Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:35:29.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct imaging of massive extrasolar planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Paul Kalas
Paul Kalas*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA email: kalas@berkeley.edul
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The direct detection of an extrasolar planet can provide accurate measurements of its orbit, mass and composition, greatly improving our understanding of how planets form and evolve. Recent advances in ground-based and space-based imaging techniques have now produced the first direct images of extrasolar planets. Typically these are many-Jupiter-mass planets on wide orbits. Direct imaging therefore probes the outer architecture of planetary systems and it is highly complementary to other techniques sensitive to inner architectures. This brief review summarizes the properties of the currently imaged exoplanets, provides an update on the orbit of Fomalhaut b, and highlights the emerging phenomenon of circumplanetary disks.

Keywords

planetary systemsplanets and satellites: ringsaccretionaccretion disksinterplanetary mediumstars: individual (Fomalhaut)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S276: The Astrophysics of Planetary Systems: Formation, Structure, and Dynamical Evolution , October 2010 , pp. 279 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Arnold, L. & Schneider, J. 2004, A&A, 420, 1123Google Scholar
Bottke, W. F., Levison, H. F., Nesvorny, D., & Dones, L. 2007, Icarus, 190, 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, B. P., Johnson, J. A., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, A. & Liebert, J. 1993, Rev. Mod. Phys., 65, 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Lunine, J. 2003, ApJ, 596, 587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Dumas, C., et al. 2004, A&A, 438, L25Google Scholar
Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Dumas, C., et al. 2005, A&A, 425, L29Google Scholar
Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Bonavita, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 509, A52Google Scholar
Chiang, E., Kite, E., Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2009, ApJ, 693, 734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducourant, C., Teixeira, R., Chauvin, G., et al. 2008, A&A, 477, L1Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Veras, D., Ford, E. C., & Beichman, C. A. 2009, ApJ, 707, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchene, G. 2008, New Astron. Revs, 52, 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabrycky, D. C. & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., & Lodders, K. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galland, F., Lagrange, A.-M., Udry, S., et al. 2005, A&A, 443, 337Google Scholar
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2005, Nature, 435, 1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Fitzgerald, M., & Clampin, M. 2011, in prepGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. M. & Wyatt, M. C. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koresko, C. D. 1998, ApJ, 507, L145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratter, K. M., Murray-Clay, R. A., & Youdin, A. N. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafreniere, D., Doyon, R., Marois, C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafreniere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & van Kerkwijk, M. H. 2010, ApJ, 719, 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrange, A.-M., Gratadour, D., Chauvin, G., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, L21Google Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Weights, D. J., Roche, P. F., & Riddick, F. C. 2006, MNRAS, 373, L60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhman, K. L., McLeod, K. K., & Goldenson, N. 2005, ApJ, 623, 1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintosh, B. A., Graham, J. R., Palmer, D. W., et al. 2008, SPIE, 7015, 31Google Scholar
Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Barman, T., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marois, C., Zuckerman, B., Konopacky, Q. M., et al. 2010, Nature, 468, 1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, S., Jayawardhana, R., Huelamo, N., & Mamajek, E. 2007, ApJ, 657, 1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro-Martin, A., Rieke, G. H., & Su, K. Y. L. 2010, ApJ, 721, L199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, A., Amado, P. J., Barrado, D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405, L81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nero, D. & Bjorkman, J. E. 2009, ApJ, 702, L163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhauser, R., Guenther, E. W., Wuchterl, G., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, L13Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. L. & Close, L. M. 2010, ApJ, 717, 878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, B. R. & Hinkley, S. 2009, ARAA, 47, 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasio, A. F. & Ford, E. B. 1996, Science, 274, 954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J., & Gorelick, N. 2010, ApJ, 711, 772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidemeister, M., Krivov, A. V., Schmidt, T. O. B., et al. 2009, A&A, 503, 247Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. O. B., Neuhauser, R., Seifahrt, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 491, 311Google Scholar
Seager, S. & Deming, D. 2010, ARAA, 48, 631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. A. & Terrile, R. 1984, Science, 226, 1421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veras, D., Crepp, J. R., & Ford, E. B. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbiscer, A. J., Skrutskie, M. F., & Hamilton, D. P. 2009, Nature, 461, 1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Bejar, V. J. S., Martin, E. L., et al. 2000, Science, 290, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar