Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T12:00:14.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing ice composition in dark molecular clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

C. Knez
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, email: claudia@astro.umd.edu Goddard Center for Astrobiology
M. Moore
Affiliation:
Goddard Center for Astrobiology
S. Travis
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Academy
R. Ferrante
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Academy
J. Chiar
Affiliation:
SETI Institute
A. Boogert
Affiliation:
Herschel Science Center
L. Mundy
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, email: claudia@astro.umd.edu Goddard Center for Astrobiology
Y. Pendleton
Affiliation:
NASA Headquarters
A. Tielens
Affiliation:
NASA Ames
E. van Dishoeck
Affiliation:
Leiden University
N. Evans
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present 5–20 μm Spitzer/IRS spectroscopy toward stars behind dark molecular clouds. We present preliminary results from the Serpens dark cloud to show the variation between environments within a cloud. We are surveying 3 clouds with varying levels of star formation activity. Serpens has the highest level of activity from our 3 clouds. We show that location as well extinction can cause variations in ice composition. We also find that some lines of sight contain organic molecules such as methane and methanol, and the first detection of acetylene ice in the interstellar medium. We believe the high extinction lines of sight have been enriched by star formation activity near those lines of sight.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Bergin, E. A., et al. 1997, ApJ, 482, 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, M. P., et al. 2002, ApJ, 576, 1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazaux, S., et al. 2003, ApJL, 593, 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. M., et al. 2000, ApJL, 531, 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, T. I. & Herbst, E. 1993, MNRAS, 263, 589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knez, C., et al. , 2005, ApJL, 635, 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, W., et al. 1996, A&A, 309, 633Google Scholar
Tielens, A. G. G. M. & Hagen, W. 1982, A&A, 114, 245Google Scholar
Whittet, D. C. B., et al. 1996, ApJ, 458, 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar