Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:30:22.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introducing Agility into the Processes of Manufacturing Companies: A Method for Evaluating Success, Support and Applicability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

J. Heimicke ,
C. Czech ,
M. Schoeck ,
J. Mueller ,
S. Rapp  and
A. Albers
J. Heimicke
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
C. Czech
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
M. Schoeck
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
J. Mueller
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
S. Rapp
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
A. Albers*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
sekretariat@ipek.kit.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Agile approaches are increasingly being used in appropriate use cases for the development of mechatronic systems.In the process of implementing agile elements in the development processes, the question of the success of the transformation often arises. In order to support the agile transition in measuring process improvement, a framework was developed that evaluates the success of the implementation process by means of interviews at 4 maturity levels in the transformation. The method was evaluated in 3 use cases. On this basis, continuous adaptations can be made to the implementation process.

Keywords

agile developmentagilityevaluationagile systems designadvanced systems engineering
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 2463 - 2472
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Albers, A., Reiß, N., Bursac, N. and Richter, T. (2016), “iPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 100–105. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.168Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Spadinger, M., Reiss, N., Breitschuh, J., Richter, T., Bursac, N. and Marthaler, F. (2019), “A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD - Agile Systems Design”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp. 1015–1022. 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J. and Trost, S. (2020a), “Effects and Interactions of agile Principles in the Process of Mechatronic System Development: Building a basic Un- derstanding for adaptive Process Design”, in Balancing Innovation and operation, 12th - 14th August 2020, The Design Society. 10.35199/NORDDESIGN2020.22Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Trost, S. and Spadinger, M. (2020b), “Alignment of the change to agile through method-supported evaluation of agile principles in physical product development”, in Procedia 30th CIRP Design Conference, Vol. 91, pp. 600–614. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.218Google Scholar
Albers, A., Mandel, C., Yan, S. and Behrendt, M. (2018), “System of Systems Approach for the Description and Characterization of Validation Environments”, in Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. The Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 2799–2810. 10.21278/idc.2018.0460Google Scholar
Atzberger, A., Nicklas, S.J., Schrof, J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2020), Agile development of physical products: A study of the current state in industrial practice.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer, London. 10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1Google Scholar
Boehm, B. and Turner, R. (2005), “Management Challenges to Implementing Agile Processes in Traditional Development Organizations”, IEEE Software, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 30–39. 10.1109/MS.2005.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M. and Lassenius, C. (2016), “Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 119, pp. 87–108. 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumitrescu, R., Albers, A., Riedel, O., Stark, R. and Gausemeier, J. (2021), Engineering in Germany - Status quo in business and science: A contribution to advanced systems engineering, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J. and Stacey, M.K.. (2003), “The Spiral of Applied Research: A Methodological View on Integrated Design Research”, 19-21 August, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Meißner, M. and Paetzold, K. (2013), “Understanding the context of product development”, in Lindemann, U., Venkataraman, S., Kim, Y.S. and Lee, S.W. (Eds.), Proceedings of ICED 13, pp. 191–200.Google Scholar
Gloger, B. (2017), “Inseparable in the future: Agile product development and design thinking”, in Jochmann, W., Böckenholt, I. and Diestel, S. (Eds.), HR-Exzellenz, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 151–164. 10.1007/978-3-658-14725-9_9Google Scholar
Goevert, K., Heimicke, J., Lindemann, U. and Albers, A. (2019a), “Interview Study on the Agile Development of Mechatronic Systems”, in The Design Society (Ed.), Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, pp. 2287–2296. 10.1017/dsi.2019.235Google Scholar
Goevert, Kristin; Brombeiss, Maximilian; Lindemann, Udo (2019b): Integration of Mechatronic Product Development Methods in an Agile Development Area. In: Chakrabarti, Amaresh (Hg.): Research into Design for a Connected World. Proceedings of ICoRD 2019 Volume 2, Bd. 135. Singapore: Springer Singapore (SpringerLink Bücher, 135), S. 119–131. 10.1007/978-981-13-5977-4_10Google Scholar
Gregory, P., Barroca, L., Taylor, K., Salah, D. and Sharp, H. (2015), “Agile Challenges in Practice: A Thematic Analysis”, in Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T. and Paasivaara, M. (Eds.), Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, Vol. 212, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 64–80. 10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_6Google Scholar
Heimicke, J., Duehr, K., Krüger, M., Ng, G.-L. and Albers, A. (2021a), “A framework for generating agile methods for product development”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 100, pp. 786–791. 10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.043Google Scholar
Heimicke, J., Kaiser, S. and Albers, A. (2021b), “Agile product development: an analysis of acceptance and added value in practice”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 100, pp. 768–773. 10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimicke, J., Ng, G.-L., Krüger, M. and Albers, A. (2021c), “A systematic for realizing agile principles in the process of mechatronic systems development through individual selection of suitable process models, methods and practices”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 100, pp. 619–624. 10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.133Google Scholar
Heimicke, J., Niever, M., Zimmermann, V., Klippert, M., Marthaler, F. and Albers, A. (2019), “Comparison of Existing Agile Approaches in the Context of Mechatronic System Development: Potentials and Limits in Implementation”, Proceedings of ICED19, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2199–2208. 10.1017/dsi.2019.226Google Scholar
Keating, C., Rogers, R., Unal, R., Dryer, D., Sousa-Poza, A., Safford, R., Peterson, W. and Rabadi, G. (2003), “System of systems engineering”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 36–45. 10.1080/10429247.2003.11415214Google Scholar
Kindermann, A. (2018), “Thermomix: A kitchen classic goes digital”, in Gärtner, C. and Heinrich, C. (Eds.), Case Studies on Digital Transformation, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 107–128. 10.1007/978-3-658-18745-3_6Google Scholar
Marxen, L. (2014), A Framework for Design Support Development based on the integrated Product Engineering Model iPeM, Dissertation, IPEK-Forschungsberichte, Vol. 74, IPEK - Institute for Product Development at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N. (2012), “The Challenges of becomming agile: IMPLMENTING AND CONDUCTING SCRUM IN INTEGRATED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT.”, PhD Thesis, Department of Architecture, Designing& Media Technology, Aalborg University, 2012.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K., Emblemsvåg, J., Bailey, R., Allen, J. and Mistree, F.. (2000), “The''Validation Square''-Validating Design Methods”, ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Chahin, A., Kößler, J. and Paetzold, K. (2017), “Agile development and the constraints of physicality: A network theory-based cause-and-effect analysis”, ICED17.Google Scholar
Schuh, G., Dolle, C., Diels, F. and Kuhn, M. (2018), “Methodology for Determining Agile Product Scopes in Development Projects”, in 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Honolulu, HI, IEEE, pp. 1–9. 10.23919/PICMET.2018.8481926Google Scholar
Schuh, G., Rudolf, S., Riesener, M. and Kantelberg, J. (2016), “Application of highly-iterative product development in automotive and manufacturing industry”, in The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) (Ed.), ISPIM Innovation Symposium.Google Scholar
Schwaber, K. and Sutherland, J. (2020), “The Scrum Guide. The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game”.Google Scholar
Stage-Gate International (2019), “The Official Site of Stage-Gate®,” available at: https://www.stage-gate.com/.Google Scholar