Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:42:25.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A search for correlations between turbulence and star formation in LITTLE THINGS and THINGS galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

Bruce G. Elmegreen Open the ORCID record for Bruce G. Elmegreen [Opens in a new window] ,
Deidre Hunter ,
Zorayda Martinez ,
Haylee Archer ,
Caroline E. Simpson  and
Phil Cigan
Bruce G. Elmegreen
Affiliation:
IBM Research, T.J. Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Deidre Hunter
Affiliation:
Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA
Zorayda Martinez
Affiliation:
Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA Department of Astronomy and Planetary Science, Northern Arizona University, 527 S. Beaver Street, Flastaff, Arizona 86011
Haylee Archer
Affiliation:
Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA
Caroline E. Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Florida International University, CP 204, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199 USA
Phil Cigan
Affiliation:
George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Azimuthal variations in HI velocity dispersion do not correlate with variations in the star formation rate per unit area, SFR/A, suggesting that local star formation does not increase HI turbulence significantly. These variations are determined for each pixel in HI and FUV maps of THINGS and LITTLE THINGS galaxies by subtracting the average radial profiles from the measured quantities. The kinetic energy density and HI surface density increase slightly with SFR/A, suggesting that feedback goes into pushing the local dense gas around without increasing the velocity dispersion. We suggest that star formation feedback does not promote large-scale stability against gravitational forces through turbulence regulation, and that gravitational energy from recurrent instabilities drives turbulence on galactic scales.

Keywords

star formationgravitational instabilityturbulencefeedback
Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 17 , Symposium S373: Resolving the Rise and Fall of Star Formation in Galaxies , August 2021 , pp. 93 - 97
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Bacchini, C., Fraternali, F., Iorio, G., Pezzulli, G. Marasco, A., Nipoti, C. 2020, A&A, 641, A70 Google Scholar
Bertin, G., Lodato, G., 2001, A&A, 370, 342 Google Scholar
Bethune, W., Latter, H., Kley, W., 2021, A&A, 650, 49 Google Scholar
Booth, R. A., Clarke, C. J., 2019, MNRAS, 483, 3718 10.1093/mnras/sty3340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Krumholz, M.R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 272 10.1093/mnras/stab2938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmegreen, B.G., Elmegreen, D.M., Leitner, S.L. 2003, Ap.J., 590, 271 10.1086/374860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmegreen, B.G., Martinez, Z., Hunter, D.A. (2022) Ap.J. 928, 143 10.3847/1538-4357/ac559cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genzel, R., Newman, S., Jones, T. et al., 2011, Ap.J., 733, 101 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldbaum, N.J., Krumholz, M.R., Forbes, J.C. 2016, Ap.J., 827, 28 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A.W., Glazebrook, K., McGregor, P.J. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 1070 10.1093/mnras/stt1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisdale, K., Agertz, O., Romeo, A.B., Renaud, F., Read, J.I. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1093 10.1093/mnras/stw3133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, D. A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., Brinks, E., Cigan, P., et al. 2012, A.J., 144, 134 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, D.A., Elmegreen, B.G., Archer, H., Simpson, C.E., Cigan, P. (2021), AJ, 161, 175 10.3847/1538-3881/abe1c0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W.-T., Ostriker, E.C. 2007, Ap.J., 660, 1232 10.1086/513176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, A.K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2008, A.J., 136, 2782 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusser, A., Silk, J. 2021, MNRAS, 509, 2979 10.1093/mnras/stab3121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, M. E., Hayward, C. C., Medling, A. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1620 10.1093/mnras/staa1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilp, A. M., Dalcanton, J. J., Skillman, E., et al. 2013, Ap.J., 733, 88 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacconi, L.J., Genzel, R., Sternberg, A. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 157 Google Scholar
Walter, F., Brinks, E., de Blok, W. J. G., et al. 2008, A.J., 136, 2563 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar