Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:12:52.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MBSE INCORPORATING TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR FOR THE DESIGN OF ROBOT-LIKE SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Klara Ziegler ,
Marcus Volpert ,
Maximilian Amm ,
Birgit Vogel-Heuser ,
Karsten Stahl  and
Markus Zimmermann
Klara Ziegler*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
Marcus Volpert
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
Maximilian Amm
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
Birgit Vogel-Heuser
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
Karsten Stahl
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
Markus Zimmermann
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
*
Ziegler, Klara, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Germany, klara.ziegler@tum.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Complex systems typically consist of many components and are subject to many requirements. Approaches like the V-Model support complex systems design by providing guidelines on how to break down large systems into smaller pieces. Models built with SysML provide documentation on an abstract level. However, neither incoporates detailed information on components that may be relevant for design decisions. In robot-like systems, e.g., the choice of transmissions will depend on the system dynamics of the robot. This is modeled in the time domain, where detailed time-dependent component interaction is considered. The design perspective, however, is best represented in the property domain. Here, requirements on static component properties are formulated.

This paper presents a generic approach that connects the property and time domains to enable early-stage design decisions. The approach is applied to a 1-link robot system with a simple demonstrator transmission model, including properties that are typically not considered in the early design phase, like a nonlinear stiffness characteristic with backlash.

Keywords

Systems Engineering (SE)Product modelling / modelsSimulationMechatronicsmulti-disciplinary design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2585 - 2594
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

ABB (2021), IRB 910SC.Google Scholar
Barbieri, G., Kernschmidt, K., Fantuzzi, C. and Vogel-Heuser, B. (2014), “A SysML based design pattern for the high-level development of mechatronic systems to enhance re-usability,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 3431–3437. http://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) (2007), “SYSTEMS ENGINEERING VISION 2020”. Technical paper no. INCOSETP-2004-004-02, 2007.Google Scholar
Kernschmidt, K., Feldmann, S. and Vogel-Heuser, B. (2018), “A model-based framework for increasing the interdisciplinary design of mechatronic production systems”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 11, pp. 617–643. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1520205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mareczek, J. (2020), Grundlagen der Roboter-Manipulatoren – Band 1, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, A.-D. and Ahn, H.-J. (2018), “High Precision Reducers for Industrial Robots Driving 4th Industrial Revolution: State of Arts, Analysis, Design, Performance Evaluation and Perspective”, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 519–533. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0058-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rösch, S., Schutz, D., Bayrak, G. and Vogel-Heuser, B. (2012), “Supporting integrated development of closed-loop PLC control software for production systems”, IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 25.10.2012 - 28.10.2012, Montreal, QC, Canada, IEEE, pp. 6185–6190. http://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2012.6389069Google Scholar
Rosenbauer, T. (1995), Getriebe für Industrieroboter: Beurteilungskriterien, Kenndaten, Einsatzhinweise, Zugl.: Aachen, Univ., Diss., 1994, Berichte aus der Produktionstechnik, Vol. 94, 32, Als Ms. gedr, Shaker, Aachen.Google Scholar
Rötzer, S., Rostan, N., Steger, H.C., Vogel-Heuser, B. and Zimmermann, M. (2020), “Sequencing of Information in Modular Model-based Systems Design”, in DS 103: Proceedings of the 22nd International DSM Conference (DSM 2020), MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, October 13th - 15th, 2020, The Design Society, p. 10. http://doi.org/10.35199/dsm2020.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rötzer, S., Schweigert-Recksiek, S., Thoma, D. and Zimmermann, M. (2022), “Attribute dependency graphs: modelling cause and effect in systems design”, Design Science, Vol. 8. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The MathWorks, Inc., “Robot Dynamics”, available at: https://de.mathworks.com/help/robotics/ug/robot-dynamics.html (accessed 29 November 2022).Google Scholar
The MathWorks, Inc., “Simulink. gemacht für Model-Based Design”, available at: https://de.mathworks.com/products/simulink.html (accessed 29 November 2022).Google Scholar
The Object Management Group, “WHAT IS SYSML?”, available at: http://www.omgsysml.org/what-is-sysml.htm (accessed 29 November 2022).Google Scholar
VDI (2021), Development of mechatronic and cyber-physical systems No. VDI/VDE 2206.Google Scholar
Vogel-Heuser, B., Zimmermann, M., Stahl, K., Land, K., Ocker, F., Rötzer, S., Landler, S. and Otto, M. (2020), “Current Challenges in the Design of Drives for Robot-Like Systems”, in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 11.10.2020 - 14.10.2020, Toronto, ON, Canada, IEEE, pp. 1923–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolny, S., Mazak, A., Carpella, C., Geist, V. and Wimmer, M. (2020), “Thirteen years of SysML: a systematic mapping study”, Software and Systems Modeling, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 111–169. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-019-00735-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerwas, T., Jacobs, G., Kowalski, J., Husung, S., Gerhard, D., Rumpe, B., Zeman, K., Vafaei, S., König, F. and Höpfner, G. (2022), “Model Signatures for the Integration of Simulation Models into System Models”, Systems, Vol. 10 No. 6, p. 199. http://doi.org/10.3390/systems10060199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, M. and Hoessle, J.E. von (2013), “Computing solution spaces for robust design”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 94 No. 3, pp. 290–307. http://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, M., Königs, S., Niemeyer, C., Fender, J., Zeherbauer, C., Vitale, R. and Wahle, M. (2017), “On the design of large systems subject to uncertainty”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 233–254. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2017.1303664CrossRefGoogle Scholar