Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:57:33.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WORK IN PROGRESS: DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL KIT FOR TEACHING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Filip Valjak*
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
Ana Kapetanović
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
Ivona Taradi
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
Nenad Bojčetić
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
*
Valjak, Filip, University of Zagreb, FSB, Croatia, fvaljak@fsb.hr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a unique manufacturing technology that is being rapidly accepted in various industries, leading to increased demand for experts who know to work with AM and how to design AM products. This led to a broader adaptation of AM in an educational context with various research on how to teach AM. However, most approaches are focused on teaching advanced AM application and Design for AM (DfAM), including both restrictive and opportunistic approaches, with little attention to specialised educational tools to show and teach the basic principle, possibilities and characteristics of AM. This paper presents the development of an Educational Kit for AM to address the gap and help teachers to explain the basics of AM, with a current focus on the material extrusion process. The Educational Kit is made of 17 models and accompanied cards explaining the essential characteristics of AM through short textual explanations, graphics, examples and manufacturing data. The Educational Kit for AM is intended to be used in introductory lessons on AM, so the novices in AM can quickly grasp the characteristics of AM and the basic terms used in AM before advancing to other AM and DfAM topics.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Asiabanpour, B. (2019), “Additive Manufacturing: Instrumental Systems Used in Research, Education, and Service”, In: Pei, E., Monzón, M., Bernard, A. (Ed.), Additive Manufacturing – Developments in Training and Education, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 3552, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76084-1_3Google Scholar
Borgianni, Y., Maccioni, L., Russo Spena, P. and Shunmugavel, M.K. (2019), “University Education in Additive Manufacturing and the Need to Boost Design Aspects”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 629638, http://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.67Google Scholar
Borgianni, Y., Pradel, P., Berni, A., Obi, M. and Bibb, R. (2022), “An investigation into the current state of education in Design for Additive Manufacturing”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 33 No. 7, pp. 461490, http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2102893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L.S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K. and Kestin, G. (2019), “Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116 No. 39, pp. 1925119257, http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diegel, O., Nordin, A. and Motte, D. (2019), A Practical Guide to Design for Additive Manufacturing, Springer Singapore, Singapore, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8281-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudescu, C. and Racz, L. (2017), “Effects of Raster Orientation, Infill Rate and Infill Pattern on the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Materials”, ACTA Universitatis Cibiniensis, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 2330, http://doi.org/10.1515/aucts-2017-0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felder, R.M. and Silverman, L.K. (1988), “Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education”, Engineering Education, Vol. 78 No. 7, pp. 674681Google Scholar
Ford, S. and Minshall, T. (2019), “Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 25, pp. 131150, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M.P. (2014), “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111 No. 23, pp. 84108415, http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C.B., Wang, C.C.L., et al. (2015), “The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 69, pp. 6589, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. and Stucker, B. (2015), Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer New York, New York, NY, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Go, J. and Hart, A.J. (2016), “A framework for teaching the fundamentals of additive manufacturing and enabling rapid innovation”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 10, pp. 7687, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. and Sever, A.L. (2011), “Inspiring design ideas with texts”, Design Studies, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 139155, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2014), “What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation”, Design Studies, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 2953, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, J., Brehm, L., Gunzel, H. and Humpe, A. (2020), “Teaching 3D Printing Technology Hands-on”, 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), IEEE, pp. 953957, http://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helge Bøhn, J. (1997), “Integrating rapid prototyping into the engineering curriculum - a case study”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 3237, http://doi.org/10.1108/13552549710169264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, A. (2019), “Work in Progress: 3-D Models with Lesson Plans”, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO. (2021), ISO/ASTM 52900:2021(En) Additive Manufacturing — General Principles — Fundamentals and Vocabulary.Google Scholar
Leary, M., Mazur, M., McMillan, M., Brandt, M. and Subic, A. (2015), “[DesktopLabs] Desktop Laboratories: Web Share and Additive Manufacture of Engineering Educational Models”, Procedia Technology, Vol. 20, pp. 111116, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.07.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, H. (2007), “Printable 3D models for customized hands-on education”, Mass Customization and Personalization (MCPC) 2007.Google Scholar
Meyers, M.S. and Jones, T.B. (1993), Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Obi, M.U., Pradel, P., Sinclair, M. and Bibb, R. (2022), “A bibliometric analysis of research in design for additive manufacturing”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 967987, http://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2020-0291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, E., Monzón, M. and Bernard, A. (Eds.). (2019), Additive Manufacturing – Developments in Training and Education, Springer International Publishing, Cham, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76084-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, R., Bracken, J., Armstrong, C.B., Jablokow, K., Simpson, T.W. and Meisel, N.A. (2020), “Additive creativity: investigating the use of design for additive manufacturing to encourage creativity in the engineering design industry”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 198222, http://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1813633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, R., Miller, S.R., Simpson, T.W. and Meisel, N.A. (2020a), “But Will It Build? Assessing Student Engineering Designers’ Use of Design for Additive Manufacturing Considerations in Design Outcomes”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 9, http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, R., Miller, S.R., Simpson, T.W. and Meisel, N.A. (2020b), “Built to win? Exploring the role of competitive environments on students’ creativity in design for additive manufacturing tasks”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 31 No. 11–12, pp. 574604, http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2020.1851661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seepersad, C.C. (2014), “Challenges and Opportunities in Design for Additive Manufacturing”, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1013, http://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2013.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M.K., Chasteen, S.v., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S.E., Eagan, M.K., et al. (2018), “Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities”, Science, Vol. 359 No. 6383, pp. 14681470, http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, A., Rosenthal, Y., Dresler, N. and Ashkenazi, D. (2019), “Additive manufacturing: An education strategy for engineering students”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 27, pp. 503514, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M.K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R.I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., et al. (2016), “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 737760, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlers, T. (2022), Wohlers Report 2022, Wohlers Associates.Google Scholar