Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:49:52.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eclipsing Binaries Within Visual Ones: Prospects of Combined Solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2012

Petr Zasche*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University Prague, CZ-180 00 Praha 8, V Holešovičkách 2, Czech Republic email: zasche@sirrah.troja.mff.cuni.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study of eclipsing binaries as members of multiple systems can provide us important information about their origin, evolution, mutual inclination of the orbits, independent distance and mass determination, as well as the stellar multiplicity in general. We are carrying out a long-term photometric monitoring of several eclipsing binaries within the visual multiples and, besides the complete light curves, we are trying to detect the period changes due to the orbital motion around a common barycenter.

Systems like DN UMa, V819 Her, LO Hya, or VW Cep are typical examples of eclipsing binaries orbiting around the barycenter of the multiple system, while their respective periods are on the order of years or decades. However, the expected period variation is only hardly detectable and there is still uncertainty about which of the components is the eclipsing one. Precise spectroscopy would be of great benefit, but detecting the changes in the gamma velocity is still problematic, and spectral disentangling of such complicated systems like sextuple VV Crv (periods 1.46, 3.14, and 44.51 days) is also rather difficult. However, the detection of the changing depths of the eclipses in the latter system would be interesting.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Eggleton, P. P. & Tokovinin, A. A. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, J. M. & Giménez, A. 1986, Ap&SS, 125, 181Google Scholar
Massarotti, A., Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., & Fogel, J. 2008, AJ, 135, 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, D. M. 1986, PASP, 98, 1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, D. M., Mason, B. D., Hartkopf, W. I., & Wycoff, G. L. 2002, AJ, 123, 1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakirov, M. M. 2008, Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 24, 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar