Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:22:12.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Holistic Approach Towards a Technology-Driven Development-Model in Automotive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

F. Reichelt ,
D. Blank ,
D. Holder  and
T. Maier
F. Reichelt*
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany
D. Blank
Affiliation:
Scania CV AB, Sweden
D. Holder
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany
T. Maier
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany
*
florian.reichelt@iktd.uni-stuttgart.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The use of agile methods can also be advantageous in the development of physical products, as pilot projects have shown so far. However, the transfer of agile methods to the entire organisation is difficult, due to the different, prevailing circumstances of the various development activities. We have therefore defined a new approach subdividing product development into agile technology-driven and traditional product-oriented development. This model considers the methodological characteristics and thus enables the combination of the benefits of both agile and traditional development methods..

Keywords

design processautomotive processagile developmenthybrid developmentdesign methodology
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 241 - 252
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Albers, A., Rapp, S., Birk, C. and Bursac, N. (2017), “Die Frühe Phase der PGE – Produktgenerations-entwicklung”, in Binz, H., Bertsche, B., Bauer, W., Spath, D. and Roth, D. (Eds.), Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2017 Stuttgart, 29. June 2017, Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Spadinger, M., Reiss, N., Breitschuh, J., Richter, T., Bursac, N. and Marthaler, F. (2019a), “A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD - Agile Systems Design”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp. 1015–1022. 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.312.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Hirschter, T., Fahl, J., Reinemann, J., Spadinger, M., Hünemeyer, S. and Heimicke, J. (2019b), Identification of Indicators for the Selection of Agile, Sequential and Hybrid Approaches in Product Development. Procedia CIRP, 84, pp. 838–847. 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.229.Google Scholar
Atzberger, A., Gerling, C., Schrof, J., Schmidt, T. S., Weiss, S., and Paetzold, K. (2019). Evolution of the hype around agile hardware development. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 1–8). 10.1109/ICE.2019.8792637.Google Scholar
Atzberger, A. and Paetzold, K. (2019), “Current Challenges of Agile Hardware Development: What are Still the Pain Points Nowadays?”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 2019, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2209–2218. 10.1017/dsi.2019.227.Google Scholar
Baschin, J., Schneider, D., Huth, T., & Vietor, T. (2021). Project-oriented Selection of Agile Methods for the Design of Physical Products. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 999–1003). 10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9673047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, N. and Lemoine, G. J. (2014), What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), pp. 311–317. 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, B. and Turner, R. (2005), “Management Challenges to Implementing Agile Processes in Traditional Development Organizations”,IEEE Software, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 30–39. 10.1109/MS.2005.129.Google Scholar
Böhmer, A.I., Beckmann, A. and Lindemann, U. (2015), “Open Innovation Ecosystem - Makerspaces within an Agile Innovation Process”, in Huizingh, E., Conn, S. and Bitran, I. (Eds.), Changing the innovation landscape: ISPIM Innovation Summit Brisbane, Australia, 6–9 December 2015, ISPIM the International Society for Innovation Management, Worsley, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Brandl, F. J., Kagerer, M. and Reinhart, G. (2018). A hybrid innovation management framework for manufacturing–enablers for more agility in plants. Procedia CIRP, 72, pp. 1154–1159. 10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conboy, K. and Carroll, N. (2019), “Implementing Large-Scale Agile Frameworks: Challenges and Recommendations”, IEEE Software, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 44–50. 10.1109/MS.2018.2884865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2007), “Managing Technology Development Projects”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 35 No. 01, pp. 67–76. 10.1080/08956308.2006.11657405.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2014), “What's Next?: After Stage-Gate”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 20–31. 10.5437/08956308X5606963.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Sommer, A.F. (2018), “Agile–Stage-Gate for Manufacturers - Changing the Way New Products Are Developed. Integrating Agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges.”, Research-Technology Management, March 2018., pp. 1–13. 10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380.Google Scholar
Ebert, C. and Paasivaara, M. (2017), “Scaling Agile”, IEEE Software, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 98–103. 10.1109/MS.2017.4121226.Google Scholar
Goll, J. and Hommel, D. (2015): Mit Scrum zum gewünschten System. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg, 10.1007/978-3-658-10721-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusig, L.-O. and Kruse, A. (Eds.) (2010), Fahrzeugentwicklung im Automobilbau: Aktuelle Werkzeuge für den Praxiseinsatz, Hanser Verlag, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heerwagen, M. (2018), “The Changing Face of Development Agile Methods Gain Ground”, ATZ worldwide, Vol. 120 No. 4, pp. 10–15. 10.1007/s38311-018-0045-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimicke, J., Chen, R. and Albers, A. (2020), “AGILE MEETS PLAN-DRIVEN – HYBRID APPROACHES IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW”, Proceedings of the Design 2020:16th International Design Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 577–586. 10.1017/dsd.2020.259.Google Scholar
Komus, A., Kuberg, M., Schmidt, S., Rost, L. and Koch, C.-P. (2020), Studie Status Quo (Scaled) Agile 2019/20, Hochschule Koblenz.Google Scholar
Kuhnert, F., Stürmer, C. and Koster, A. (2017), eascy – Die fünf Dimensionen der Transformation der Automobilindustrie, PricewaterhouseCooper GmbH, Available at: https://www.pwc.de/de%2%20-Fautomobilindustrie%20/pwc_automotive_eascy-studie.pdf (accessed 03.11.2021).Google Scholar
Kuster, J., Huber, E., Lippmann, R., Schmid, A., Schneider, E., Witschi, U. and Wüst, R. (Eds.) (2011), Handbuch Projektmanagement, 3th ed., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-662-57878-0.Google Scholar
Lévárdy, V. (2006), Model-based Framework for the Adaptive Development of Engineering Systems, Dissertation, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 2006.Google Scholar
Project Management Institute. (2017). Agile practice guide. PMI global standard. Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
Reichelt, F., Holder, D., Inkermann, D., Krasteva, P., Maier, T., & Vietor, T. Potentials of an adaptable vehicle gestalt in the interaction of exterior and interior. Binz, H., Bertsche, B., Bauer, W., Spath, D. and Roth, D. (Eds.), Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2019 Stuttgart, 16. May 2019, University of Stuttgart, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Reichelt, F., Holder, D., Kaufmann, A., Maier, T. (2021a) Strategies for User-Centered Adaptation of Future Vehicles. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 221. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_98.Google Scholar
Reichelt, F., Holder, D. and Maier, T. (2021b), “Development of a situational development methodology - a hybrid approach for agile transformation in technical design”, in Binz, H., Bertsche, B., Bauer, W., Spath, D. and Roth, D. (Eds.), Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2021 Stuttgart, 20. May 2021, University of Stuttgart, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Schömann, S.O. (2012), Produktentwicklung in der Automobilindustrie: Managementkonzepte vor dem Hintergrund gewandelter Herausforderungen, Zugl.: Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Univ., Diss., 2011, Gabler Research, 1. ed., Gabler Verlag /Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Wiesbaden. 10.1007/978-3-8349-6673-5.Google Scholar
Schuh, G., Gartzen, T., Soucy-Bouchard, S. and Basse, F. (2017a), “Enabling agility in product development through an adaptive engineering change management.” Procedia CIRP, 63, pp. 342–347. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G., Rebentisch, E., Riesener, M., Diels, F., Dölle, C. and Eich, S. (2017b), “Agile-waterfall hybrid product development in the manufacturing industry—Introducing guidelines for implementation of parallel use of the two models”. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp. 725–729. 10.1109/IEEM.2017.8289986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, A.P., Clausing, D.P., Fricke, E. and Negele, H. (2000), “Development and integration of winning technologies as key to competitive advantage”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 180–211. 10.1002/1520-6858(2000)3:4%3C180::AID-SYS2%3E3.0.CO;2-H.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timinger, H. (2017), Modernes Projektmanagement: Mit traditionellem, agilem und hybridem Vorgehen zum Erfolg, Wiley, Weinheim.Google Scholar
Timinger, H. and Seel, C. (2016), “Ein Ordnungsrahmen für adaptives hybrides Projektmanagement.”, GPM-Magazin PMaktuell, 04/2016 No. 04, pp. 55–61.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2019), VDI 2221 -Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme Modell der Produktentwicklung- Blatt 1 No. VDI2221.Google Scholar
Vetter, M. (2011), Praktiken des Prototyping im Innovationsprozess von Start-up-Unternehmen, Diss., 2011, Gabler Research, 1. Aufl., Gabler, Wiesbaden. 10.1007/978-3-8349-6968-2.Google Scholar