Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:00:04.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOWARDS REALISTIC NUMERICAL MODELLING OF THIN STRUT-BASED 3D-PRINTED STRUCTURES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Satabdee Dash  and
Axel Nordin
Satabdee Dash*
Affiliation:
Lund University
Axel Nordin
Affiliation:
Lund University
*
Dash, Satabdee, Lund University, Sweden, satabdee.dash@design.lth.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The as-built geometry and material properties of parts manufactured using Additive Manufacturing (AM) can differ significantly from the as-designed model and base material properties. These differences can be more pronounced in thin strut-like features (e.g., in a lattice structure), making it essential to incorporate them when designing for AM and predicting their structural behaviour. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop a numerical model with realistic characteristics based on a thin strut-based test artefact and to use it accurately for estimating its compressive strength. Experiments on test samples produced by selective laser sintering in PA 1101, are used to calculate geometrical deviations, Young's modulus, and yield strength, which are used to calibrate the numerical model. The experimental and numerical results show that the numerical model incorporating geometrical and material deviations can accurately predict the peak load and the force-displacement behaviour. The main contributions of this paper include the design of the test artefact, the average geometrical deviation of the struts, the measured material data, and the developed numerical model.

Keywords

3D printingDesign for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)Lattice structuresComputational design methodsNumerical modelling
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3591 - 3600
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Al-Saedi, D. S. J., Masood, S. H., Faizan-Ur-Rab, M., Alomarah, A. and Ponnusamy, P. (2018), “Mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of functionally graded F2BCC lattice fabricated by SLM”, Materials & Design, Vol. 144, pp. 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, S. G. P., Zimmermann, R., Arbelo, M. A., Khakimova, R., Hilburger, M. W. and Degenhardt, R. (2014), “Geometric imperfections and lower-bound methods used to calculate knock-down factors for axially compressed composite cylindrical shells”, Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 74, pp. 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2013.08.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallago, M., Zanini, F., Carmignato, S., Pasini, D. and Benedetti, M. (2018), “Effect of the geometrical defectiveness on the mechanical properties of SLM biomedical Ti6Al4V lattices”, Procedia Structural Integrity, Vol. 13, pp. 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dash, S. and Nordin, A. (2022), “Effects of print orientation on the design of additively manufactured bio-based flexible lattice structures”, DS 118: Proceedings of NordDesign 2022, Design Society, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35199/NORDDESIGN2022.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Pastre, M.-A., Toguem Tagne, S.-C. and Anwer, N. (2020), “Test artefacts for additive manufacturing: A design methodology review”, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Vol. 31, pp. 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EOS GmBHa. “Formiga P 110 Velocis SLS machine”. [online]. Available at: https://www.eos.info/en/additive-manufacturing/3d-printing-plastic/eos-polymer-systems/formiga-p-110-velocis (accessed 15/11/2022).Google Scholar
EOS GmBHb. “PA 1101 Material datasheet”. [online]. Available at: https://www.eos.info/en/additive-manufacturing/3d-printing-plastic/sls-polymer-materials/pa-11-nylon-abs-pa6 (accessed 15/11/2022).Google Scholar
Gautam, R., Idapalapati, S. and Feih, S. (2018), “Printing and characterisation of Kagome lattice structures by fused deposition modelling”, Materials & Design, Vol. 137, pp. 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorguluarslan, R. M., Park, S.-I., Rosen, D. W. and Choi, S.-K. (2015), “A multilevel upscaling method for material characterization of additively manufactured part under uncertainties”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 11, p. 111408. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, W. and Hilburger, M. W. (2010), “Comparison of methods to predict lower bound buckling loads of cylinders under axial compression”, Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyibilgin, O., Yigit, C. and Leu, M. C. (2013), “Experimental investigation of different cellular lattice structures manufactured by fused deposition modeling”, 24th International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 2013, pp. 895–907.Google Scholar
Karamooz Ravari, M. R. and Kadkhodaei, , M. (2014), “A computationally efficient modeling approach for predicting mechanical behavior of cellular lattice structures”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-1281-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummert, C., Schmid, H.-J., Risse, L. and Kullmer, G. (2021), “Mechanical characterization and numerical modeling of laser-sintered TPE lattice structures”, Journal of Materials Research, Vol. 36 No. 16, pp. 3182–3193. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00321-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S.-i., Rosen, D. and Duty, C. (2014), “Comparing mechanical and geometrical properties of lattice structure fabricated using Electron Beam Melting”, 2014 Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, USA, 6 Aug 2014, Vol. 1, pp. 1359–1370.Google Scholar
Salazar, A., Rico, A., Rodríguez, J., Segurado Escudero, J., Seltzer, R. and Martin de la Escalera Cutillas, F. (2014), “Monotonic loading and fatigue response of a bio-based polyamide PA11 and a petrol-based polyamide PA12 manufactured by selective laser sintering”, European Polymer Journal, Vol. 59, pp. 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GmBHa, Sauter. “Instruction Manual SAUTER TVL series”. [online]. Available at: https://docs.rs-online.com/6664/0900766b81686e53.pdf (accessed 29/11/2022).Google Scholar
GmBHb, Sauter. “Digital force gauge FH-S”. [online]. Available at: https://www.kern-sohn.com/shop/de/messinstrumente/kraftmessgeraete/FH-S/ (accessed 29/11/2022).Google Scholar
Sindinger, S.-L., Kralovec, C., Tasch, D. and Schagerl, M. (2020), “Thickness dependent anisotropy of mechanical properties and inhomogeneous porosity characteristics in laser-sintered polyamide 12 specimens”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 33, p. 101141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tancogne-Dejean, T., Spierings, A. B. and Mohr, D. (2016), “Additively-manufactured metallic micro-lattice materials for high specific energy absorption under static and dynamic loading”, Acta Materialia, Vol. 116, pp. 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R. I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., Schulz, J., Graf, P., Ahuja, B. and Martina, F. (2016), “Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004. English.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tkac, J., Samborski, S., Monkova, K. and Debski, H. (2020), “Analysis of mechanical properties of a lattice structure produced with the additive technology”, Composite Structures, Vol. 242, p. 112138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagne, Toguem, Rupal, S.-C., Mehdi-Souzani, B. S., Qureshi, C., and Anwer, A. J., N. (2018), “A Review of AM Artifact Design Methods”, euspen ASPE Summer Tropical Meeting on Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing, Berkeley, CA, USA, 22-25 July 2018.Google Scholar
Vrana, R., Koutecky, T., Cervinek, O., Zikmund, T., Pantelejev, L., Kaiser, J. and Koutny, D. (2022), “Deviations of the SLM Produced Lattice Structures and Their Influence on Mechanical Properties”, Materials, Vol. 15 No. 9, p. 3144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, H., Meng, J., Liu, J., Ao, X., Lin, S. and Yang, Y. (2022), “Evaluation of the Equivalent Mechanical Properties of Lattice Structures Based on the Finite Element Method”, Materials, Vol. 15 No. 9, p. 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15092993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, L., Song, W., Wang, C., Liu, H., Tang, H. and Wang, J. (2015), “Mechanical behavior of open-cell rhombic dodecahedron Ti–6Al–4V lattice structure”, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, Vol. 640, pp. 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar