Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:05:45.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CO, HI, recent Spitzer SAGE results in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Yasuo Fukui*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan email: fukui@a.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Formation of GMCs is one of the most crucial issues in galaxy evolution. I will compare CO and HI in the LMC in 3 dimensional space for the first time aiming at revealing the physical connection between GMCs and associated HI gas at a ~40 pc scale. The present major findings are 1) [total CO intensity] ∝ [total HI intensity]0.8 for the 110 GMCs, and 2) the HI intensity tends to increase with the evolution of GMCs. I argue that these findings are consistent with the growth of GMCs via HI accretion over a time scale of a few × 10 Myrs. I will also discuss the role of the background stellar gravity and the dynamical compression by supershells in formation of GMCs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Blitz, L., Fukui, Y., Kawamura, A., Leroy, A., Mizuno, N., & Rosolowsky, E. 2006, in: Reipurth, B.Jewitt, D. & Keil, K. (eds.), Protostars and Planets V (Tucson: Univ. of Arizona) in pressGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Y., Mizuno, N., Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, A., Onishi, T., Ogawa, H., Yonekura, Y., Kawamura, A., et al. 1999, PASJ 51, 745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Y., Mizuno, N., Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, A., & Onishi, T. 2001, PASJ 53, L41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Y., Kawamura, A., Minamidani, T., Mizuno, Y., Kanai, Y., Onishi, T., Mizuno, N., Yonekura, Y., Mizuno, A., & Ogawa, H. 2006, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, A., et al. 2006, in these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Dopita, M. A., Staveley-Smith, L., & Bessell, M. S. 1999, AJ 118, 2797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dopita, M. A., Sault, R. J., Freeman, K. C., Lee, Y., & Chu, Y.-H. 2003, ApJS 148, 473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meixner, M. et al. 2006, AJ in pressGoogle Scholar
Mizuno, N., Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, A., Rubio, M., Abe, R., Saito, H., Onishi, T., Yonekura, Y., Yamaguchi, N., Ogawa, H., & Fukui, Y. 2001, PASJ 53, 971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaev, S., & Weinberg, M.D. 2000, ApJ 542, 804Google Scholar
Schmidt, Th. 1972, A&A 16, 95Google Scholar
Wong, T., & Blitz, L. 2002, ApJ 569, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, N., Onishi, T,., Mizuno, A., & Fukui, Y. 2001a, PASJ 53, 959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, N., Mizuno, A,., Rubio, M., Abe, R., Saito, H., Moriguchi, Y., Matsunaga, K., Onishi, T., Yonekura, Y., & Fukui, Y. 2001b, PASJ 53, 985CrossRefGoogle Scholar