Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:20:52.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Inclusive Design Canvas. A Strategic Design Template for Architectural Design Professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

M. Zallio  and
P. J. Clarkson
M. Zallio*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
P. J. Clarkson
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
*
mz461@cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Designing accessible and inclusive buildings is essential if they are to provide enjoyable and inspiring experiences for all their occupants. Research revealed that many architectural design professionals perceive a lack of awareness of the aspects to consider when designing to be a limiting factor in the uptake of Inclusive Design. By involving expert stakeholders this study provides evidence for the demand to create an Inclusive Design Canvas, a strategic design template offering an educational springboard for building industry professionals to embed Inclusive Design in the design process.

Keywords

inclusive designdesign toolsarchitectural designaccessibilitycollaborative design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 81 - 90
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Altomonte, S., Allen, J., Bluyssen, P.M., Brager, G., Heschong, L. et al. . (2020). “Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment”, Building and Environment, Vol. 180 No. 106949. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2016). “(Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts' (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 739–743. 10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BSI (2021), PAS 6463: Design for the mind - Neurodiversity and the built environment - Guide. Available at: https://standardsdevelopment.bsigroup.com/projects/2020-00234#/(accessed 11.11.2021).Google Scholar
BSRIA (2015), Soft Landings Set of 5 Guides (SL5). Available at: https://www.bsria.com/uk/product/Krq5er/soft_landings_set_of_5_guides_sl5_a15d25e1/(accessed 11.11.2021).Google Scholar
Chasanidou, D., Gasparini, A. A. and Lee, E. (2015). “Design Thinking Methods and Tools for Innovation”, In: Marcus, A. (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Discourse. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham, Vol. 9186, pp. 12–23. 10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Hosking, I. and Waller, S. (2007). Inclusive Design Toolkit. Engineering Design Centre, University Of Cambridge. https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/downloads/idtoolkit.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. (1999). The Inmates are Running the Asylum. Sams Publishing, Indianapolis, Indiana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, C., Zallio, M., Berry, D. and McGrory, J. (2021). “Towards a people-first engineering design approach. A comprehensive ontology for designing inclusive environments”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden. 10.1017/pds.2021.579Google Scholar
Franke, N. and Piller, F. (2004). “Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 401–415. 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00094.xGoogle Scholar
Gallanis, T. (2020). “An Introduction to Design Thinking and an Application to the Challenges of Frail, Older Adults”, In: Celi, L., Majumder, M., Ordóñez, P., Osorio, J., Paik, K. et al. (Eds.) Leveraging Data Science for Global Health. Springer, Cham, pp. 17–33. 10.1007/978-3-030-47994-7_2Google Scholar
Goodman-Deane, J. A.-L., Bradley, M., Waller, S. and Clarkson, P.J. (2021). Developing personas to help designers to understand digital exclusion. Proceedings of the Design Society. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1203–1212. 10.1017/pds.2021.120Google Scholar
Green, A. (1990). “What do we mean by user needs”, British Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 65–78.Google Scholar
Heylighen, A. and Dong, A. (2019). “To empathise or not to empathise? Empathy and its limits in design”, Design Studies, Vol. 65, pp. 107–124. 10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heylighen, A., Van der Linden, V. and Van Steenwinkel, I. (2017). “Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment”, Building and Environment, Vol. 114, pp. 507–517. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO (2019), ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html (accessed 11.11.2021).Google Scholar
Mitchell, V., Ross, T., May, A., Sims, R. and Parker, C. (2016). “Empirical investigation of the impact of using co-design methods when generating proposals for sustainable travel solutions”, CoDesign, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 205–220. 10.1080/15710882.2015.1091894Google Scholar
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010), Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Persad, U., Langdon, P.M. and Clarkson, P.J. (2007). “A framework for analytical inclusive design evaluation”, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED07), Paris, France, August 28-31, 2007, pp. 817–818.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T.J. and Olson, J.C. (2001). Understanding Consumer Decision Making: The Means-end Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy (1st ed.). Psychology Press, New York. 10.4324/9781410600844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, E.K. (2009). “Chapter 11 - Outcome measurement”, In: Lennon, S. and Stokes, M. (Eds.), Pocketbook of Neurological Physiotherapy, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp. 191–201. 10.1016/B978-044306854-6.50016-4Google Scholar
Tan, T.Q. (2019). “Principles of Inclusion, Diversity, Access, and Equity”, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 220 Issue Supplement_2, pp. S30–S32. 10.1093/infdis/jiz198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usable Buildings Trust. (2017). BUS Methodology. Available at: https://busmethodology.org.uk/ (accessed 15.06.2021).Google Scholar
WHO (2002). Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zallio, M., Berry, D. and Casiddu, N. (2016). “Adaptive homes for enabling senior citizens: A holistic assessment tool for housing design and IoT-based technologies”, Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd World Forum of Internet of Things (Wf- IoT), Reston, Vancouver, December 12-14, 2016, pp. 419–424, 10.1109/WF-IoT.2016.7845463Google Scholar
Zallio, M. and Clarkson, P.J. (2021a). “Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice”, Building and Environment, Vol. 206 No. 108352. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zallio, M. and Clarkson, P. J. (2021b). “On Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility in civil engineering and architectural design. A review of assessment tools”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden. 10.1017/pds.2021.491Google Scholar