Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:39:01.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AGN astrometry: A powerful tool for galaxy kinematic studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2021

Naftali Kimani ,
Andreas Brunthaler  and
Karl M. Menten
Naftali Kimani
Affiliation:
Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya email: kimani.naftali@ku.ac.ke
Andreas Brunthaler
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
Karl M. Menten
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article highlights the successes of the high resolution astrometric VLBI observations used for measuring proper motion of galaxies in the Local group. The required, high accuracies, often in the μ as yr−1 regime, are only attainable through the use of the phase-referencing technique. These require either a compact radio source (AGN) or strong maser emission in the target galaxy and, additionally, some compact extra-galactic radio sources (quasars) to serve as ideal background reference source. The derived proper motions can lead to lower limits on the orbital lower estimates to the mass of the host galaxy, promise a new handle on dynamical models of interacting galaxy systems and offer insights on the spatial distribution of dark matter in the near universe.

Keywords

AGNVLBIproper motionGalaxy evolution
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 15 , Symposium S356: Nuclear Activity in Galaxies Across Cosmic Time , October 2019 , pp. 276 - 279
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Brunthaler, A., Reid, M. J., & Falcke, H. 2005a, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 340, 455Google Scholar
Brunthaler, A., Reid, M. J., Falcke, H., Greenhill, L. J., & Henkel, C. 2005b, Science, 307, 144010.1126/science.1108342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunthaler, A., Reid, M. J., Falcke, H., Henkel, C., & Menten, K. M. 2007, A&A, 462, 101Google Scholar
Dinescu, D. I., Keeney, B. A., Majewski, S. R., & Girard, T. M. 2004, AJ, 128, 68710.1086/422491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinescu, D. I., Martnez-Delgado, D., Girard, T. M., Peñarrubia, J., Rix, H.-W., Butler, D., & van Altena, W. F. 2005, ApJL, 631, L4910.1086/497027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. 2012, Annalen der Physik, 524, 50710.1002/andp.201200212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, J. C., Athanassoula, L., Fuentes, O., & Bosma, A. 2004, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 314, 629Google Scholar
Kallivayalil, N., van der Marel, R. P., Alcock, C., Axelrod, T., Cook, K. H., Drake, A. J., & Geha, M. 2006, ApJ, 638, 77210.1086/498972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karachentsev, I.D. & Kashibadze, O. G. 2006, Astrophysics, 49, 310.1007/s10511-006-0002-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimani, N. 2016, Kinematics study of M81 and M82 galaxies, Doctoral thesis, Max-Planck Institute for RadioastronomyGoogle Scholar
Kulessa, A. S. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1992, MNRAS, 255, 10510.1093/mnras/255.1.105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, M. J. & Brunthaler, A. 2004, ApJ, 616, 87210.1086/424960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, M. J. & Honma, M. 2014, Annu. Rev. Astronomy Astrophysics 52, 33910.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccarone, T. J. & Gonzalez, A. H. 2018, ASP Conference Series, 517, 663Google Scholar
Pedreros, M. H., Costa, E., & Méndez, R. A. 2006, AJ, 131, 146110.1086/499922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatek, S., Pryor, C., Olszewski, E. W., Harris, H. C., Mateo, M., Minniti, D., Monet, D. G., Morrison, H., & Tinney, C. G. 2002, AJ, 124, 319810.1086/344767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatek, S., Pryor, C., Olszewski, E. W., Harris, H. C., Mateo, M., Minniti, D., & Tinney, C. G. 2003, AJ, 126, 234610.1086/378713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatek, S., Pryor, C., Bristow, P., Olszewski, E. W., Harris, H. C., Mateo, M., Minniti, D., & Tinney, C. G. 2005, AJ, 130, 9510.1086/430532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatek, S., Pryor, C., Bristow, P., Olszewski, E. W., Harris, H. C., Mateo, M., Minniti, D., & Tinney, C. G. 2006, AJ, 131, 144510.1086/499526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehm, W., Thies, I., Kroupa, P. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 273Google Scholar
Sofue, Y. 1998, PASJ, 50, 22710.1093/pasj/50.2.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Marel, R. P., Anderson, J., Bellini, A., et al. 2014, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 480, 43Google Scholar
Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., & Hoffman, Y. 2013, New Astronomy Reviews, 58, 18Google Scholar
Yun, M. S. 1999, IAU Symposium 186, Galaxy Interactions at Low and High Redshift, 8110.1007/978-94-011-4665-4_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar