Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:33:49.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of the Direct Distance Estimation procedure to eclipsing binaries in star clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

E. F. Milone
Affiliation:
Rothney Astrophysical Observatory, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr., NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada email: milone@ucalgary.ca
S. J. Schiller
Affiliation:
Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems, 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd, M/S EO/E04/N187, El Segundo, CA 90245, USA email: stephen_j_schiller@raytheon.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We alert the community to a paradigm method to calibrate a range of standard candles by means of well-calibrated photometry of eclipsing binaries in star clusters. In particular, we re-examine systems studied as part of our Binaries-in-Clusters program, and previously analyzed with earlier versions of the Wilson–Devinney light-curve modeling program. We make use of the 2010 version of this program, which incorporates a procedure to estimate the distance to an eclipsing system directly, as a system parameter, and is thus dependent on the data and analysis model alone. As such, the derived distance is accorded a standard error, independent of any additional assumptions or approximations that such analyses conventionally require.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Griffin, R. E., Gunn, J. E., Zimmerman, B. A., & Griffin, R. E. M. 1985, AJ, 90, 609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallrath, J., & Milone, E. F. 2009, Eclipsing Binary Stars: Modeling and Analysis, 2nd ed. (Springer Science+Business Media, Astronomy & Astrophysics Library), pp. 2728, 231ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, R. D. 1982, ApJ, 254, 606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milone, E. F., Stagg, C. R., Sugars, B. J. A., McVean, J. R., Schiller, S. J., Kallrath, J., & Bradstreet, D. H. 1995, AJ, 109, 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perryman, M. A. C., Brown, A. G. A., Lebreton, Y., et al. 1998, A&A, 331, 81Google Scholar
Schiller, S. J., & Milone, E. F. 1987, AJ, 93, 1471Google Scholar
Schiller, S. J., & Milone, E. F. 1988, AJ, 95, 1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. J. & Joner, M. D. 2005, ApJS, 159, 100Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. 2009, A&A, 497, 209Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E. 2008, ApJ, 647, 676Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E. & Raichur, H. 2012, MNRAS, 415, 596Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E. & van Hamme, W. 2009, ApJ, 699, 118Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E., van Hamme, W., & Terrell, D. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1469Google Scholar