Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:20:27.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prototyping future societies: GIGA-mapping and narratives as design material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Brita Fladvad Nielsen ,
Gunika Rishi  and
Mari Bjerck
Brita Fladvad Nielsen
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Gunika Rishi*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Mari Bjerck
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
*
gunika.rishi@ntnu.no

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Norway, the housing challenges faced by migrant workers highlight increasing inequality. Designers striving to create more equitable and sustainable futures must adopt system-oriented tools and human-centered approaches. Utilizing giga-mapping and narratives as prototypes helps reframe issues, enhance communication, and simplify complexity into actionable steps. However, successful outcomes demand refined application and careful attention to communication, necessitating significant investment of time, skills, and effort.

Keywords

design methodsprototypingsocial innovationgiga-mappingnarrative design
Type
Design Theory and Research Methods
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 75 - 84
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Blaasvaer, L. (1), & Sevaldson, B. (2). (2019). EDUCATIONAL PLANNING FOR SYSTEMS- ORIENTED DESIGN: APPLYING SYSTEMIC RELATIONSHIPS TO META-MAPPING OF GIGA MAPS. DS 95: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 12th -13th September 2019. 21st International Conference on Engineering & Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019). https://doi.org/10.35199/epde2019.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomkvist, J. (2014). Representing Future Situations of Service: Prototyping in Service Design. https://doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-105499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomkvist, J., & Holmlid, S. (2010). Service Prototyping According to Service Design Practitioners. Service Design and Service Innovation, 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (1997). The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. Flamingo.Google Scholar
Davidova, M. (2017). Systemic Approach to Architectural Performance. FormAkademisk, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidova, M. (2018). Roles, Agency and Relations of Gigamaps in Systemic Approach to Architectural Performance: The Special Prototypes of Post-Anthropocene (pp. 104–119).Google Scholar
Davidova, M., & Zímová, K. (2018). COLridor: Co-design and co-living urban adaptation. FormAkademisk, 11(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.2647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farahmand, A., & Brevik, E. M. (2022). Sårbare arbeidsinnvandreres situasjon i Norge [Master thesis, NTNU]. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/3023100Google Scholar
Friberg, J. H. (2016). Arbeidsmigrasjon Hva vet vi om konsekvensene for norsk arbeidsliv, samfunn og økonomi? Fafo, 50.Google Scholar
Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2014). How Prototyping Helps to Solve Wicked Problems. In Design Thinking Research: Building Innovation Eco-Systems (pp. 105–113). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01303-9_8Google Scholar
Jones, N. N. (2016). Narrative Inquiry in Human-Centered Design: Examining Silence and Voice to Promote Social Justice in Design Scenarios. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvam, E. (2021). Giga-Mapping and Knowledge of Boundary Object Theory in Sustainable Product Development. In 6. The Design Society. https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2021.58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauff, C., Kotys-Schwartz, D., & Rentschler, M. (2018). What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies? Journal of Mechanical Design, 140. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakhimovsky, Y., Miller, A., Dimopoulos, T., & Siliski, M. (2010). Behind the scenes of google maps navigation: Enabling actionable user feedback at scale. 3763–3768. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ødegård, A. M., & Andersen, R. K. (2021). Working and living conditions among resident migrants from Poland and Lithuania. Fafo, 70.Google Scholar
Quesenbery, W., & Brooks, K. (2010). Storytelling for User Experience: Crafting Stories for Better Design. Rosenfeld Media.Google Scholar
Rishi, G. (2021). Between housing and home - Housing experiences of transmigrant labour workers in Trondheim: A narrative enquiry [Master thesis, NTNU]. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/3034030Google Scholar
Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevaldson, B. (2018). Visualizing Complex Design: The Evolution of Gigamaps. In Jones, P. & Kijima, K. (Eds.), Systemic Design: Theory, Methods, and Practice (pp. 243–269). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_8Google Scholar
Sevaldson, B. (2013). Systems Oriented Design: The emergence and development of a designerly approach to address complexity. Learn X Design Conference Series. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/learnxdesign/learnxdesign2013/researchpapers/131. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2013.133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevaldson, B. (2011, June 3). GIGA-Mapping: Visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design. https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2011.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1988). The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial. Design Issues, 4(1/2), 67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, Soo, C, J.. (2009). Donald Schön, Herbert Simon and The Sciences of the Artificial. Design Studies, 30(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerdonk, R. L. van de, G. P. (2023, August 28). From Slim to Smart: How Empathic Design can help understand a craftsmanship-driven factory's manufacturing capabilities for product and production improvement. [Info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis]. University of Twente. https://essay.utwente.nl/97171/Google Scholar