Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:23:05.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ACS LCID project: Variable stars as tracers of population gradients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Edouard J. Bernard
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain email: ebernard@iac.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a few highlights concerning the search for short-period variable stars in four galaxies, namely IC 1613, LGS3, Cetus and Tucana, based on very deep, multi-epoch HST/ACS photometry. These are discussed in the context of the star formation histories obtained from our very deep color-magnitude diagrams. In particular, we show how the pulsational properties of the RR Lyrae stars, which represent the vast majority of the observed variables, can trace subtle differences in the age and metallicity of the old population. For example, in the dwarf spheroidal galaxy Tucana we find that the fainter RR Lyrae stars, having a shorter period, are more centrally concentrated than the more luminous, longer period RR Lyrae variables. Through comparison with the predictions of theoretical models of stellar evolution and stellar pulsation, we interpret the fainter RR Lyrae stars as a more metal-rich subsample. In addition, we show that they must be older than about 10 Gyr, indicating that the metallicity gradient must have appeared very early on in the history of this galaxy. We also compare the populations of Cepheids in the galaxies of our sample based on their period-Wesenheit diagram. We tentatively classify them as classical short-period Cepheids in the two gas-rich galaxies (IC 1613 & LGS3), and as anomalous Cepheids in the dwarf spheroidals.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Bernard, E. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, E. J., et al. 2009a, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Blitz, L. & Robishaw, T. 2000, ApJ, 541, 675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, G., Caputo, F., Cassisi, S., Incerpi, R., & Marconi, M. 1997a, ApJ, 483, 811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., & Marconi, M. 1997b, A&AS, 121, 327Google Scholar
Cole, A. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallart, C., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuffrida, G., et al. 2006, MemSAI, 77, 125Google Scholar
Mayer, L., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, L., et al. 2007, Nature, 445, 738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngeow, C., et al. 2008, arXiv:astroph/0811.2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatek, S., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udalski, A., et al. 1999, Acta Astronomica, 49, 201Google Scholar
Udalski, A., et al. 2001, Acta Astronomica, 51, 221Google Scholar
van Agt, S. 1978, Publications of the David Dunlap Observatory, Vol. 3, No. 7, p. 205Google Scholar
Westfall, K., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar