Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:41:57.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolution of intracluster medium in stellar clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

W. Chantereau Open the ORCID record for W. Chantereau [Opens in a new window]
W. Chantereau*
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK email: w.chantereau@ljmu.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stars in globular clusters lose mass through slow stellar winds that are retained by the stellar cluster and should contribute to build up a non-negligible intracluster medium over time. However, all the observations so far found only a negligible amount of gas in GCs. We propose here to test different mechanisms such as ram-pressure stripping by the motion of the GC in the Galactic halo medium and the inclusion of ionising sources to explain the lack of gas in GCs. We use full 3D hydrodynamical simulations taking into account stellar winds, ionising radiation, radiative heating and radiative pressure. We find that the combined effect of ram-pressure and ionisation are able to explain the negligible amount of gas observed in the core of intermediate-mass and massive GCs.

Keywords

globular clusters: generalhydrodynamicsmethods: numerical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S351: Star Clusters: From the Milky Way to the Early Universe , May 2019 , pp. 416 - 419
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Freire, P. C., Kramer, M., Lyne, A. G., Camilo, F., Manchester, R. N., & D’Amico, N. 2001, ApJ, 557, L105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, F. G., de Jong, T., Neugebauer, G., Rice, W. L., & Emerson, J. P. 1988, AJ, 96, 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. & van Loon, J. T. 2007, A&A, 476, 1261Google Scholar
McDonald, I. & Zijlstra, A. A. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, W., Ruffert, M., & Salaris, M. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., Aubert, D., Stranex, T., & Teyssier, R. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teyssier, R. 2002, A&A, 385, 337Google Scholar
van Loon, J. T., Stanimirovic, S., Evans, A., & Muller, E. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar