Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:22:30.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SUPPORT USERS TOWARDS MORE CONSCIOUS FOOD CONSUMPTION HABITS: A CASE STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Monica Bordegoni
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Marina Carulli*
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Elena Spadoni
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
*
Carulli, Marina, Politecnico di Milano Mechanical Engineering Italy, marina.carulli@polimi.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Design for Sustainability is a research area based on a multidisciplinary approach, which has become increasingly important in recent years. Great attention is paid to the design of products that can impact on users' behaviours, through embedded smart technologies, e.g. Internet of Things (IoT). In fact, IoT systems are able to “dialogue” with the users, supporting the identification of any misbehaviour, and suggesting more sustainable ones.

This paper presents a research aiming at supporting users towards more conscious food consumption in their daily life to reduce food waste. As a case study, it has been developed an interactive system in which chicken eggs are used as main communication element. Indeed, the environmental footprint of the egg industry is very heavy, and eggs are one of the main wasted food. The interactive system consists of a physical product, an eggs tray, integrating sensors and actuators for handling the interaction with users. It is accompanied by an interactive application for monitoring eggs consumption, displaying eggs waste statistics, and an Augmented Reality part for children, aimed to improve their awareness about food waste and the impact on their food habits through an “edutainment” approach.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bhamra, T., Lilley, D., Tang, T. (2011), “Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour”, Design Journal, 14(4), pp. 42744510.2752/175630611X13091688930453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhamra, T., Lofthouse, V. (2007), “Design for sustainability: a practical approach”, Gower PublishingGoogle Scholar
Buzby, J.C., Hodan, F.W., Hyman, J. (2014), “The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States”, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 10.2139/ssrn.2501659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceschin, F., Gaziulusoy, I. (2016), “Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions”, Design Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 11816310.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, S., Ferrise, F., Costanzi, A., Bordegoni, M. (2015), ”The Use Of Multisensory Feedback To Make Users Behave In A Sustainable Way”, International Conference On Engineering Design, ICED15, Milano, Italy, 27-30 July 2015Google Scholar
Montazeri, S., Panos, P., Rich, G. (2015), “Design For Behavior Change: An Elaboration-Based Approach To Persuasion In Product Design”, International Conference On Engineering Design, ICED15, Milano, Italy, 27-30 July 2015Google Scholar
Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A. (2005), “Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking”, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511499968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prochaska, J.O.; DiClemente, C.C. (1983), “Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change”. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 51(3), pp. 39039510.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scurati, G.W., Carulli, M., Ferrise, F., Bordegoni, M. (2020), “Sustainable behaviour: A framework for the design of products for behaviour change”, Emotional Engineering, Vol. 8: Emotion in the Emerging World, pp. 658310.1007/978-3-030-38360-2_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvefors, A., Strömberg, H., Renström, S. (2916), “What a designer can change: a proposal for a categorisation of artefact-related aspects”, DRS2016 Conference.10.21606/drs.2016.344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, T., Bhamra, T.A., (2008), “Changing energy consumption behaviour through sustainable product design”. IN: Marjanovic, D. … et al, (eds.). DS 48: Proceedings of DESIGN 2008, the 10th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 19-22 May 2008, pp. 13591366Google Scholar
Wahlen, S., Winkel, T. (2016), “Reference Module in Food Science - Household Food Waste10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.03368-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wever, R., van Kuijk, J., Boks, C. (2008), “User-centred design for sustainable behaviour”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 92010.1080/19397030802166205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar