Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:19:02.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding and definition of scanning and monitoring of the future space in the context of the product engineering process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Albert Albers ,
Carsten Thümmel ,
Jessica Schmidt ,
Stefan Eric Schwarz ,
Michael Schlegel ,
Andreas Siebe  and
Tobias Düser
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Carsten Thümmel*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Jessica Schmidt
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Stefan Eric Schwarz
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Michael Schlegel
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Andreas Siebe
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Tobias Düser
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
carsten.thuemmel@kit.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using foresight methods such as scenarios, possible futures can be described and anticipated. Needs and requirements as well as product properties can be derived from that, which is necessary to plan successful products for future customers. Changes that occur in the future development can be identified with monitoring and the expected future can be adjusted. A consistent understanding of the use of monitoring for the product engineering process does not exist and is developed in this paper. Thereby, monitoring is considered in the context of validation and located in iPeM.

Keywords

design processforesightmonitoringproduct developmentvalidation
Type
Design Information and Knowledge
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 363 - 372
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albers, A. (2010), “Five Hypotheses about Engineering Processes and their Consequences”, Proceedings of the TMCE 2010, Ancona, I, April 12–16, 2010.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Behrendt, M., Klingler, S. and Matros, K. (2016a), “Verifikation und Validierung im Produktentstehungsprozess”, in Lindemann, U. (Ed.), Handbuch Produktentwicklung, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, pp. 541–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A. and Gausemeier, J. (2012), “Von der fachdisziplinorientierten Produktentwicklung zur Vorausschauenden und Systemorientierten Produktentstehung”, in Smart Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Hirschter, T., Richter, T., Reiß, N., Maier, A. and Bursac, N. (2018a), “Managing Systems of Objectives in the agile Development of Mechatronic Systems by ASD – Agile Systems Design”, in 13th NordDesign Conference (NordDesign 2018), NordDesign Conference, The Design Society, Linköping, Schweden.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Walter, B., Basedow, G.N., Reiß, N., Heitger, N., Ott, S. and Bursac, N. (2018b), “Product Profiles: Modelling customer benefits as a foundation to bring inventions to innovations”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, pp. 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Kürten, C., Rapp, S., Birk, C., Hünemeyer, S. and Kempf, C. (2022), “SGE – Systemgenerationsentwicklung: Analyse und Zusammenhänge von Entwicklungspfaden in der Produktentstehung”, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364185334_SGE_-_Systemgenerationsentwicklung_Analyse_und_Zusammenhange_von_Entwicklungspfaden_in_der_Produktentstehung.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Matros, K., Behrendt, M. and Jetzinger, H. (2015), “Das Pull-Prinzip der Validierung. Ein Referenzmodell zur effizienten Integration von Validierungsaktivitäten in den Produktentstehungsprozess”, Konstruktion, Vol. 67 No. 06, pp. 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Reiss, N., Bursac, N. and Richter, T. (2016b), “iPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dictionary, Cambridge (2023), “Monitoring”, available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/monitoring (accessed 5 November 2023).Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1993), “Screening new products for potential winners”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, A. and Siebe, A. (2016), Szenario-Management: Von strategischem Vorausdenken zu zukunftsrobusten Entscheidungen, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, New York.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Echterfeld, J., Pfänder, T., Steffen, D. and Thielemann, F. (2019), Innovationen für die Märkte von morgen: Strategische Planung von Produkten, Dienstleistungen und Geschäftsmodellen, Hanser, München.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Fink, A. and Schlake, O. (1998), “Scenario Management. An Approach to Develop Future Potentials”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 59 (2), pp. 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Ovtcharova, J., Amshoff, B., Eckelt, D., Elstermann, M., Placzek, M. and Wiederkehr, O. (2016), “Strategische Produktplanung. Adaptierbare Methoden, Prozesse und IT-Werkzeuge für die Planung der Marktleistungen von morgen”.Google Scholar
Gruber, M., Kolpatzik, B.W., Schönhut, J. and Venter, C. (2003), “Die Rolle des Corporate Foresight im Innovationsprozess: Ziele, Ausgestaltung und Erfahrungen am Beispiel der Siemens AG”, Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation, Vol. 72 No. ARTICLE.Google Scholar
Gruber, M. and Venter, C. (2006), “„Die Kunst, die Zukunft zu erfinden“ — Theoretische Erkenntnisse und empirische Befunde zum Einsatz des Corporate Foresight in deutschen Großunternehmen”, Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 58 No. 7, pp. 958–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, D. and Taylor, B. (2006), Strategische Unternehmungsplanung - Strategische Unternehmungsführung: Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen, 9th ed., Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksson, O., Arnarsson, Í., Bergsjö, D., Catic, A., Gustafsson, G., Kaya, O., Landahl, J., Levandowski, C., Malmqvist, J., Müller, J., Raja, V., Raudberget, D.S., Stenholm, D. and Ström, M. (2017), “Trends, observations and drivers for change in systems engineering design”, in Maier, Anja, Škec, Stanko, Kim, Harrison, Kokkolaras, Michael, Oehmen, Josef, Fadel, Georges, Salustri, Filippo, Van der Loos, Mike (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st international Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), ICED, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 201–210.Google Scholar
Jesemann, I., Beichter, T., Herburger, K., Constantinescu, C. and Rüger, M. (2020), “Migration of the Lean-Startup approach from High-Tech startups towards product design in large manufacturing companies”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 91, pp. 594–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krystek, U. (2007), “Strategische Früherkennung”, Controlling & Management, Vol. 51 No. S2, pp. 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuebler, M., Thümmel, C., Spekker, M., Siebe, A. and Albers, A. (2023), “Weiterentwicklung und Evaluation einer Systematik zur Bestimmung sich ändernder Produkteigenschaften”, paper presented at 17. Symposium für Vorausschau und Technologieplanung, 14.-15.09.2023, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lasinger, D. (2011), Die Leistung vor der Innovation: Ermittlung und Nutzung schwacher Signale von Chancen, SpringerLink Bücher, Gabler, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, U. (Ed.) (2016), Handbuch Produktentwicklung, Carl Hanser Verlag, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. and Shi, Y. (2020), “Behind the scenes”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 5, pp. 1061–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marthaler, F. (2021), “Zukunftsorientierte Produktentwicklung – Eine Systematik zur Ableitung von generationsübergreifenden Zielsystemen zukünftiger Produktgenerationen durch strategische Vorausschau = Future-Oriented Product Development – a Systematic Approach to Deriving Cross-Generational Systems of Objectives of Future Product Generations Through Strategic Foresight”, Dissertation, IPEK, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe, 2021.Google Scholar
Meyer-Schwickerath, B. (2014), “Vorausschau im Produktentstehungsprozess - Das integrierte Produktentstehungs-Modell (iPeM) als Bezugsrahmen für Vorausschau am Beispiel von Szenariotechnik und strategischer Frühaufklärung”, 1615-8113.Google Scholar
Micic, P. (2007), “Phenomenology of future management in top management teams”, Leeds Metropolitan University, 2007.Google Scholar
Nijssen, E.J., Hillebrand, B., de Jong, J.P.J. and Kemp, R.G.M. (2012), “Strategic Value Assessment and Explorative Learning Opportunities with Customers”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 29 No. S1, pp. 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patnaik, D. and Becker, R. (1999), “Needfinding: The Why and How of Uncovering People's Needs”, Design Management Journal (Former Series), Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrbeck, R. and Gemünden, H.G. (2008), “Die Rolle der Strategischen Frühaufklärung im Innovationsmanagement”, in Spektrum des Produktions- und Innovationsmanagements, Gabler, pp. 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropohl, G. (Ed.) (1975), Systemtechnik: Grundlagen und Anwendung, Hanser, München.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1939), Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Siebe, A. (Ed.) (2018), Die Zukunft vorausdenken und gestalten: Stärkung der Strategiekompetenz im Spitzencluster it's OWL, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verganti, R. (1997), “Leveraging on systemic learning to manage the early phases of product innovation projects”, R & D Management, Vol. 27, pp. 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, V., Kempf, C., Hartmann, L., Bursac, N. and Albers, A. (Eds.) (2021), Umgang mit Marktunsicherheiten in der Zielsystementwicklung: Methode zur Reduktion von Definitionslücken bei der Konkretisierung des Initialen Zielsystems: EEE 2021 - Entwerfen Entwickeln Erleben in Produktentwicklung und Design 2021. Hrsg.: R. Stelzer, TUDpress.Google Scholar