Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:17:42.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: INSIGHTS FROM A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Sachira Vilochani*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
Tim C. McAloone
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
Daniela C. A. Pigosso
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
*
Paththah Mesthrige, Sachira Vilochani, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, sacvi@dtu.dk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sustainable Product Development (SPD) has been gaining increased attention in academia, industry, and policy. Over the past three decades, significant progress has been observed in incorporation of environmental issues into the product development process, through the so-called ecodesign management practices. Nevertheless, systematisation of the SPD practices, which simultaneously consider the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainability, is still missing. To address this gap, this research aims to identify the existing SPD management practices in the academic literature, with special focus on how sustainability dimensions are currently being considered, their coverage in relation to key knowledge areas for product development and their applicability across the SPD phases. Through a systematic literature review, 362 practices were identified and further classified according to a classification criteria. While environmental considerations are still the most prominent ones, the research highlights the importance of the early stages of product development for SPD, as well as the key knowledge areas which are currently being covered by the practices, such as sustainability evaluation and sustainability improvement.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Australian National Audit Office. (2009), Innovation in the Public Sector: Enabling Better Performance, Driving New Directions: Better Practice Guide., Australian National Audit Office.Google Scholar
Biolchini, J., Gomes Mian, P., Candida Cruz Natali, A. and Horta Travassos, G. (2005), Systematic Review in Software Engineering.Google Scholar
Brones, F. and Monteiro De Carvalho, M. (2015), “From 50 to 1: Integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 96, pp. 4457, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G., Kosoris, J., Hong, L.N. and Crul, M. (2009), “Design for sustainability: Current trends in sustainable product design and development”, Sustainability, MDPI, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 409424, https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su1030409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahmani, N., Benhida, K., Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Elfezazi, S. and Jauhar, S.K. (2021), “Smart circular product design strategies towards eco-effective production systems: A lean eco-design industry 4.0 framework”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 320, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekoninck, E.A., Domingo, L., O'Hare, J.A., Pigosso, D.C.A., Reyes, T. and Troussier, N. (2016), “Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: Development and consolidation of a framework”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 135, pp. 410425, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz Tena, A., Schoeggl, J.P., Reyes, T. and Baumgartner, R.J. (2021), “Exploring sustainable product development processes for a circular economy through morphological analysis”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 14911499, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostatni, E. (2018), “Recycling-oriented eco-design methodology based on decentralised artificial intelligence”, Management and Production Engineering Review, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 7989, https://dx.doi.org/10.24425/119537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Union, European. (n.d.). “Summaries of EU legislation”.Google Scholar
Hutchins, M.J. and Sutherland, J.W. (2008), “An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16 No. 15, pp. 16881698, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S.N., Chen, C., Chen, Y., Lee, H.S. and Shen, P. di. (2013), “Sustainable design performance evaluation with applications in the automobile industry: Focusing on inefficiency by undesirable factors”, Omega (United Kingdom), Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 553558, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO/TR 14062:2002(E) Environmental management — Integrating environmental aspects into product design and development”.Google Scholar
Johansson, G. (2002), “Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development”, Environmental Management and Health, Emerald, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 98107, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09566160210417868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzardo, A., Marson, A., Zuliani, F., Bacenetti, J. and Scipioni, A. (2021), “Combination of product environmental footprint method and eco-design process according to ISO 14006: The case of an Italian vinery”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 799, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margallo, M., Ruiz-Salmón, I., Laso, J., Bala, A., Colomé, R., Gazulla, C., Fullana-i-Palmer, P., et al. (2021), “Combining technical, environmental, social and economic aspects in a life-cycle ecodesign methodology: An integrated approach for an electronic toy”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 278, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAloone, Tim., Bey, Niki., Danmark, Miljøstyrelsen and Ulla, Ringbæk. (2009), Environmental Improvement through Product Development: A Guide, [Environmental Protection Agency].Google Scholar
Mendoza, J.M.F., Sharmina, M., Gallego-Schmid, A., Heyes, G. and Azapagic, A. (2017), “Integrating Backcasting and Eco-Design for the Circular Economy: The BECE Framework”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 526544, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2007), Engineering Design A Systematic Approach, 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag London Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A. and McAloone, T.C. (2015), “Ecodesign maturity model as a framework to support the transition towards iso 14.001:2015 certification”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 1, pp. 8796.Google Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A., Mcaloone, T.C. and Rozenfeld, H. (2014), “Systematization of best practices for ecodesign implementation”, International Design Conference-Design 2014.Google Scholar
Pigosso, D.C.A., Rozenfeld, H. and McAloone, T.C. (2013), “Ecodesign maturity model: A management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 59, pp. 160173, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, V.P., Pigosso, D.C.A., Andersen, J.W. and McAloone, T.C. (2018), “Evaluating the potential business benefits of ecodesign implementation: A logic model approach”, Sustainability (Switzerland), MDPI, Vol. 10 No. 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10062011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, V.P., Pigosso, D.C.A. and McAloone, T.C. (2017), “Measuring the implementation of ecodesign management practices: A review and consolidation of process-oriented performance indicators”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 156, pp. 293309, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B. and Nijkamp, P. (2015), “A systemic framework for sustainability assessment”, Ecological Economics, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 119, pp. 314325, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, J. and Hallstedt, S.I. (2018), “Workshop method for early sustainable product development”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. 6, pp. 27512762, https://dx.doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, J. and Knuts, S. (2022), “Sustainability impact and effects analysis - A risk management tool for sustainable product development”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 30, pp. 737751, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, L. and Rahimifard, S. (2013), “Evolution in Ecodesign and Sustainable Design Methodologies”, 20th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, pp. 3540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villamil, C., Schulte, J. and Hallstedt, S. (2021), “Sustainability risk and portfolio management—A strategic scenario method for sustainable product development”, Business Strategy and the Environment, https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watz, M. and Hallstedt, S.I. (2022), “Towards sustainable product development – Insights from testing and evaluating a profile model for management of sustainability integration into design requirements”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 346, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131000.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Zhang, L., Fung, K.Y., Bakshi, B.R. and Ng, K.M. (2020), “Sustainable product design: A life-cycle approach”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 217, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, J., Tian, J., Gao, D. and Zhang, X. (2019), “Guideline for green design of commercial refrigerating appliances”, E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 118, EDP Sciences, https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911802002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar