Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T19:05:55.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Normalizers of finite multiplicity nests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Kenneth R. Davidson
Kenneth R. Davidson
Affiliation:
Pure Mathematics Department University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3GL Canada E-mail address: krdavids@math.uwaterloo.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that every continuous nest of bounded multiplicity is unitarily equivalent to itself in a non-trivial way. Along the way, it is shown that no finite (measurable) partition of the unit interval can separate absolutely continuous homeomorphisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 337 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1996

References

REFERENCES

1. Anoussis, M. and Katavolos, A., Unitary actions of nests and the Weyl relations, Bull. Land. Math. Soc. 27 (1995), 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Davidson, K. R., Similarity and compact perturbations of nest algebras, J. Reine. Angew. Math. 348 (1984), 286–294.Google Scholar
3. Davidson, K. R. Nest Algebras (Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 191, Longman Scientific and Technical Pub. Co., London, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
4. Davidson, K. R. and Wagner, B., Automorphisms of quasitriangular algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 59 (1984), 612–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Erdos, J. A., Unitary invariants for nests, Pacific J. Math. 23 (1967), 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kadison, R. V. and Singer, I. M., Triangular operator algebras, Amer. J. Math. 82 (1960), 227–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ringrose, J. R., On some algebras of operators, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 15 (1965), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar