Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:55:11.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MODEL-BASED DESIGN OF AM COMPONENTS TO ENABLE DECENTRALIZED DIGITAL MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Olivia Borgue ,
John Stavridis ,
Tomas Vannucci ,
Panagiotis Stavropoulos ,
Harry Bikas ,
Rosa Di Falco  and
Lars Nyborg
Olivia Borgue*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
John Stavridis
Affiliation:
Prima Industries SpA; Politecnico di Torino;
Tomas Vannucci
Affiliation:
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden;
Panagiotis Stavropoulos
Affiliation:
University of Patras
Harry Bikas
Affiliation:
University of Patras
Rosa Di Falco
Affiliation:
Prima Industries SpA; Politecnico di Torino;
Lars Nyborg
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
*
Borgue, Olivia, Chalmers University of Technology, Industrial and Material Sciences, Sweden, borgue@chalmers.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a versatile technology that could add flexibility in manufacturing processes, whether implemented alone or along other technologies. This technology enables on-demand production and decentralized production networks, as production facilities can be located around the world to manufacture products closer to the final consumer (decentralized manufacturing). However, the wide adoption of additive manufacturing technologies is hindered by the lack of experience on its implementation, the lack of repeatability among different manufacturers and a lack of integrated production systems. The later, hinders the traceability and quality assurance of printed components and limits the understanding and data generation of the AM processes and parameters. In this article, a design strategy is proposed to integrate the different phases of the development process into a model-based design platform for decentralized manufacturing. This platform is aimed at facilitating data traceability and product repeatability among different AM machines. The strategy is illustrated with a case study where a car steering knuckle is manufactured in three different facilities in Sweden and Italy.

Keywords

Additive ManufacturingSystems Engineering (SE)3D printing
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2127 - 2136
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Berthold, M. R., and Hall, L. O. (2003) “Visualizing fuzzy points in parallel coordinates,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 11(3), pp. 369–374, https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2003.812696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogers, M., Hadar, R., Bilberg, A.. (2016) Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 102 225–239.10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham, E., McMaster, K., Thomson, E., Panarotto, M., Müller, J. R., Isaksson, O., & Johansson, E. (2020). Designing and Integrating a Digital Thread System for Customized Additive Manufacturing in Multi-Partner Kayak Production. Systems, 8(4), 43.10.3390/systems8040043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnard, R., Hascoët, J. Y., Mognol, P., & Stroud, I. (2018). STEP-NC digital thread for additive manufacturing: data model, implementation and validation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(11), 1141–1160.10.1080/0951192X.2018.1509130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgue, O., Müller, J., Leicht, A., Panarotto, M., & Isaksson, O. (2019). Constraint Replacement-Based Design for Additive Manufacturing of Satellite Components: Ensuring Design Manufacturability through Tailored Test Artefacts. Aerospace, 6(11), 124.10.3390/aerospace6110124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brice, C. A. (2011). Unintended consequences: How qualification constrains innovation. In Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (p. 241). John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118147726.ch34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claesson, A. A Configurable Component Framework Supporting Platform-Based Product Development. Ph.D. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2006.Google Scholar
Diegel, O., Nordin, A. and Motte, D. (2019), A Practical Guide to Design for Additive Manufacturing, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8281-9 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbart, B.; Gericke, K.; Blessing, L.T. (2007) Taking a look at the utilisation of function models in interdisciplinary design: Insights from ten engineering companies. Res. Eng. Des. 28, 299–331.10.1007/s00163-016-0242-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J.; Stringer, J.; Xu, X.; Zhong, R.Y. Investigation of printable threshold overhang angle in extrusion-based additive manufacturing for reducing support waste. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2018, 31, 961–969, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1466398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, İ., Çolak, M., & Terzi, F. (2019). A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 207–228.10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C.; Le Roux, L.; Körner, C.; Tabaste, O.; Lacan, F.; Bigot, S. (2020) Digital Twin-enabled Collaborative Data Management for Metal Additive Manufacturing Systems. J. Manuf. Syst. S0278612520300741.10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, D., Marsden, W., & Warde, S. (2016). Overview of additive manufacturing informatics: “a digital thread”. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 5(1), 114–142Google Scholar
Müller, J. R., Siiskonen, M. D. I., & Malmqvist, J. (2020). Lessons learned from the application of enhanced function-means modelling. In Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1325–1334). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naghshineh, B., & Carvalho, H. (2020). The Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Supply Chain Resilience. In Doctoral Conference on Computing, Electrical and Industrial Systems (pp. 214–221). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Rayna, T., Striukova, L. (2016) From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: how 3D printing is changing business model innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 102, 214–22410.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupal, B. S., Ahmad, R., & Qureshi, A. J. (2018). Feature-based methodology for design of geometric benchmark test artifacts for additive manufacturing processes. Procedia Cirp, 70, 84–89.10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, J., & Collan, M. (2020). How Additive Manufacturing Technology Changes Business Models?–Review of Literature. Additive Manufacturing, 32, 101070.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101070CrossRefGoogle Scholar