Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:58:02.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IMPROVING DECISION MAKING IN PRODUCT MODULARIZATION BY GAME-BASED MANAGEMENT TRAINING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Magnus Persson*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
Juliana Hsuan
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School;
Poul Kvysgaard Hansen
Affiliation:
Aalborg University
*
Persson, Magnus, Chalmers University of Technology, Technology Management and Economics, Sweden, magper@chalmers.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To deal with the complexity caused by a constantly increasing need for product customization many companies have adopted a product modularization strategy. Product modularization has the potential to give benefits both in the design of products, in manufacturing as well as in the supply chain. But, it poses great challenges in its implementation, which includes complex decision-making that will affect the whole value-chain. The purpose of this paper is to describe how a game-based approach can be used for academic education, and management training, with the aim of improving decision-making in product modularization. This by visualizing, and practice, the complex interplay between product, manufacturing and supply chain architecture. The paper describes the development of the LEGO Exploratorium game set up, based on the LEGO minifigures, and how it has been used for both teaching engineering students and in company workshop. Using this game set up will increase companies' possibilities to develop modularized products that are designed for both efficient manufacturing and supply chain management.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Andersen, E. and Schiano, B. (2014). Teaching with Cases. Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B. (1997), “Managing in an age of modularity”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75 No. 5, pp. 8493.Google Scholar
Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B., 2000. Design Rules. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brax, S.A., Bask, A., Hsuan, J. and Voss, C. (2017), “Service modularity and architecture: an overview and research agenda”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 686702. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2017-0191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K.J. and Rhenman, E. (1961). “The role of management games in education and research”, Management Science”, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 131166.10.1287/mnsc.7.2.131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, N., Poulsen, C. and Stylios, C. (2015), Case Based Teaching and Learning for the 21st Century. Libri Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
de Blok, C., Meijboom, B., Luijkx, K., Schols, J. and Schroeder, R. (2014), “Interfaces in service modularity: a typology developed in modular health care provision”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 32, pp. 175189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, A., Browning, T. R. and Reich, Y. (2017). “Designing products for adaptability: insights from four industrial cases”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 875917. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, M., Ramdas, K. and Ulrich, K. (1999), “Component sharing in the management of product variety: a study of automotive braking systems”, Management Science, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 297315. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.3.297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, L. and Sorenson, O. (2001), “The Dangers of Modularity”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, No. 8, pp. 2021.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. and Golenhofen, F. (2019). Mastering Disruption and Innovation in Product Management. Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-93512-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershenson, J.K., Prasad, G.J. and Zhang, Y. (2003), “Product modularity: Definitions and benefits”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 295313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954482031000091068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P.K. and Persson, M. (2016), “Engineering Case Method Applied in Teaching Modularization Management”, DS 85-2: Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, Volume 2, Trondheim, Norway, 10th - 12th August 2016, Boks, C., Sigurjonsson, J., Steinert, M., Vis, C., and Wulvik, A. (Eds.), Educational Perspectives.Google Scholar
Hansen, P.K., Oliveira, M. and Costa, J. (2016), “Co-design of a game to support increased manufacturing insight and interest among teenagers and young adults”, Games and Learning Alliance: 4th International Conference, GALA 2015, Rome, Italy, December 9-11, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. Gloria, A. D. & Veltkamp, R. (red.), Springer, pp. 421430.10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1_47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoetker, G. (2006), “Do modular products lead to modular organizations?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 501518. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, M., Vickery, S.K. and Droge, C. (2007), “The effects of product modularity on competitive performance. Do integration strategies mediate the relationship?International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 27 No. 10, pp. 10461068. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710820620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, M., Droge, C., Vickery, S.K. and Calantone, R. (2011), “Product and process modularity's effects on manufacturing agility and firm growth performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 123137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00785.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, A. and Tollenaere, M. (2005) “Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 16, pp. 371390.10.1007/s10845-005-7030-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, A.K.W., Yam, R.C.M. and Tang, E.P.Y. (2007), “Supply chain product co-development, product modularity and product performance. Empirical evidence from Hong Kong manufacturers”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 107 No. 7, pp. 10361065. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710816739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, M. and Pasche, M. (2014), “A contingency-based approach to the use of product platforms and modules in new product development”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 434450. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12106|CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, T. and Lakemond, N. (2017), “Evolving schemes of interpretation: Investigating the dual role of architectures in new product development”, R&D Management, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 3646. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12142|Google Scholar
Project, ManuSkills EU (2014), Envisioning an advanced ICT-supported build-up of manufacturing skills for the Factories of the Future, FoF-ICT-2013.7.2, Grant agreement no. 609147.Google Scholar
Marion, T.J., Meyer, M.H. and Barczak, G. (2015), “The influence of digital design and IT on modular product architecture”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 98110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12240|CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, J.H. (2003), “Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter-firm learning”, R&D Management, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 439454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00309Google Scholar
Mikkola, J.H. (2006), “Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 128146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, J.H. (2007), “Management of product architecture modularity for mass customization: Modeling and theoretical considerations”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54 No.1, pp. 5769. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.889067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, J.H. and Skjøtt-Larsen, T. (2004), “Supply Chain integration: Implications for mass customization, modularization and postponement strategies”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 352361. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953728042000238845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muffatto, M. (1999), “Platform strategies in international new product development”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 1 No.5/6, pp. 449459. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910260766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, S.L., Pan, G., Chen, A.J.W. and Hsieh, M.H. (2007), “The dynamics of implementing and managing modularity of organizational routines during capability development: Insights from a process model”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 800813. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.906854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, M. and Åhlström, P. (2006), “Managerial issues in modularising complex products”, Technovation, Vol. 26 No. 11, pp. 12011209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, M. and Åhlström, P. (2013), “Product Modularization and Organizational Coordination”, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 5574.10.1504/IJATM.2013.052779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piran, F.A.S., Lacerda, D.P., Camargo, L.F.R., Viero, C.F., Dresch, A. and Cauchick-Miguel, P.A. (2016), “Product modularization and effects on efficiency: An analysis of a bus manufacturer using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 182, pp. 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahaym, A., Steensma, H.K. and Schilling, M.A. (2007), “The influence of information technology on the use of loosely coupled organizational forms: An industry-level analysis”, Organization Science, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 865880. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, R. (2000), “Product and process architectures in the management of knowledge”, in Robertson, Foss (Eds.), Resources, Technology and Strategy. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Sanchez, R. and Mahoney, J.T. (1996), “Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 6376. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrage, M. (2000), Serious Play – How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Schilling, M.A. (2000), “Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 312334. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3312918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seliger, G. and Zettl, M. (2008). “Modularization as an enabler for cycle economy”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 57, pp. 133136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1962), “The Architecture of Complexity”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 106 No. 6, pp. 467482.Google Scholar
Snowden, D.J. and Boone, M. (2007), “A Leader's Framework for Decision Making”, Harvard Business Review, November, pp. 6876.Google Scholar
Voss, C.A. and Hsuan, J. (2009), “Service architecture and modularity”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 541569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00241.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M., Guo, H., Huo, B., Zhao, X. and Huang, J. (2019), “Linking supply chain quality integration with mass customization and product modularity”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 207 pp. 227235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyda, M. (2005), “From visual simulation to virtual reality to games”, Computer, Vol. 38 No. 9, pp. 2532. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2005.297CrossRefGoogle Scholar