Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:37:05.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3D moving mesh simulations of Galactic center cloud G2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

P. C. Fragile
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, College of Charleston 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424, USA email: fragilep@cofc.edu
P. Anninos
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94550, USA
S. D. Murray
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94550, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using three-dimensional, moving-mesh simulations, we investigate the future evolution of the recently discovered gas cloud G2 traveling through the galactic center. From our simulations we expect an average feeding rate onto Sgr A* in the range of (5−19) × 10−8M yr−1 beginning in 2014. This accretion varies by less than a factor of three on timescales ∼ 1 month, and shows no more than a factor of 10 difference between the maximum and minimum observed rates within any given model. These rates are comparable to the current estimated accretion rate in the immediate vicinity of Sgr A*, although they represent only a small (< 10%) increase over the current expected feeding rate at the effective inner boundary of our simulations (racc = 750 RS ∼ 1015 cm). We also explore multiple possible equations of state to describe the gas. In examining the Br-γ light curves produced from our simulations, we find that all of our isothermal models predict significant (factor of 10) enhancements in the luminosity of G2 as it approaches pericenter, in conflict with observations. Models that instead allow the cloud to heat as it is compressed do better at matching observations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Anninos, P., Fragile, P. C., Wilson, J., & Murray, S. D. 2012, ApJ 759, 132Google Scholar
Ballone, A., Schartmann, M., Burkert, A., Gillessen, S., Genzel, R., Fritz, T. K., Eisenhauer, F., Pfuhl, O., & Ott, T. 2013, ApJ 776, 13Google Scholar
Gillessen, S., Genzel, R., Fritz, T. K., et al. 2012, Nature 481, 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phifer, K., Do, T., Meyer, L., Ghez, A. M., Witzel, G., Yelda, S., Boehle, A., Lu, J. R., Morris, M. R., Becklin, E. E., & Matthews, K. 2013, ApJ 773, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shcherbakov, R. V. 2013, submitted to ApJGoogle Scholar