Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:16:06.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE RIGHT-TO-REPAIR MOVEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DESIGN IMPLICATIONS: A FOCUS ON THREE INDUSTRIAL SECTORS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Michael Saidani ,
Alicia Kim  and
Madeline Kim
Michael Saidani*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
Alicia Kim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
Madeline Kim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
*
Saidani, Michael, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, France, michael.saidani@centralesupelec.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While products get more challenging to repair, the right-to-repair movement aims to empower consumers in their ability to “use, modify, and repair” a device “whenever, wherever, and however” they want. Here, the best design practices and remaining challenges of three industrial sectors – namely, consumer electronics, biomedical devices, and clothing industry – are investigated in light of the right-to-repair movement. Based on literature reviews and industrial surveys, a SWOT analysis is provided for each sector, and sustainable implications for product repair readiness are drawn. Concretely, recommendations to design, develop and sell products with right-to-repair in mind are given by sector. Future directions for a more quantitative assessment and implementation of design for product repair are discussed to ensure the augmentation of the circularity and sustainability performance of products.

Keywords

Design for X (DfX)SustainabilityCircular economyRight-to-repairProduct design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3463 - 3472
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahmed, A., Bain, S., Hassan Prottoy, S., Morsada, Zinnat., Tauhidul Islam, M., Milon Hossain, Md., and Shkir, M. (2021), “Silk-Templated Nanomaterial Interfaces for Wearables and Bioelectronics: Advances and Prospects”, ACS Materials Letters, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. (2022), It's time for resale to grow up, Circularity Weekly [Online]. Available at: https://info.greenbiz.com/index.php/email/emailWebview?md_id=26600. Accessed November 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Apple, (2022). Apple's Self Service Repair [online] Apple. Available at: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/04/apples-self-service-repair-now-available. Accessed September 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Arena, K. (2020), Medical Device Repair Act: The Right-to-repair. [online] InterMed Group. Available at: https://intermed1.com/medical-device-right-to-repair-act. Accessed May 3, 2022Google Scholar
Azouz, S., Boyll, P., Swanson, M., Castel, N., Maffi, T., and Rebecca, A. M. (2019), “Managing barriers to recycling in the operating room”, The American Journal of Surgery. Vol. 217, No. 4, pp. 634–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insider, Battelle (2021), Building Sustainability into Medical Devices. [online] Inside Battelle. Available at: https://inside.battelle.org/blog-details/building-sustainability-into-medical-devices. Accessed May 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Bracquene, E., et al. (2021), “Analysis of evaluation systems for product repairability: A case study for washing machines”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015), CDC Statement: Los Angeles County/UCLA investigation of CRE transmission and duodenoscopes. [online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/outbreaks/cdcstatement-la-cre.html. Accessed May 3, 2022.Google Scholar
De Fazio, F., Bakker, C., Flipsen, B., and Balkenende, R. (2021), “The Disassembly Map: A new method to enhance design for product repairability”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dottle, R., Gu, J. (2022), The Global Glut of Clothing Is an Environmental Crisis, Bloomberg [Online]. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2022-fashion-industry-environmental-impact. Accessed October 25, 2022.Google Scholar
Faludi, J., Hoffenson, S., Kwok, S. Y., Saidani, M., Hallstedt, S. I., Telenko, C., and Martinez, V. (2020), “A research roadmap for sustainable design methods and tools”, Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 19, 8174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission, Federal Trade. (2021), Nixing the Fix: An FTC Report to Congress on Repair Restrictions, Federal Trade Commission, May 2021, Report.Google Scholar
Hernandez, R. J., Miranda, C., and Goñi, J. (2020), “Empowering sustainable consumption by giving back to consumers the ‘right-to-repair’”, Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3, 850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
iFixit, (2022), Apple DIY repair program. [online] iFixit. Available at: https://www.ifixit.com/News/55370/apple-diy-repair-program-parts-tools-guides-software. Accessed September 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Jaeger-Erben, M., Frick, V., and Hipp, T. (2021), “Why do users (not) repair their devices? A study of the predictors of repair practices”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 286, 125382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albæk, Kamp, Shahbazi, J., McAloone, S., and Pigosso, T. C., C, D.. (2020), “Circularity evaluation of alternative concepts during early product design and development”, sustainability, Vol. 12, No.22, 9353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, C. (2022), Making sustainable medical devices: five top tips. [online] Medical Device Network. Available at: https://www.medicaldevice-network.com/analysis/sustainable-medical-devices/. Accessed May 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Saidani, M., and Kim, H. M. (2021), “Designing an optimal modular-based product family under intellectual property and sustainability considerations”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 143, No. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., Haugrønning, V., Throne-Holst, H., and Strandbakken, P. (2021), “Increasing repair of household appliances, mobile phones and clothing: Experiences from consumers and the repair industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 282, 125349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, L. (2021), Luxury Is That Which You Can Repair?, Vogue [Online]. Available at: https://www.vogue.com/article/repairability-is-the-way-forward-for-fashion. Accessed 20 August 2022.Google Scholar
Mashhadi, A. R., et al. (2016), “Mining consumer experiences of repairing electronics: Product design insights and business lessons learned”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 137, pp. 716–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, N. (2019), Rise of Thrifting: Solution to Fast Fashion or Stealing from the Poor?, Berkeley Economic Review [Online]. Available at: https://econreview.berkeley.edu/rise-of-thrifting-solution-to-fast-fashion-or-stealing-from-the-poor. Accessed September 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Okie, S. (2022), Right-to-repair Revisited. [online] GreenBiz. Available at: https://www.greenbiz.com/article/right-repair-revisited. Accessed September 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Pigosso, D. C., Zanette, E. T., Guelere Filho, A., Ometto, A. R., and Rozenfeld, H. (2010), “Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18, No.1, pp. 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipes, S. (2021), New Medical ‘Right-to-repair’ Legislation Endangers Patients. [online] Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/sallypipes/2021/05/10/new-right-to-repair-legislation-endangers-california-patients/?sh=76035107180c. Accessed May 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Index, Reparability. (2022), Indice de réparabilité Smartphone. [online] L'indice de réparabilité. Available at: https://www.indicereparabilite.fr/appareils/multimedia/smartphone. Accessed November 1, 2022.Google Scholar
Rossi, M., Germani, M., and Zamagni, A. (2016), “Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseaux, P., et al. (2017), ““Eco-tool-seeker”: A new and unique business guide for choosing ecodesign tools”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 151, pp. 546–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidani, M., Cluzel, F., Leroy, Y., Pigosso, D., Kravchenko, M., and Kim, H. (2022), “Nexus Between Life Cycle Assessment, Circularity and Sustainability Indicators—Part II: Experimentations”, Circular Economy and Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1399–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidani, M., Kim, H., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., and Cluzel, F. (2019), “Framing product circularity performance for optimized green profit”, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2019 (ASME IDETC/CIE 2019), Vol. 59223, p. V004T05A022.Google Scholar
Schlossberg, T. (2019), How Fast Fashion Is Destroying the Planet, New York Times [Online]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/03/books/review/how-fast-fashion-is-destroying-the-planet.html Accessed September 12, 2022.Google Scholar
Shah, A. (2018), “Can You Repair What You Own?”, Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 140, No. 9, pp. 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stead, M., Coulton, P. (2022), “A more-than-human right-to-repair”, DRS2022 Bilbao: Design Research Society Conference (Vol. 29).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson-Hoglund, S., et al. (2021), “Barriers, enablers and market governance: A review of the policy landscape for repair of consumer electronics in the EU and the US”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 288, 125488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terzioğlu, N., and Wever, R. (2021), “Integrating Repair into Product Design Education: Insights on Repair, Design and Sustainability”, Sustainability, 13(18), 10067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Repair Association (2022), We Have the Right-to-repair Everything We Own. [online] Repair.org. Available at: https://www.repair.org/aboutus. Accessed May 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Van der Velden, M. (2021), “‘Fixing the World One Thing at a Time’: Community repair and a sustainable circular economy”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 304, 127151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, B. (2022), EU moves to legislate sustainable fashion. Will it work?, Vogue [Online]. Available at: https://www.voguebusiness.com/sustainability/eu-moves-to-legislate-sustainable-fashion-will-itwork. Accessed September 12, 2022.Google Scholar
Woidasky, J., Cetinkaya, E. (2021), “Use pattern relevance for laptop repair and product lifetime”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 288, 125425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar