen, D., Camburn, B. and Wood, K. (2021), “Design Principles for Additive Manufacturing: Leveraging Crowdsourced Design Repositories”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 143 No. 7, Article 72005. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayapal, J., Kumaraguru, S. and Varadarajan, S., “Part Consolidation in Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Two-Level Approach Using Complexity Metrics”, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 222, pp. 881–892. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspar, J., Reichwein, J., Kirchner, E. and Vielhaber, M. (2019), “Integrated Design Pattern Matrix for Additive Manufacturing – A Holistic Potential Analysis for Systemic Product and Production Engineering”, 29th CIRP Design Conference, Póvoa de Varzim, Portgal, 8–10 May 2019, Elsevier B.V., pp. 480–485. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. and Moon, S.K. (2020), “A Part Consolidation Design Method for Additive Manufacturing based on Product Disassembly Complexity”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 10 No. 3, Article 1100. http://doi.org/10.3390/app10031100.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Tang, Y. and Rosen, D.W. (2019), “Design for additive manufacturing: Simplification of product architecture by part consolidation for the lifecycle”, 30th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, 12–14 August 2019, University of Texas at Austin, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Krause, D., Vietor, T., Inkermann, D., Hanna, M., Richter, T. and Wortmann, N. (2021), “Produktarchitektur”, In: Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 335–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumke, M., Watschke, H., Hartogh, P., Bavendiek, A.-K. and Vietor, T. (2018), “Methods and tools for identifying and leveraging additive manufacturing design potentials”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 481–493. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0399-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laverne, F., Segonds, F., Anwer, N. and Le Coq, M. (2014), “DFAM in the design process: A proposal of classification to foster early design stages”, CONFERE’14, Sibenik, Croatia, 3–4 Juli 2014, Article 12.Google Scholar
Leutenecker-Twelsiek, B., Klahn, C. and Meboldt, M. (2016), “Considering Part Orientation in Design for Additive Manufacturing”, 26th CIRP Design Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 15–17 June 2016, Elsevier B.V., pp. 408–413. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.016.Google Scholar
Lindemann, C., Reiher, T., Jahnke, U. and Koch, R. (2015), “Towards a sustainable and economic selection of part candidates for additive manufacturing”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 216–227. http://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J. (2016), “Guidelines for AM part consolidation”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 133–141. http://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1175154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Z., Jung, S., Kara, L.B. and Whitefoot, K.S. (2019), “Optimization of Part Consolidation for Minimum Production Costs and Time Using Additive Manufacturing”, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Anaheim, California, USA, 18–21 August 2019, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. http://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Z., Jung, S., Kara, L.B. and Whitefoot, K.S. (2020), “Optimization of Part Consolidation for Minimum Production Costs and Time Using Additive Manufacturing”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 7, 072001. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.H. (2007), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, London. http://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, W. and Lu, W.F. (2021), “A kinematics-aware part clustering approach for part integration using additive manufacturing”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 72, Article 102171. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichwein, J., Rudolph, K., Geis, J. and Kirchner, E. (2021), “Adapting product architecture to additive manufacturing through consolidation and separation”, 31st CIRP Conference on Design, Online, 19–21 May 2021, Elsevier B.V., pp. 79–84. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, T., Watschke, H., Inkermann, D. and Vietor, T. (2016), “Produktarchitekturgestaltung unter Berücksichtigung additiver Fertigungsverfahren”, Entwerfen Entwickeln Erleben 2016, Dresden, Germany, 31 June–1 July 2016, TUDpress, Dresden, Germany, pp. 375–390.Google Scholar
Rodrigue, H. and Rivette, M. (2010), “An Assembly-Level Design for Additive Manufacturing Methodology”, IDMME-Virtual Concept, Bordeaux, France, October 2010. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0169-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W. and Stucker, B. (2012), Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing, Springer, New York et al. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9.Google Scholar
Schmelzle, J., Kline, E.V., Dickman, C.J., Reutzel, E.W., Jones, G. and Simpson, T.W. (2015), “(Re)Designing for Part Consolidation: Understanding the Challenges of Metal Additive Manufacturing”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 11, Article 111404. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, D., Kim, S. and Jeong, B. (2021), “Sustainable part consolidation model for customized products in closed-loop supply chain with additive manufacturing hub”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 37, Article 101643. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sossou, G., Demoly, F., Montavon, G. and Gomes, S. (2018), “An additive manufacturing oriented design approach to mechanical assemblies”, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 3–18. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffan, K.-E.W.H., Fett, M. and Kirchner, E. (2022), “Function Integration through Design for Hybrid Integrating Additive Manufacturing Technologies”, 17th International Design Conference, Online, 23–26 May 2022, Cambridge University Press, University of Cambridge, pp. 1471–1480. http://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valjak, F., Kosorčić, D., Rešetar, M. and Bojčetić, N. (2022), “Function-Based Design Principles for Additive Manufacturing”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 12 No. 7, Article 3300. http://doi.org/10.3390/app12073300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, C. (2018), Funktionsintegration im Rahmen einer fertigungsgetriebenen Produktentwicklung, Thesis (Dr.-Ing.), Technical University of Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Wohlers, T. and Gomet, T. (2015), Wohlers Report 2015: History of Additive Manufacturing, Wohlers Associates, Belgium.Google Scholar
Yang, S. and Zhao, Y.F. (2015), “Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 327–342. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S. and Zhao, Y.F. (2018), “Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Part Count Reduction: A Lifecycle Perspective”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140 No. 3. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Santoro, F. and Zhao, Y.F. (2018), “Towards a Numerical Approach of Finding Candidates for Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Part Consolidation”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140 No. 4, Article 41701. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Santoro, F., Sulthan, M.A. and Zhao, Y.F. (2019), “A numerical-based part consolidation candidate detection approach with modularization considerations”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 30, pp. 63–83. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0298-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Talekar, T., Sulthan, M.A. and Zhao, Y.F. (2017), “A Generic Sustainability Assessment Model towards Consolidated Parts Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing Process”, 45th SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference, Los Angeles, California, USA, 4–8 June 2017, Elsevier B.V., pp. 831–844. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Tang, Y. and Zhao, Y.F. (2015), “A new part consolidation method to embrace the design freedom of additive manufacturing”, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 20, pp. 444–449. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziebart, J.R. (2012), Ein konstruktionsmethodischer Ansatz zur Funktionsintegration, Thesis (Dr.-Ing.), Technical University Braunschweig.Google Scholar