Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:03:07.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commission 49: Interplanetary Plasma and Heliosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2005

David F. Webb ,
Jean-Louis Bougeret ,
Hilary V. Cane ,
Neil F. Cramer ,
Stephen W. Kahler ,
Masayoshi Kojima ,
Blai Sanahuja ,
Marek Vandas ,
Frank Verheest  and
Rudolf von Steiger
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Commission 49 covers research on the solar wind, shocks and particle acceleration, both transient and steady-state, e.g., corotating, structures within the heliosphere, and the termination shock and boundary of the heliosphere. During the last three years there was considerable progress made in studies of solar energetic particles, compositional and other signatures in the heliosphere, solar wind pickup ions, the termination shock, which was finally crossed by a spacecraft, and the boundary between the heliosphere and interstellar medium, and in solar wind modeling and space weather. These topics have been summarized here in five articles, each with extensive references that will guide the reader who wants further details. Observations from the following spacecraft have extensively used during this period: Ulysses, Cassini, Voyager 1 and 2, MESSENGER, ACE, Genesis, SOHO, Wind, and RHESSI.

Keywords

interplanetary mediumSun: solar-terrestrial relationsSun: coronal mass ejectionsSun: magnetic fieldsacceleration of particles
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 1 , Transactions T26A: Reports on Astronomy , December 2005 , pp. 103 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Cane, H.V. 2003 ApJ 598, 1403–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, H. V. & Erickson, W. C. 2003 JGR 108, doi:10.1029/2002JA009488Google Scholar
Cane, H. V., von Rosenvinge, T. T., Cohen, C. M. S. & Mewaldt, R. A. 2003 GRL 30, doi:10.1029/2002GL016580Google Scholar
Cliver, E. W. and Cane, H. V. 2002 EOS Trans. AGU 83, 61–68Google Scholar
Cohen, C. M. S. et al. 1999 GRL 26, 2697–3000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, R. B. & Krimigis, S. M. 2003 Adv. Space Res. 32, 597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, M. I. et al. 2003 ApJ 588, 1149–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, M. I. et al. 2004 ApJ 611, 1156–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloeckler, G. 2003, in: Velli, M. et al. (eds.), Solar Wind Ten CP679, 583–588Google Scholar
Haggerty, D. K. & Roelof, E. C. 2002 ApJ 579, 841–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, S. W. 2001 JGR 106, 20947–20955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, S. W. 2005 ApJ 628, 1014–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, S.W., Reames, D.V. & Sheeley, N.R. 2001 ApJ 562, 558–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K.-L., Trottet, G., Lantos, P. & Delaboudiniere, J.-P. 2001 A&A 373, 1073–1082Google Scholar
Klein, K.-L., Krucker, S., Trottet, G. & Hoang, S. 2005 A&A 431, 1047–1060Google Scholar
Krucker, S., Larson, D. E., Johnson, B. P. & Lin, R. P. 1999 ApJ 519, 864–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krucker, S. & Lin, R. P. 2002 Solar Phys 210, 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krucker, S. et al. 2003 EOS Trans. AGU 84(46), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract SH11D-1130Google Scholar
Krucker, S., Lin, R. P. & Kontar, E. P. 2004 EOS Trans. AGU 85(17), Jt. Assem. Suppl., Abstract SH22A-02Google Scholar
Krucker, S., Kontar, E. P. & Lin, R. P. 2005, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Lario, D. 2005 Adv. Space Res. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.081, in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lario, D. et al. 2000 JGR 105, 18251–18274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lario, D., Roelof, E. C., Decker, R. B. & Reisenfeld, D. B. 2003 Adv. Space Res. 32, 579–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lario, D. et al. 2004 JGR 109, A09S02, doi:10.1029/2003JA010107Google Scholar
Lario, D. et al. 2005 JGR 110, A09S11, doi:10.1029/2004JA010940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.A. 2005 ApJ Suppl. Ser. 158, 38–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. P. 2005 Adv. Space Res. 35, 1857–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Petrosian, V. & Mason, G.M. 2004 ApJ 613, L81–L84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G. M. et al. 2004 ApJ 606, 555–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, J. E. et al. 1999 GRL 26, 173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKibben, R. B. et al. 2001, in Proc. 27th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 3281–3284Google Scholar
McKibben, R. B. et al. 2003 Ann. Geophys. 21, 1217–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reames, D. V. 1999 Space Sci. Rev. 90, 413–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reames, D. V. 2000 ApJ 540, L111–L114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reames, D. V. 2002 ApJ 571, L63–L66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reedy, R. C. 2005, Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVI abstract #2184Google Scholar
Sanderson, T. R. et al. 2003 GRL 30, 8036, doi:10.1029/2003GL017306Google Scholar
Simnett, G. M., Roelof, E. C. & Haggerty, D. K. 2002 ApJ 579, 854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. W. et al. 2001 Solar Phys. 204, 227–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylka, A. J. et al. 2005 ApJ 625, 474–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar