Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T17:31:59.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring 3D data of Dwarf Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

Katarzyna Bensch
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008, Granada, Spain email: kasia@iaa.es
Christina Thöne
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008, Granada, Spain email: kasia@iaa.es
Antonio de Ugarte Postigo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008, Granada, Spain email: kasia@iaa.es
Luca Izzo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008, Granada, Spain email: kasia@iaa.es
David Alexander Kann
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008, Granada, Spain email: kasia@iaa.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dwarf irregular galaxies are places of ongoing star-formation in the low-redshift Universe. Low metallicity dwarfs were originally thought to be the youngest galaxies in the local Universe, however, there is now evidence that they consist of matter which has previously undergone evolution and is enriched by star-formation. Here we present a sample of seven nearby metal-poor dwarf galaxies with a young stellar populations selected from the SDSS which we study using integral field unit (IFU) data from the VIMOS instrument, covering the spectral range between the He II 4686 line and the [SII] 6718/6733 Å doublet. We present property maps across the galaxies and compare different galaxies and different HII regions within the same galaxy. We find that the properties within one galaxy are not uniform and they also differ between different galaxies concerning star-formation, kinematics and metallicity and morphology. The observed differences across individual galaxies together with disturbed kinematics and morphologies can be interpreted as possible signs of recent interactions and/or mergers. Additionally, we present a comparison of different metallicity calibrations and search for systematic differences obtained using different methods.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Abazajian, K., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A. et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianco, F. B., Modjaz, M., Oh, S. M., Fierroz, D. et al. 2016, AaC, 16, 54 Google Scholar
Bradamante, F., Matteucci, F., & D’Ercole, A. 1998, A&A, 337, 338 Google Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., & Cohen, J. G. 1996, AJ, 112, 839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. I., & Phillipps, S. 1988, MNRAS, 233, 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohm-Palmer, R. C., Skillman, E. D., Mateo, M. et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohm-Palmer, R. C., Skillman, E. D., Gallagher, J. et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., Tamblyn, P., & Congdon, C. E. 1994, ApJ, 435, 22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kewley, L. J., & Ellison, S. L. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Févre, O., Saisse, M., Mancini, D. et al. 2003, SPIE, 4841, 1670 Google Scholar
Martín-Manjón, M. L., Molló, M., Daz, A. I., & Terlevich, R. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 1294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo, M. L. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaderos, P., Loose, H.-H., Thuan, T. X., & Fricke, K. J. 1996, A&AS, 120, 207Google Scholar
Sánchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Marino, R. A. et al. 2012, A&A, 546, 2Google Scholar
Seiden, P. E., Schulman, L. S., & Gerola, H. 1979, ApJ, 232, 702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolstoy, E., Hill, V., & Tosi, M. 2009, ARAA, 47, 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar