Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:19:18.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUPPORT FOR MANAGING PARTLY CONFIGURABLE MODULAR SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Jarkko Pakkanen ,
Teuvo Heikkinen ,
Nillo Adlin ,
Timo Lehtonen ,
Janne Mämmelä  and
Tero Juuti
Jarkko Pakkanen*
Affiliation:
Tampere University;
Teuvo Heikkinen
Affiliation:
Konecranes Oyj;
Nillo Adlin
Affiliation:
Tampere University;
Timo Lehtonen
Affiliation:
Tampere University;
Janne Mämmelä
Affiliation:
University of Oulu
Tero Juuti
Affiliation:
Tampere University;
*
Pakkanen, Jarkko Tapani, Tampere University of Technology, Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Systems, Finland, jarkko.pakkanen@tut.fi

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper studies what kind of support could be applied to the management of partly configurable modular systems. The main tasks of product management, product portfolio management and product variety management are defined. In addition, a partly configurable product structure and modular system are defined. Because the limited support in the literature for managing partly configurable modular systems, the article reviews previous product development cases in which authors have been involved on lessons learnt basis, i.e., if the methods and tools used in the cases could provide support for the research objective. As a result, the existing definition of the modular system should be extended by the concepts of non-module and design decision sequence description when dealing with partly configurable modular systems. This is because engineer-to-order should be made possible in cases where it brings clear added value to the customer compared to completely pre-defined solutions that may limit the customer's interest in the offering. Tools to assess the impact of changes to the product offering are required. These should be taken into account in frameworks that are used in method and tool development.

Keywords

ModularisationProduct architectureProduct variety managementProduct structuringPortfolio management
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2791 - 2800
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Andreasen, M.M. (2011), “45 Years with design methodology”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 293–332.10.1080/09544828.2010.538040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgue, O., Panarotto, M. and Isaksson, O. (2019), “Modular product design for additive manufacturing of satellite components: maximising product value using genetic algorithms”, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 331–346.10.1177/1063293X19883421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowski, K.-H. (1961), Das Baukastensystem in Der Technik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-48735-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D.C. (1998), “Defining configuring”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 301–305.10.1017/S0890060498124034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruun, H.P.L., Mortensen, N.H. and Harlou, U. (2013), “PLM Support for Development of Modular Product Families”, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED13, Aug 19-22, 2013., Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Cai, Y.L., Nee, A.Y.C. and Lu, W.-F. (2009), “Optimal Design of Hierarchic Components Platform under Hybrid Modular Architecture”, Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 17, pp. 267–277.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., Edgett, S. and Kleinschmidt, E. (2001), “Portfolio management for new product development: Results of an industry practices study”, R and D Management, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 361–380.10.1111/1467-9310.00225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ElMaraghy, H., Schuh, G., Elmaraghy, W.H., Piller, F.T., Schönsleben, P., Tseng, M. and Bernard, A. (2013), “Product variety management”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, CIRP, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 629–652.10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fixson, S.K. (2006), “A Roadmap for Product Architecture Costing”, in Simpson, T.W., Siddique, Z. & Jiao, R.J. (Ed.), Product Platform and Product Family Design, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, pp. 305–334.10.1007/0-387-29197-0_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forza, C. and Salvador, F. (2008), “Application support to product variety management”, International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Group, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 817–836.Google Scholar
Frankenberger, E. (2007), “Concurrent design and realization of aircraft production flow lines - Process challenges and successful design methods”, Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. DS 42, The Design Society, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, T. (2007), Competing to Be Really, Really Good – The behind-the-Scenes Drama of Capability Building Competition in the Automobile Industry, International House of Japan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Gedell, S. and Johannesson, H. (2013), “Design rationale and system description aspects in product platform design: Focusing reuse in the design lifecycle phase”, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 39–53.10.1177/1063293X12469216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorchels, L. (2003), “Transitioning from engineering to product management”, EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 40–47.Google Scholar
Halonen, N., Lehtonen, T. and Juuti, T. (2014), “Impacts of making design decision sequence explicit on NPD project in forest machinery company”, in Laakso, M. and Ekman, K. (Eds.), DS 81: Proceedings of NordDesign 2014, Espoo, Finland 27-29th August 2014, The Design Society, pp. 702–711.Google Scholar
Haug, A. (2008), Representation of Industrial Knowledge - as a Basis for Developing and Maintaining Product Configurators, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
Jugend, D. and Da Silva, S.L. (2014), “Product-portfolio management: A framework based on methods, organization, and strategy”, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 17–28.10.1177/1063293X13508660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juuti, T. (2008), Design Management of Products with Variability and Commonality - Contribution to the Design Science by Elaborating the Fit Needed between Product Structure, Design Process, Design Goals, and Design Organisation for Improved R&D Efficiency, Tampere University of Technology.Google Scholar
Juuti, T. and Lehtonen, T. (2006), “Using Multiple Modular Structures in Delivering Complex Products”, Proceedings of NordDesign, pp. 266–276.Google Scholar
Kazemzadeh, R.B., Behzadian, M., Aghdasi, M. and Albadvi, A. (2008), “Integration of marketing research techniques into house of quality and product family design”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 41 No. 9-10, pp. 1019–1033.10.1007/s00170-008-1533-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristjansson, A.H., Jensen, T. and Hildre, H.P. (2004), “The term platform in the context of a product developing company”, in Marjanovic, D. (Ed.), Proceedings of DESIGN 2004, the 8th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 325–330.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, T. (2007), Designing Modular Product Architecture in the New Product Development, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, T., Juuti, T., Pulkkinen, A. and Riitahuhta, A. (2003), “Dynamic Modularisation - A challenge for design process and product architecture”, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 03, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Maglyas, A., Nikula, U. and Smolander, K. (2012), “What do practitioners mean when they talk about product management?”, 2012 20th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2012 - Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 261–266.Google Scholar
Mämmelä, J., Juuti, T. and Julkunen, P. (2019), “Technology Valuation Method for Supporting Knowledge Management in Technology Decisions to Gain Sustainability”, Sustainability, MDPI AG, Vol. 11 No. 12, p. 3410.Google Scholar
McNally, R.C., Durmusoglu, S.S., Calantone, R.J. and Harmancioglu, N. (2009), “Exploring new product portfolio management decisions: The role of managers’ dispositional traits”, Industrial Marketing Management, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 127–143.Google Scholar
Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P. (1997), The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadershop, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Murphy, W.H. and Gorchels, L. (1996), “How to improve product management effectiveness”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 47–58.10.1016/0019-8501(95)00063-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, J. (1992), Concurrent Development in Manufacturing - Based on Dispositional Mechanisms, Institute for Engineering Design, The Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (2013), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Vol. 11, Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Pakkanen, J. (2015), Brownfield Process: A Method for the Rationalisation of Existing Product Variety towards a Modular Product Family, Tampere University of Technology.Google Scholar
Pakkanen, J., Juuti, T. and Lehtonen, T. (2016), “Brownfield Process: A method for modular product family development aiming for product configuration”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 45, pp. 210–241.Google Scholar
Pakkanen, J., Juuti, T. and Lehtonen, T. (2019), “Identifying and addressing challenges in the engineering design of modular systems – case studies in the manufacturing industry”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 32–61.10.1080/09544828.2018.1552779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panarotto, M., Isaksson, O., Habbassi, I. and Cornu, N. (2020), “Value-Based Development Connecting Engineering and Business: A Case on Electric Space Propulsion”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, pp. 1–14.10.1109/TEM.2020.3029677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkkinen, A. (2007), Product Configuration in Projecting Company: The Meeting of Configurable Product Families and Sales-Delivery Process, Tampere University of Technology.Google Scholar
Roach, D.C. (2011), “The impact of product management on SME performance: Evidence from Canadian firms”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 695–714.10.1108/14626001111179758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, M.E., Eppinger, S.D. and Rowles, C.M. (2007), “A network approach to define modularity of components in complex products”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 129 No. November 2007, pp. 1118–1129.10.1115/1.2771182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiihonen, J., Lehtonen, T., Soininen, T., Pulkkinen, A., Sulonen, R. and Riitahuhta, A. (1999), “Modelling configurable product families”, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED99, Vol 2, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Tolonen, A., Shahmarichatghieh, M., Harkonen, J. and Haapasalo, H. (2015), “Product portfolio management - Targets and key performance indicators for product portfolio renewal over life cycle”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 170, pp. 468–477.10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulonska, S. and Welo, T. (2014), “Product portfolio map: A visual tool for supporting product variant discovery and structuring”, Advances in Manufacturing, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 179–191.10.1007/s40436-014-0077-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2008), Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Um, J., Lyons, A., Lam, H.K.S., Cheng, T.C.E. and Dominguez-Pery, C. (2017), “Product variety management and supply chain performance: A capability perspective on their relationships and competitiveness implications”, International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 187 No. June 2016, pp. 15–26.10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vähäniitty, J. (2003), “Key decisions in strategic new product development for small software product businesses”, 2003 Proceedings 29th Euromicro Conference, IEEE, Belek-Antalya, Turkey, pp. 375–383.10.1109/EURMIC.2003.1231616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C. and Deubel, T. (2003), “New Theory-Based Concepts for Pdm and Plm”, ICED 03, Stockholm, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Winterkorn, M. and Pötsch, H.D. (2012), “Volkswagen Golf VII: Launch of a new era”, Sardinia.Google Scholar