Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:36:12.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Back-tracing space debris using proper elements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2022

Alessandra Celletti
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Rome Tor Vergata; Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy, celletti@mat.uniroma2.it
Giuseppe Pucacco
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Rome Tor Vergata; Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy, Giuseppe.Pucacco@roma2.infn.it
Tudor Vartolomei
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Rome Tor Vergata; Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy, vartolom@mat.uniroma2.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Normal form methods allow one to compute quasi-invariants of a Hamiltonian system, which are referred to as proper elements. The computation of the proper elements turns out to be useful to associate dynamical properties that lead to identify families of space debris, as it was done in the past for families of asteroids. In particular, through proper elements we are able to group fragments generated by the same break-up event and we possibly associate them to a parent body. A qualitative analysis of the results is given by the computation of the Pearson correlation coefficient and the probability of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Footnotes

*

This extended abstract has been presented by Tudor Vartolomei at the IAU Symposium 364

References

Celletti, A., Pucacco, G., and Vartolomei, T. Proper elements for space debris. Submitted to Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, (2021a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celletti, A., Pucacco, G., and Vartolomei, T. Reconnecting groups of space debris to their parent body through proper elements . Sci Rep 11, 22676 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02010-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celletti, A., Gachet, F., Galeş, C., Pucacco, G., and Efthymiopoulos, C. Dynamical models and the onset of chaos in space debris. Int. J. Nonlinear Mechanics 90, 47163 March (2017a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaula, W. M. Theory of Satellite Geodesy. Blaisdell Publ. Co., (1966).Google Scholar
Kaula, W. M. Development of the lunar and solar disturbing functions for a close satellite. The Astronomical Journal 67, 300 June (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celletti, A., Galeş, C., Pucacco, G., and Rosengren, A. J. Analytical development of the lunisolar disturbing function and the critical inclination secular resonance. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 127(3), 259283 March (2017b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H. Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, (1892).Google Scholar
Efthymiopoulos, C. Canonical perturbation theory; stability and diffusion in Hamiltonian systems: applications in dynamical astronomy. Workshop Series of the Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia 3, 3146 January (2011).Google Scholar
Apetrii, M., Celletti, A., Efthymiopoulos, C., Galeş, C., and Vartolomei, T. On a simulator of break-up events for space debris. Work in progress, (2021).Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., Krisko, P. H., Lieu, J.-C., and Am-Meador, P. NASA’s new break-up model of EVOLVE 4.0. Adv. Space Res. 28, (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinkrad, H. Space Debris: Models and Risk Analysis. (2006).Google Scholar
Cowan, G. Statistical data analysis. Clarendon Press, Oxford, (1997).Google Scholar