Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T12:06:44.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UNDERSTANDING USERS AND PRODUCTS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: THE APPLICATION OF PRODUCT USAGE INFORMATION AND ITS CHALLENGES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Quan Deng ,
Stefan Wellsandt ,
Karl Hribernik  and
Klaus-Dieter Thoben
Quan Deng*
Affiliation:
BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH
Stefan Wellsandt
Affiliation:
BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH
Karl Hribernik
Affiliation:
BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH
Klaus-Dieter Thoben
Affiliation:
Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Bremen
*
Deng, Quan, BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH, IKAP, Germany, dqu@biba.uni-bremen.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The need to understand users and products is one of the cores for product success. There are many ways to reach this understanding,such as,interviews and consumer cocreation. This study put a focus on the application of product usage information (PUI). Although amount of product-related information is available in the middle of a product's life, producers have not realized the full potential of these data in product development. The academic literature describes various use cases that outline how PUI supports this kind of understanding, and eventually benefits product development. Each of them provides fragmented information from certain perspectives. This diversity and the lack of systematic overview facilitates a fragmentation in the research of PUI usage in product development. To have an initial and unified overview of PUI's value on the understanding of users and products, this paper conducted a combination of systematic and descriptive review to form a sample with 12 papers. The result indicates that PUI increases producer's understanding about the product, its users and the context of usage. However, producers need to address several challenges if they want to apply PUI in product development successfully.

Keywords

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)Case studyDesign informaticsProduct Usage InformationProduct Improvement
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 3299 - 3308
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abramovici, M., Gebus, P., Göbel, J.C. and Savarino, P. (2017), “Utilizing unstructured feedback data from MRO reports for the continuous improvement of standard products”, DS 87-6 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vol 6: Design Information and Knowledge, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08.2017.Google Scholar
Cantamessa, M., Montagna, F. and Cascini, G. (2016), “Design for innovation – A methodology to engineer the innovation diffusion into the development process”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 75, pp. 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Q., Wellsandt, S., Hribernik, K.A. and Thoben, K.-D. (2019), “Towards Understanding the Role of Product Usage Information in Product Design Improvement”, 16th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, PLM 2019, IFIP AICT Vol. 565, Springer, Cham, pp. 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edler, A. (2001), Nutzung von Felddaten in der qualitätsgetriebenen Produktentwicklung und im Service. Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin. https://doi.org/10.14279/DEPOSITONCE-370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, C. and Sarakakis, G. (2016), “Data driven design for reliability”, 2016 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Tucson, AZ, USA, 2016, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2016.7448023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, L., Chen, W., Hoyle, C. and Yannou, B. (2012), “Choice Modeling for Usage Context-Based Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 134 No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, T., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y. and Poirson, E. (2019), “An affordance-based online review analysis framework”, DS 94: Proceedings of the Design Society: 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 2457–2466. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagtap, S. and Johnson, A. (2011), “In-service information required by engineering designers”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-011-0107-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, J., Liu, Y., Ji, P. and Liu, H. (2016), “Understanding big consumer opinion data for market-driven product design”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 54 No. 10, pp. 3019–3041. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.-S. and Noh, Y. (2019), “Elicitation of design factors through big data analysis of online customer reviews for washing machines”, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 2785–2795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0525-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, P., van der Vegte, W.F., Hribernik, K. and Klaus-Dieter, T. (2019), “Towards an approach integrating various levels of data analytics to exploit product-usage information in product development”, DS 94: Proceedings of the Design Society: 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), pp. 2627–2636. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2012), Marketing management, 14th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Lindström, J. (2017), “Improving Functional Product Availability: Software-related Measures Planned and Taken”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 59, pp. 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2007), Engineering Design:A Systematic Approach, Springer London, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M. and Kitsiou, S. (2015), “Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews”, Information and Management, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petkova, V. (2003), An analysis of field feedback in consumer electronics industry, Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Shin, J.-H., Kiritsis, D. and Xirouchakis, P. (2015), “Design modification supporting method based on product usage data in closed-loop PLM”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.900866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotos, C., Okudan Kremer, G.E. and Akman, G. (2014), “Customer needs based product family sizing design: The viper case study”, Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design: Methods and Applications, Springer New York, pp. 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, S.-T., Hsu, N.-J. and Lin, Y.-C. (2016), “Joint modeling of laboratory and field data with application to warranty prediction for highly reliable products”, IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), Vol. 48 No. 8, pp. 710–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1133941.Google Scholar
Tuarob, S. and Tucker, C.S. (2014), “Discovering next generation product innovations by identifying lead user preferences expressed through large scale social media data”, ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC201434767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eck, M.L., Markslag, E., Sidorova, N., Brosens-Kessels, A. and van der Aalst, W. (2019), “Data-driven usability test scenario creation”, 7th International Working Conference on Human-Centered Software Engineering, HCSE 2018, Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05909-5_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VDI (1993), VDI-Richtlinie 2221: Methodik zum Entwickeln und Konstruieren technischer Systeme und Produkte, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Voet, H., Altenhof, M., Ellerich, M., Schmitt, R.H. and Linke, B. (2019), “A Framework for the Capture and Analysis of Product Usage Data for Continuous Product Improvement”, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 141 No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellsandt, S., Hribernik, K. and Thoben, K.-D. (2015), “Sources and Characteristics of Information about Product Use”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 36, pp. 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellsandt, S., Thoben, K.-D. and Klein, P. (2018), “Information Feedback in Product Development: Analysing Practical Cases”, DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, University of Zagreb, Croatia, May, 21-24, 2018; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 1745–1756. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar