Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:28:47.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation between the Characteristics of Individual and Collaborative Concept Generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

A. Matsumae  and
H. Hirasawa
A. Matsumae*
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
H. Hirasawa
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
*
matsumae@design.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the concept generation process on metacognition, and the relation between individual concept generation characteristics and the nature of collaboration. The results of the experiment revealed that the attitude affects individual concept generation characteristics, the meta-cognition developed and the quality of the concepts generated. In paired concept generation, the awareness and the attitude toward the partner and individual concept generation characteristics affect the nature of both the collaborative process and generated concepts.

Keywords

metacognitionintersubjectivitycollaborative designdesign creativityidea generation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 911 - 920
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Bissola, R. and Imperatori, B. (2011), “Organizing individual and collective creativity: Flying in the face of creativity clichés”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 77–89. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00597.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (2006), “Designerly Ways of Knowing”, Springer, London. 10.1007/1-84628-301-9_1Google Scholar
Détienne, F., Baker, M., Vanhille, M. and Mougenot, C. (2017), “Cultures of collaboration in engineering design education: a contrastive case study in France and Japan”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 5 No. 1–2, pp. 104–128. 10.1080/21650349.2016.1218796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1998), “Mental Space”, Cognitive Science, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 133–187. 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B.W. and Smith, S.M. (1992), Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications, The MIT Press. 10.1176/ajp.151.5.777Google Scholar
Friis, S.A.K. (2015), “Including diversity in creative teamwork in design education”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 3 No. 3–4, pp. 239–255. 10.1080/21650349.2014.892233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessey, B.A. and Amabile, T.M. (2010), “Creativity”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 569–598. 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, X., Li, W. and Cao, L. (2019), “The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 1–11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marques, P.D.B.C., Silva, A.J.P.F., Henriques, E.M.P. and Magee, C.L. (2014), “A descriptive framework of the design process from a dual cognitive-engineering perspective”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp.142–164. 10.1080/21650349.2013.877632Google Scholar
Matsui, T. (2007), “Way of Idea Generation”, Journal of The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Vol. 46 No. 4), pp. 292–297. 10.11499/sicejl1962.46.292Google Scholar
Matsumae, A., Matsumae, S. and Nagai, Y. (2020), “Dynamic relationship design of knowledge co-creating cluster: traditional Japanese architectural industry”, SN Applied Sciences, Springer International Publishing, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 1–11. 10.1007/s42452-020-2209-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumae, A. and Nagai, Y. (2017), “Formation of Inter-Subjectivity as a Basis of Sustainable Collaborative Innovation”, In: Chakrabarti, A. (Ed.), Design Research in Communities, Springer Nature, Singapore, pp. 633–642. 10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumae, A. and Nagai, Y. (2018), “The function of co-creation in dynamic mechanism of intersubjectivity formation among individuals”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 / 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21–24, 2018, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 1925–1936. 10.21278/idc.2018.0141Google Scholar
McCaffrey, T. and Krishnamurty, S. (2015), “The Obscure Features Hypothesis in design innovation”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1–28. 10.1080/21650349.2014.893840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, Y. and Taura, T. (2006), “Formal Description of Concept-synthesizing Process for Creative Design”, Design Computing and Cognition’ 06, pp. 443–460. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijstad, B.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., Rietzschel, E.F. and Baas, M. (2010), “The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence”, European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 34–77. 10.1080/10463281003765323Google Scholar
Santosh, J., Andreas, L., Viktor, H., Elin, O. and Anders, W. (2015), “Interdependency between average novelty, individual average novelty, and variety”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 43–60. 10.1080/21650349.2014.887987Google Scholar
Scupin, R. (1997), “The KJ method: A technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology”, Human Organization, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 233–237. 10.17730/humo.56.2.x335923511444655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S.J., Kim, T.Y., Lee, J.Y. and Bian, L. (2012), “Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 197–212. 10.5465/amj.2010.0270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggar, S. (2002), “Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 315–330. 10.2307/3069349Google Scholar
Taura, T. and Nagai, Y. (2013), “A systematized theory of creative concept generation in design: First-order and high-order concept generation”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 185–199. 10.1007/s00163-013-0152-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taura, T. and Nagai, Y. (2010), “Research Issues and Methodologies in Design Theoretics — From the Viewpoints of ‘Future’, ‘Ideal’ and ‘Composition’ —”, Cognitive Studies, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 389–402. 10.11225/jcss.17.389Google Scholar